TIVO vs E*

[jacmyoung]

You never used the term 'infringement' in the post I was replying too.......

Can you answer my question? Does the patent law allow or disallow infringement?

[vampz26]

Can you answer my question? Does the patent law allow or disallow infringement?

you never replied to my actual post, how can I answer your question if its based on an inaccurate reply?

the word infringement was never used in the original post or reply. The original post or reply has nothing to do with infringement.

You are playing word-substitution games...

I called you on it, and I'm right.

Ask a question based on the actual post and reply, and I will answer it. Substituting words for your own convenience is not an option.

[jacmyoung]

So was E*'s , but apparently its only ok for Tivo to 'steal'...lmao...

E* was found to infringe TiVo's patent. Was TiVo found to infringe E*'s patent?

No, TiVo was not infringing any E*'s patent, so as far as the patent law is concerned, "it is only ok for Tivo to 'steal'...lmao..." has no basis, am I right?

[vampz26]

E* was found to infringe TiVo's patent. Was TiVo found to infringe E*'s patent?

No, TiVo was not infringing any E*'s patent, so as far as the patent law is concerned, "it is only ok for Tivo to 'steal'...lmao..." has no basis, am I right?

Only when you said the ViP series has not been found to 'infringe'....

What Tivo is doing is stealing E*s right to invent and innovate where they failed too...and then control the outcome.

As well as hijacking and stealing the ViP technology with their latest patent onces they realized they had competition....

so yes, you are wrong, and so it Tivo.

[jacmyoung]

you never replied to my actual post, how can I answer your question if its based on an inaccurate reply?

the word infringement was never used in the original post or reply. The original post or reply has nothing to do with infringement. ...

In the original post, I mentioned the word "infringing" four times, but you caught my very first sentence, saying I did not use the word "infringement" but anyone with reasonable skill can understand I meant the law disallow infringement (i.e. "that" refers to "infringement.")

But you say so what you did not use the word infringement.

So now I made it more clear to you, when I used the word "that" it meant "infringement." I hope I have clarified it for you.

So let me ask again, does the patent law allow or disallow infringement?

[vampz26]

In the original post, I mentioned the word "infringing" four times, but you caught my very first sentence, saying I did not use the word "infringement" but anyone with reasonable skill can understand I meant the law disallow infringement (i.e. "that" refers to "infringement.")

But you say so what you did not use the word infringement.

So now I made it more clear to you, when I used the word "that" it meant "infringement." I hope I have clarified it for you.

So let me ask again, does the patent law allow or disallow infringement?

LMAO!!!

you DID! it MEANT what you wanted it to MEAN...lol...of course for your own convenience, I might add...

This conversation is over...consider yourself owned...

[jacmyoung]

Only when you said the ViP series has not been found to 'infringe'....

What Tivo is doing is stealing E*s right to invent and innovate where they failed too...and then control the outcome.

As well as hijacking and stealing the ViP technology with their latest patent onces they realized they had competition....

so yes, you are wrong, and so it Tivo.

But the 8 named DVRs were found to infringe, correct?

But you did not answer my question, on what basis did you say it was ok for TiVo to "steal?" Was TiVo found to infringe? If not, then on what basis did you say it was ok for TiVo to "steal?"

[jacmyoung]

LMAO!!!

you DID! it MEANT what you wanted it to MEAN...lol...of course for your own convenience, I might add...

This conversation is over...consider yourself owned...

Of course, I rest my case.

[vampz26]

But the 8 named DVRs were found to infringe, correct?

But you did not answer my question, on what basis did you say it was ok for TiVo to "steal?" Was TiVo found to infringe? If not, then on what basis did you say it was ok for TiVo to "steal?"

I answered it, go back and read it....

its not my fault you can't keep track of your own drivel and make up new meanings for what you say as you go along...

[vampz26]

Of course, I rest my case.

you didn't have a case to rest...you just make crap up as you go along...if you didn't say 'infringe', don't pretend you did. what you said was completely different, yet you won't even go back and address it...lol....

whatever...owned.