| Welcome to SatelliteGuys.US - America's Most Popular Satellite Information Forum!!
You are currently viewing our forums as a guest which gives you limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post & reply messages in our forum, play in our fun arcade and communicate privately with other members as well as enjoy many other members only features.
Also as a registered member you will also see much less advertising!
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
CLICK HERE TO REGISTER! |  | | 
02-08-2010, 06:34 PM
| | SatelliteGuys Freshman | | Join Date: Dec 26th, 2009 Location: Ky
Posts: 38
| | | Problems with focal length After searching and reading different things here on satelliteguys, i decided to go down to the basement and measure my dish. It is currently in halves, so it is real easy for me to measure.
The diameter of my dish is 91 inches. The depth is 14 inches. I found and used a focal length forumula in this forum. I cam up with a focal length of 36.97 inches. Well, okay....Fine....
A co worker had this dish and gave it to me. I took some pics when i went to look at it the first time. I got a picture measuring the distance from the center of the dish to the feedhorn. It measured 32.750. I looked at the feedhorn and checked what the scaler was set on. It is set to 38.
The owner said they never had any issues and that they really liked having cband.
How can these measurement be different?
There is no way i can get 4 more inches from those struts. Surely i measure wrong, calculated wrong or something........
Can someone set me straight?
Pic attached
Last edited by steve515; 02-08-2010 at 07:15 PM.
| 
02-08-2010, 08:27 PM
|  | Pub Member / Supporter | | Pub Member / Supporter Join Date: Mar 8th, 2009 Location: Western NY
Posts: 126
| | |
i hope i don't get in trouble for c/p
but here goes To calculate the focal distance, you need to measure the diameter (D) and the depth (d) of the dish. Measurements should be in like units (you can't use feet for the diameter and inches for depth). For this example, let's say we have a dish that is 120 inches in diameter (D) and 18 inches deep (d). Focal distance (f) equals the diameter squared (D x D) divided by 16 times the depth (16 x d) or: D x D = 120 x 120 = 14400 16 x d = 16 x 18 = 288 D x D/16 x d = 14400/288 = 50 Therefore focal distance f = 50 inches After you have calculated the focal distance (f), you can use that figure to calculate the f/D ratio of your dish. In this case, using the same diameter of (D) = 120; and the calculated focal distance (f) = 50 f / D = 50 / 120 = .416 f /D = .416 And round up to give a setting of .42.
__________________ 2-Pansat 3500, 1 Icon 550, 1 Fortec ,1 AZ Box elite LNB QPH-031 ,Geo CKU CK1 Fortec Star 31"Unimesh 7.5'( 10' going up in the spring ) 35-TRDS8 switch DG-380 Motor, Von Weise .GBOX V3000
Last edited by PANHANDLER; 02-08-2010 at 08:49 PM.
| 
02-09-2010, 05:39 AM
| | SatelliteGuys Freshman
Topic Starter
| | Join Date: Dec 26th, 2009 Location: Ky
Posts: 38
| |
That is excactly what i did. And i still came up with a focal length of 36.97. When the dish was installed years ago, the feedhorn was set to about 32.750.
That is what i dont understand.
thanks
| 
02-09-2010, 06:42 AM
|  | SatelliteGuys Junkie | | Join Date: Oct 15th, 2008
Posts: 1,346
| | |
Your calculations seem correct, but I think your measurements are off. Your measurements would give an F/D of a bit above 0.40, not .38. I'm guessing that since the dish is in halfs, that it is sagging a bit, and the depth is smaller than you think. I tried a depth of 15" and that gives an F/D of closer to .38, and a FL of around 34". The sag of the dish would probably also cause the diameter to be off a bit.
Anyway, I'm guessing that when the dish is together, your measurements will be different.
| 
02-09-2010, 09:09 AM
|  | SatelliteGuys Junkie | | Join Date: Sep 17th, 2004 Location: Charleston wv
Posts: 2,480
| |
my 10' sami mesh dish uses .38
__________________
With great advances in medical science-the ugliest person can be made beautiful but "stupid" will always be a terminal condition.
| 
02-09-2010, 09:46 AM
| | SatelliteGuys Regular | | Join Date: Jun 8th, 2005 Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 313
| | |
Focal length calculations assume a reflector that's true parabolic. It's possible that when the dish is assembled and you find the "sweet spot", you my find that the calculated focal point in not correct. Use the calculation as a starting point only, always adjust it in, out, and sideways to find the "sweet spot". Any warpage or variance from a true parabolic will move the focal point (sweet spot).
Harold
| 
02-10-2010, 10:22 PM
|  | SatelliteGuys Freshman | | Join Date: Mar 22nd, 2009 Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 11
| | |
this might help you out...
__________________ my KU band; 39 inch Digiwave dish, SG 2100 DiSEqC motor, DGW-101 C/L quad LNB, Coolsat 6000 my C band; 10 foot star trak dish, DSR-920, Von Weise actuator, geosatpro C2 lnbf, Coolsat 6000. Coolsat8000 for HD | 
02-11-2010, 05:28 AM
| | SatelliteGuys Freshman
Topic Starter
| | Join Date: Dec 26th, 2009 Location: Ky
Posts: 38
| |
I am using the right forumula and the math is correct. Its just that my answer is several inches away from the dish then where the feedhorn was originally installed years ago. Could the dish be warped? Yeah, i guess it could be. But by measuring it....It isnt.
I am not installing right now, and wont until march or april. I am just getting some things together at this point. I am stuck on this focal length though. I just dont understand why the original feedhorn is in a different location than what i calculated.
thanks
steve
| 
02-11-2010, 07:11 AM
|  | Pub Member / Site Sponsor | | Pub Member / Supporter Join Date: Sep 3rd, 2004 Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 1,543
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by steve515 I just dont understand why the original feedhorn is in a different location than what i calculated.  | Just because the feedhorn is mounted in this position and previous owner was receiving C-Band signals doesn't mean that the system was optimized. Signals can be received even if the feedhorn is mounted off center, crooked, incorrect skew or with an incorrect focal distance. The system will have better performance when the mechanicals are properly set.
I wouldn't be too concerned about this discrepancy at this point. It will be obvious if the feedhorn adjustment increases the SQ during the peaking of the installation.
| 
02-26-2010, 06:20 PM
|  | SatelliteGuys Regular | | Join Date: Apr 4th, 2007 Location: Nuclear Testing Grounds
Posts: 453
| |
I know that this thread is a bit old but I thought of a possible answer to your question, the effective aperture size that you input for the calculation was likely incorrect. If you measured 91 inches but the actual effective aperture size according to the manufacturer is a little less such as maybe 87 inches it will then calculate properly. The full diameter of the dish may not always be effective due to certain formed edges, etc.
I use the following and with your posted measurements I came up with the same length which contradicts the physical F/D as you noted. Parabolic Reflector Analysis
__________________  McGuyver
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:53 AM. |