Results 1 to 10 of 11
Thread: Problems with focal length
- 02-08-2010 06:34 PM #1
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- Dec 26th, 2009
- Location
- Ky
- Posts
- 41
Problems with focal length
ADVERTS 1
After searching and reading different things here on satelliteguys, i decided to go down to the basement and measure my dish. It is currently in halves, so it is real easy for me to measure.
The diameter of my dish is 91 inches. The depth is 14 inches. I found and used a focal length forumula in this forum. I cam up with a focal length of 36.97 inches. Well, okay....Fine....
A co worker had this dish and gave it to me. I took some pics when i went to look at it the first time. I got a picture measuring the distance from the center of the dish to the feedhorn. It measured 32.750. I looked at the feedhorn and checked what the scaler was set on. It is set to 38.
The owner said they never had any issues and that they really liked having cband.
How can these measurement be different?
There is no way i can get 4 more inches from those struts. Surely i measure wrong, calculated wrong or something........
Can someone set me straight?
Pic attachedLast edited by steve515; 02-08-2010 at 07:15 PM.
- 02-08-2010 06:34 PM # ADS
Register Today & This Ad Goes Away! Circuit advertisement- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
- 02-08-2010 08:27 PM #2
i hope i don't get in trouble for c/p
but here goes
To calculate the focal distance, you need to measure the diameter (D) and the depth (d) of the dish. Measurements should be in like units (you can't use feet for the diameter and inches for depth). For this example, let's say we have a dish that is 120 inches in diameter (D) and 18 inches deep (d). Focal distance (f) equals the diameter squared (D x D) divided by 16 times the depth (16 x d) or:
D x D = 120 x 120 = 14400
16 x d = 16 x 18 = 288
D x D/16 x d = 14400/288 = 50
Therefore focal distance f = 50 inches
After you have calculated the focal distance (f), you can use that figure to calculate the f/D ratio of your dish. In this case, using the same diameter of (D) = 120; and the calculated focal distance (f) = 50
f / D = 50 / 120 = .416
f /D = .416
And round up to give a setting of .42.
Last edited by PANHANDLER; 02-08-2010 at 08:49 PM.
2-Pansat 3500, 1 Icon 550, 1 Fortec ,1 AZ Box elite, 1 Azbox Premium Plus
QPH-031 ,3 DMX741
Fortec Star 31",,Unimesh 7.5',, 8' Perfect 10,, 10' Prodelin
DG-380 Motor,, positioners Von Weise ,,Vantage ,, Thompson Saginaw,, 3 GBOX V3000
- 02-09-2010 05:39 AM #3
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- Dec 26th, 2009
- Location
- Ky
- Posts
- 41 Thread Starter
That is excactly what i did. And i still came up with a focal length of 36.97. When the dish was installed years ago, the feedhorn was set to about 32.750.
That is what i dont understand.
thanks
- 02-09-2010 06:42 AM #4
Your calculations seem correct, but I think your measurements are off. Your measurements would give an F/D of a bit above 0.40, not .38. I'm guessing that since the dish is in halfs, that it is sagging a bit, and the depth is smaller than you think. I tried a depth of 15" and that gives an F/D of closer to .38, and a FL of around 34". The sag of the dish would probably also cause the diameter to be off a bit.
Anyway, I'm guessing that when the dish is together, your measurements will be different.
- 02-09-2010 09:09 AM #5
my 10' sami mesh dish uses .38
- 02-09-2010 09:46 AM #6
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- Jun 8th, 2005
- Location
- Jacksonville, FL
- Posts
- 333
Focal length calculations assume a reflector that's true parabolic. It's possible that when the dish is assembled and you find the "sweet spot", you my find that the calculated focal point in not correct. Use the calculation as a starting point only, always adjust it in, out, and sideways to find the "sweet spot". Any warpage or variance from a true parabolic will move the focal point (sweet spot).
Harold
- 02-10-2010 10:22 PM #7
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- Mar 22nd, 2009
- Location
- Saskatchewan, Canada
- Posts
- 194
this might help you out...
- 02-11-2010 05:28 AM #8
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- Dec 26th, 2009
- Location
- Ky
- Posts
- 41 Thread Starter
I am using the right forumula and the math is correct. Its just that my answer is several inches away from the dish then where the feedhorn was originally installed years ago. Could the dish be warped? Yeah, i guess it could be. But by measuring it....It isnt.
I am not installing right now, and wont until march or april. I am just getting some things together at this point. I am stuck on this focal length though. I just dont understand why the original feedhorn is in a different location than what i calculated.
thanks
steve
- 02-11-2010 07:11 AM #9
Just because the feedhorn is mounted in this position and previous owner was receiving C-Band signals doesn't mean that the system was optimized. Signals can be received even if the feedhorn is mounted off center, crooked, incorrect skew or with an incorrect focal distance. The system will have better performance when the mechanicals are properly set.
I wouldn't be too concerned about this discrepancy at this point. It will be obvious if the feedhorn adjustment increases the SQ during the peaking of the installation.Brian Gohl - Satellite AV, LLC (Gold Sponsor)
Equipment Development / Distribution / Repair / Call Center
888-483-4673 - http://www.satelliteav.com
eBay Special Deals
Attention Installers: Want more work? Join the Largest Satellite Technician Referral Website - www.FTAinstall.com
- 02-26-2010 06:20 PM #10
I know that this thread is a bit old but I thought of a possible answer to your question, the effective aperture size that you input for the calculation was likely incorrect. If you measured 91 inches but the actual effective aperture size according to the manufacturer is a little less such as maybe 87 inches it will then calculate properly. The full diameter of the dish may not always be effective due to certain formed edges, etc.
I use the following and with your posted measurements I came up with the same length which contradicts the physical F/D as you noted.
Parabolic Reflector Analysis

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks