Results 1 to 10 of 20
Thread: I Screwed Up Big Time!!!
- 01-28-2010 08:27 PM #1
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- Aug 12th, 2009
- Location
- ne texas
- Posts
- 61
I Screwed Up Big Time!!!
ADVERTS 1
I thought I would bite the bullet and break down and get a good lnb because I couldn't understand what was the best lnb to get. I got a dual feed chaparal feed horn and a norsat lnb. I thought the feed horn meant dual feed as in would take the horizontal and vertical simultaneously and feed the lnb. Wroooooong!!!!! I get them both in and see that the feed horn apparently has to be equipped with 2 lnbs. Unbelievable. I can't win for losing. Now I either have to send the feed horn back or get another expensive lnb. What is the advantage of this type of feed horn? Oh yeah I would also have to combine the signal too into one cable.
- 01-28-2010 08:27 PM # ADS
Register Today & This Ad Goes Away! Circuit advertisement- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
- 01-28-2010 09:03 PM #2
The main advantage is that you don't need a servo to control the poloarity. This means you can use a multi switch to connect the feedhorn to your FTA receiver.
Basically to get it into one cable you use a multi switch to connect to both LNBs and then use the receiver out to connect to your receiver. It is recommended that you use a power inserter when you do this set up as the vertical LNB will receive 13v instead of the recommended 18v.
Also if you want a voltage controlled LNBF our sponsers have them available. I'm using the Geosat Pro C2 and am very happy with it.
- 01-28-2010 09:19 PM #3
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- Aug 12th, 2009
- Location
- ne texas
- Posts
- 61 Thread Starter
I have the Geosat Pro C2 and thought I could get more signal by getting a better lnb, norsat had good reviews, I should have just let it alone, I don't understand why you would buy 2 expensive norsats one for each polarity, and then a voltage regulator and a combiner. I guess less is more.
- 01-28-2010 09:43 PM #4
From what I've read on the forum, if you have a smaller dish it can help having better quality LNBs. I only have a 10' so I can't attest to how expensive LNBs compare to voltage controlled LNBs on smaller dishes.
- 01-29-2010 08:08 AM #5
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- Aug 12th, 2009
- Location
- ne texas
- Posts
- 61 Thread Starter
I have a 10' foot dish also, I will just have to stick with my geosat and send the other back. Thanks for your help.
- 01-29-2010 10:05 PM #6
One type is a dual feed for C and Ku or it could be a dual C feed (needs a C band LNB for vertical and horizontal polarization) or it could be a dual Ku feed. All would require separate coax cables. A dual C/Ku feed will have 2 different size waveguide mounts (the smaller for Ku) while the dual C and dual Ku will have same size waveguide mounts for the horizontal and vertical polarizations - of course, the dual C band would have larger waveguide flanges than the dual Ku feed. The C/Ku feed allows you to receive both satellite bands with one antenna and the receiver selects which band while the C/C and Ku/Ku feeds allow faster switching between polarizations. If you need a feed for just C or Ku, you'll need to return the feed that you purchased and get a single feed for either C or Ku. The vendor might charge a restocking fee for returns and you'll have to pay the shipping charges to return it.
Azbox Elite and Ultra, 4DTV DSR922/HDD-200 (non-bricked 4160 EMM), Paraclipse-12 with C2, KTI CKD-12 w/DMX741, WS9036/DMX521/SG9120, Sony Bravia 46", Sony BluRay models BDP-S360 and BDP-S570, Onkyo 6.1 Amplifier, too many remote controls.
- 01-30-2010 08:14 AM #7
Just to add to the above, back to the original question of WHY, most people who have used the feedhorn you have will say that the quality is superior. I don't use that kind of dual feedhorn, I have a Chaparral Co-rotor, which is one of the C/Ku mentioned above. I got that because I wanted both C and Ku, and I also wanted to be able to adjust the polarity skew. However apparently whenever you block part of the C-band throat with a Ku throat, you lose a bit of signal, so the people who are trying to get every ounce of signal like the dual C-band feeds. Another issue with the Co-rotor is that you need a receiver capable of adjusting the polarotor to the desired polarity.
I know that the LNBs are very expensive, but even the cheapest of the Norsat or Cal-Amp LNBs have better specs than any of those voltage switched LNBFs. Basically, it's just a tradeoff of quality vs convenience. Best quality is the dual-C or dual Ku, most convenient is the voltage switched lnbf, and the Co-rotor style C/Ku is kind of a tradeoff between the two.
- 01-30-2010 11:35 AM #8
I'd keep the dual (H+V) feed horn and buy a second lnb.
I've been thinking I will do that when I get to NM.
- 01-30-2010 01:03 PM #9
You actually bought the best performing feedhorn. If you can spare the cash, get another lnb and use a multiswitch. Those zinwell 2 x 4 or even 4 x 4 (you don't really need a 4x4 but they are cheap on ebay). It will perform like an lnb with less signal loss.
- 01-30-2010 01:59 PM #10
If you do keep the dual LNB, C-band only feed, here is a simple mod to power it and do the switching.
If you'll read the thread, the 4x8 multiswitch is quite inexpensive.
I got one to run a quad-LNB orthomode feed, with two LNBs for C, and two LNBs for Ku.
Pendragon mods a 4x8 multiswitch for high voltage on both ports:
http://www.satelliteguys.us/fta-shac...v-outputs.html

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks