Results 21 to 25 of 25
Thread: Antenna suggestion
-
LinkBack
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks- Bookmark & Share
- Digg this Thread!
- Tweet this thread
- 03-13-2010 10:29 PM #21
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- Aug 18th, 2008
- Location
- Arlington, Va
- Posts
- 240
ADVERTS 1
If you scroll towards the bottom of
this page
, there is a chart that shows"db gain over reference dipole" for various channels. Average gain for VHF-HI is 9.325db versus 8.2db for the HBU44. UHF average gain is 11.75db versus a dissapointing 8.2db for the HBU44 considering it's size.
- 03-13-2010 10:29 PM # ADS
Register Today & This Ad Goes Away! Circuit advertisement- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
- 03-14-2010 08:21 AM #22
SatelliteGuys Junkie
- Join Date
- Nov 15th, 2008
- Location
- Mt. Morris, Michigan
- Posts
- 1,513 Thread Starter
Why does it say the range is 40 miles VHF and and 30 miles UHF then? Typo maybe?
Originally Posted by No Static At All 
- 03-14-2010 08:42 AM #23
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- Jul 18th, 2004
- Location
- anywhere, michigan
- Posts
- 36
i use the winegard amplified sensor alot in your area
with good results
- 03-14-2010 08:56 AM #24
- Join Date
- Dec 12th, 2003
- Location
- Gunter, TX.
- Posts
- 7,378
Tomcat there is no standard for determining milage for reception of TV signals. Companies like Radio Shack are notorius for being generous in their milage estimates while old timers like Channel Master and Winegard have been more conservative in their promises. Their products will usually deliver what is promised and more milage. The other quality that you need to look at is quality of construction. Is an antenna that will last 2 yr. and cost you $25 a better buy than an antenna that will last 5 years but cost you $50. The quality of connectors and construction can affect your reception.
- 03-14-2010 05:45 PM #25
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- Aug 18th, 2008
- Location
- Arlington, Va
- Posts
- 240
I'm not sure why Winegard is so conservative with thier mileage estimates. Like I said, it just creates confusion when you see other brands with bloated numbers, so it's best not to rely on them for real world conditions. The gain numbers are a much better indicator of what to expect. Originally Posted by TomCat4680
It's kind of like deciding on a TV purchase based soley on advertised contrast ratios between different manufacturers. I base my decision on what my eyes see, and pay little or no attention to that particular specification.
Reply With QuoteTags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Bookmarks