Results 61 to 70 of 125
- 05-11-2009 08:22 PM #61
ADVERTS
Then you must have some other problems bigger than both of us. cuz I ran half a dozen various tests about half an hour ago. This may go back to the NAT thing I was talking about earlier. Just to show you I'm not jerkin' your chain, here's a screen capture (time in lower right). This is about 4 seconds into a 5 second test
//greg//
- 05-11-2009 08:22 PM # ADS
Paying The Bills With Google Adsense Circuit advertisement- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
- 05-11-2009 08:25 PM #62
- 05-11-2009 08:27 PM #63
- 05-11-2009 08:33 PM #64
Greg porker is a noob, please give him a break. I think there's a way it can be done with some success and now that I'm knee deep in this stuff I bet we can do it. We have the tools to at least test the concept and then put together a solution that might work for some. It won't be perfect but it's tons better than nothing. Ease off the piggy (enuf swine flu goin around as it is).
- 05-11-2009 08:33 PM #65
Wrong. Like I said, half an hour ago I ran all the ISPGeeks tests, some of them several times. Including the Capacity test. The upload portion is a joke for a satcommers. There's no way we'll even register through the first 6-7 levels.
Capacity test statistics
------------------------
Download capacity: 187792 bps
Download packets per second: 23
Upload capacity: 68584 bps
Upload packets per second: 8
Quality of service: 80 %
Packet size: 1000 Bytes
If my tests are not in your logs, you've got other problems.
//greg//
- 05-11-2009 08:50 PM #66
Greg you aren't expected to rate in the first 6-7 levels. It's going to run through them anyway just in case. That's the purpose of such a test and answers your first concern right away. Not a fixed test at all as you claim. Its dynamic, takes into consideration cache, burst and any other form of acceleration and selects the appropriate test for YOUR connection not just some generic configuration. That's exactly what you asked for. One second while I check the logs.
- 05-11-2009 09:03 PM #67
- 05-11-2009 09:44 PM #68
SatelliteGuys Freshman
- Join Date
- May 10th, 2009
- Location
- Tombstone, Az
- Posts
- 27
Ok a couple more test. They may not be valid as this is prime Internet and satellite time.
But it looks to me like (and as an original 9000 spaceway III user that spaceway III is deliberately being throttled. I have said from the beginning that Hughes is doing this so that the first users on spaceway III don't have superb performance and as they add users it gets to be unacceptable.
7000S modem satmex5
17.57 mst
Capacity test statistics
------------------------
Download capacity: 809928 bps
Download packets per second: 101
Upload capacity: 152864 bps
Upload packets per second: 19
Quality of service: 90 %
Packet size: 1000 Bytes
18:01 mst
Capacity test statistics
------------------------
Download capacity: 551976 bps
Download packets per second: 68
Upload capacity: 34512 bps
Upload packets per second: 4
Quality of service: 85 %
Packet size: 1000 B
9000 modem spaceway III
18:05 mst
Capacity test statistics
------------------------
Download capacity: 4421304 bps
Download packets per second: 552
Upload capacity: 36392 bps
Upload packets per second: 4
Quality of service: 64 %
Packet size: 1000 Bytes
18:08 mst
Capacity test statistics
------------------------
Download capacity: 5547488 bps
Download packets per second: 693
Upload capacity: 36032 bps
Upload packets per second: 4
Quality of service: 23 %
Packet size: 1000 Bytes
- 05-11-2009 10:09 PM #69
- 05-11-2009 10:19 PM #70
Hughes is intentionally dropping packets to achieve the service level you're seeing. Some may call it throttling, comcast users know it well as torrent busting and similar nasty names.
-
Advertising
- SatelliteGuys.US
- has no influence
- on advertisings
- that are displayed by
- Google Adsense








LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

Forum Threads
Bookmarks