Those listed below are our PROUD SatelliteGuys GOLD Sponsors!
Applied Instruments DishStore.NET Home Theater Cruise glorystar.tv satelliteavgs tele-satellite.com

Welcome HOME to SatelliteGuys!


  •  » Looking for help picking a television provider?
  •  » Need Help with your Satellite System?
  •  » Need Advice on your Home Theater Setup?
  •  » Looking for the latest industry news and rumors?

...then you have come to the right place!

DIRECTV, DISH Network, FTA Satellite, Cable TV, HDTV even 3DTV!

We Can Help! We are known as America's Satellite Information Source!
YES! I want to register an account for FREE right now!

YOU ARE AT THE PLACE WHERE INDUSTRY EXPERTS HANG OUT!

p.s.: Registered members see a lot less ads! REGISTER TODAY!

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 14 of 14
  1. #11
    DrWho's Avatar
    DrWho is offline SatelliteGuys Regular
    Join Date
    May 11th, 2004
    Posts
    190
    ADVERTS 1
    Yeah, this is kind of ridiculous to add a Surround format that his harldy supported.

    Not that ESPN needs that much surround, but CS, come on!

  2. # ADS
    Register Today & This Ad Goes Away! Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many
     
  3. #12

    Help Keep SatelliteGuys For All, Click a Star and Become a Supporter! This Member did! Help Support The Site And Get Rid of the Syndicated Ads, This Member did! If you enjoy the site consider supporting it, this member did! Click a Star and become a Supporting Pub Member today!
    Join Date
    Mar 24th, 2004
    Posts
    1,049
    Thread Starter
    I'm not plugging it, but I've seen one from Marantz for about $400 at cambridge soundworks. I thought about upgrading, but it's not worth it. I can live with PLII

  4. #13
    theph0xx's Avatar
    theph0xx is offline SatelliteGuys Regular
    Join Date
    May 2nd, 2004
    Posts
    80
    From reading through the thread at AVS it seems as though CS was chosen because it was the best matrixing surround solution available to use at the time, and is likely to be more temporary than anything. ESPN didn't have a way to do DD 5.1 so it instead picked the matrix solution they thought best moved from 2 channel to a 5 channel sound. Like was said before, for those that don't have a receiver that decodes CS, it will be outputted in ProLogicII, assuming your receiver DOES decode that. If not, you're screwed and stuck with DD 2.0, with no surround effects. If your receiver actually does CS you get some added benefits over PL2, according to the SRS rep who was posting at AVS. I think that pretty much sums up the discussion over there, please correct me if anything is wrong here, but this is what I've drawn from it.

    To me I don't think it matters that much since most Rear noises are simply crowd noises that don't really rely on position to be immersing. Would I prefer 5.1? Of course, but I'm not gonna throw a fit about CS on one station. Hopefully, ESPN will begin to convert over to DD 5.1 as per the ATSC standard, especially given their new studio, capabilities, etc.

  5. #14
    theph0xx's Avatar
    theph0xx is offline SatelliteGuys Regular
    Join Date
    May 2nd, 2004
    Posts
    80
    One other thing:

    It seems as though CS is aimed at those who don't have a IRD/cable box that outputs a digital signal, only L/R. That's where the benefits of CS evidently come through because it allegedly does a GREAT job of giving the 5.1 effect from a 2.0 source. This "technology" doesn't seem to really be aimed at Voomers, HDTVers, Audiophiles, Videophiles, etc.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

SatelliteGuys.US | 46 Miami Avenue | Newington, Connecticut 06111
Links monetized by VigLink