Those listed below are our PROUD SatelliteGuys GOLD Sponsors!
Applied Instruments DishStore.NET glorystar.tv satelliteavgs tele-satellite.com
Have a News Scoop For Us? >>> CONTACT US! <<<

Welcome HOME to SatelliteGuys.US!


  •  » Looking for help picking a satellite company?
  •  » Need Help with your Satellite System?
  •  » Need Advice on your Home Theater Setup?
  •  » Looking for the latest industry news and rumors?

...then you have come to the right place!
DIRECTV, DISH Network, FTA Satellite, Cable TV, HDTV even 3DTV...
We Can Help! We are known as America's Satellite Information Source!
YES! I want to register an account for free right now!
p.s.: Registered members see a lot less ads! REGISTER TODAY!

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    steve515 is offline SatelliteGuys Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 26th, 2009
    Location
    Ky
    Posts
    41

    Problems with focal length

    ADVERTS
    After searching and reading different things here on satelliteguys, i decided to go down to the basement and measure my dish. It is currently in halves, so it is real easy for me to measure.

    The diameter of my dish is 91 inches. The depth is 14 inches. I found and used a focal length forumula in this forum. I cam up with a focal length of 36.97 inches. Well, okay....Fine....

    A co worker had this dish and gave it to me. I took some pics when i went to look at it the first time. I got a picture measuring the distance from the center of the dish to the feedhorn. It measured 32.750. I looked at the feedhorn and checked what the scaler was set on. It is set to 38.

    The owner said they never had any issues and that they really liked having cband.

    How can these measurement be different?

    There is no way i can get 4 more inches from those struts. Surely i measure wrong, calculated wrong or something........

    Can someone set me straight?

    Pic attached

    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Focal Length.jpg 
Views:	76 
Size:	309.8 KB 
ID:	47323  
    Last edited by steve515; 02-08-2010 at 08:15 PM.

  2. # ADS
    Paying The Bills With Google Adsense Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many
     
  3. #2
    PANHANDLER's Avatar
    PANHANDLER is offline Pub Member / Supporter Pub Member / Supporter

    Help Keep SatelliteGuys For All, Click a Star and Become a Supporter! This Member did! Help Support The Site And Get Rid of the Syndicated Ads, This Member did! If you enjoy the site consider supporting it, this member did! Click a Star and become a Supporting Pub Member today!
    Join Date
    Mar 8th, 2009
    Location
    Western NY , Fredonia
    Posts
    161
    i hope i don't get in trouble for c/p
    but here goes
    To calculate the focal distance, you need to measure the diameter (D) and the depth (d) of the dish. Measurements should be in like units (you can't use feet for the diameter and inches for depth). For this example, let's say we have a dish that is 120 inches in diameter (D) and 18 inches deep (d). Focal distance (f) equals the diameter squared (D x D) divided by 16 times the depth (16 x d) or:
    D x D = 120 x 120 = 14400
    16 x d = 16 x 18 = 288
    D x D/16 x d = 14400/288 = 50
    Therefore focal distance f = 50 inches
    After you have calculated the focal distance (f), you can use that figure to calculate the f/D ratio of your dish. In this case, using the same diameter of (D) = 120; and the calculated focal distance (f) = 50
    f / D = 50 / 120 = .416
    f /D = .416
    And round up to give a setting of .42.
    Last edited by PANHANDLER; 02-08-2010 at 09:49 PM.

  4. #3
    steve515 is offline SatelliteGuys Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 26th, 2009
    Location
    Ky
    Posts
    41
    Thread Starter
    That is excactly what i did. And i still came up with a focal length of 36.97. When the dish was installed years ago, the feedhorn was set to about 32.750.

    That is what i dont understand.

    thanks

  5. #4
    B.J.'s Avatar
    B.J. is offline SatelliteGuys Junkie
    Join Date
    Oct 15th, 2008
    Location
    Western Maine
    Posts
    2,029
    Your calculations seem correct, but I think your measurements are off. Your measurements would give an F/D of a bit above 0.40, not .38. I'm guessing that since the dish is in halfs, that it is sagging a bit, and the depth is smaller than you think. I tried a depth of 15" and that gives an F/D of closer to .38, and a FL of around 34". The sag of the dish would probably also cause the diameter to be off a bit.

    Anyway, I'm guessing that when the dish is together, your measurements will be different.

  6. #5
    truckracer's Avatar
    truckracer is offline SatelliteGuys Junkie
    Join Date
    Sep 17th, 2004
    Location
    Charleston wv
    Posts
    3,161
    my 10' sami mesh dish uses .38

  7. #6
    caddata is offline SatelliteGuys Regular
    Join Date
    Jun 8th, 2005
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL
    Posts
    333
    Focal length calculations assume a reflector that's true parabolic. It's possible that when the dish is assembled and you find the "sweet spot", you my find that the calculated focal point in not correct. Use the calculation as a starting point only, always adjust it in, out, and sideways to find the "sweet spot". Any warpage or variance from a true parabolic will move the focal point (sweet spot).

    Harold

  8. #7
    Beano_face is offline SatelliteGuys Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 22nd, 2009
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    194
    this might help you out...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	fdcalcr1.jpg 
Views:	81 
Size:	19.4 KB 
ID:	47394  

  9. #8
    steve515 is offline SatelliteGuys Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 26th, 2009
    Location
    Ky
    Posts
    41
    Thread Starter
    I am using the right forumula and the math is correct. Its just that my answer is several inches away from the dish then where the feedhorn was originally installed years ago. Could the dish be warped? Yeah, i guess it could be. But by measuring it....It isnt.

    I am not installing right now, and wont until march or april. I am just getting some things together at this point. I am stuck on this focal length though. I just dont understand why the original feedhorn is in a different location than what i calculated.

    thanks
    steve

  10. #9
    SatelliteAV's Avatar
    SatelliteAV is offline Proud Gold Sponsor
    Join Date
    Sep 3rd, 2004
    Location
    Roseville, CA
    Posts
    3,118
    Quote Originally Posted by steve515 View Post
    I just dont understand why the original feedhorn is in a different location than what i calculated.
    Just because the feedhorn is mounted in this position and previous owner was receiving C-Band signals doesn't mean that the system was optimized. Signals can be received even if the feedhorn is mounted off center, crooked, incorrect skew or with an incorrect focal distance. The system will have better performance when the mechanicals are properly set.

    I wouldn't be too concerned about this discrepancy at this point. It will be obvious if the feedhorn adjustment increases the SQ during the peaking of the installation.
    Brian Gohl - Satellite AV, LLC (Gold Sponsor)
    Equipment Development / Distribution / Repair / Call Center

    888-483-4673 - http://www.satelliteav.com
    eBay Special Deals
    Attention Installers: Want more work? Join the Largest Satellite Technician Referral Website - www.FTAinstall.com

  11. #10
    McGuyver's Avatar
    McGuyver is offline SatelliteGuys Senior
    Join Date
    Apr 4th, 2007
    Location
    Nuclear Testing Grounds
    Posts
    776
    I know that this thread is a bit old but I thought of a possible answer to your question, the effective aperture size that you input for the calculation was likely incorrect. If you measured 91 inches but the actual effective aperture size according to the manufacturer is a little less such as maybe 87 inches it will then calculate properly. The full diameter of the dish may not always be effective due to certain formed edges, etc.

    I use the following and with your posted measurements I came up with the same length which contradicts the physical F/D as you noted.


    Parabolic Reflector Analysis





Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

SatelliteGuys.US | 46 Miami Avenue | Newington, Connecticut 06111
Links monetized by VigLink