Results 51 to 60 of 237
Thread: Charlie Chat Recap 3-09-09
- 03-09-2009 10:30 PM #51
SatelliteGuys Junkie
- Join Date
- Dec 12th, 2006
- Location
- Central IL/SW FL/Big Island
- Posts
- 2,670
- 03-09-2009 10:30 PM # ADS
Paying The Bills With Google Adsense Circuit advertisement- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
- 03-09-2009 10:32 PM #52
- 03-09-2009 10:37 PM #53
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- Nov 23rd, 2008
- Posts
- 123
Considering Charlie's apparent preference for "HD" channels that air mostly 4:3 SD upscales, I'm surprised he's not begging TCM to launch an HD channel. Now THAT is a channel that airs mostly older films, and mostly in the old 1.37:1 (about 4:3) aspect ratio to ensure that all HD transfers from the oldest film is pillarboxed, his favorite kind of presentation on widescreen displays. I guess he wouldn't really want TCM HD either because TCM would be smart and air HD transfers of those 1.37:1 films, and he only really likes selling 4:3 SD content as new HD these days.
It's just such a shame. His company has huge potential, but it's almost as if every decision he makes is out of a combination of ignorance and a desire to directly oppose what subscribers have said they want. We're the stupid subscribers, and he's a genius (in his head, and only in his head). Raise prices, reduce quality, make false promises, and more! Truly amazing.
I'm beginning to wonder if he has been basing his recent decisions on clueless advisers or consultants of some kind. Something has definitely gone wrong in that company and it's starting to show in a bad way.
- 03-09-2009 10:38 PM #54
I called twice. The first time they asked what my question was (why FxNws and FxBnws HD were not in the "stand alone" HD packages) I was put on hold then transferred to CSR "SuJay" (one guess where she was from) who told me that Fox news and Fox business news were NOT in HD, when I referenced the website and channels 9476 and 9477 then she said "oh yes" they are in HD but only in the "Classic packages" I told her I knew this and the question was why didn't us HD only subs have them and would we be getting them. She just said that she didn't know why. I then asked for a supervisor and was told none were available but she would transfer me to a voicemail. I told her not to bother, hung up, and called charlie chat back. Again on hold, then spoke with Christy who said HD only packages would get them April 1st. I guess we shall see
Big Sky Country
______________
VIP 722, 211 and 211k receiver, HD Absolute forever remembered, now on 250. Great Falls, MT DMA.
- 03-09-2009 10:40 PM #55
- 03-09-2009 10:41 PM #56
I won the Nashville trip!
- 03-09-2009 10:41 PM #57
- 03-09-2009 10:41 PM #58
- 03-09-2009 10:42 PM #59HR-24 (2) + HD Locals + MRV + Internet
AV: Onkyo TX-SR606 + 5.1 Surround
DirecTV: Feb'11-Current (Dish: '08-'11)
- 03-09-2009 10:44 PM #60
Hey, that's why there's more than one provider. To some, these channels will be welcome: to others (like me) they will mean next to nothing. No Rainbow, no FX-HD, no Comcast, not even RFD-HD. Really, I couldn't care less about any of the new channels.
Not blaming Charlie: he's offering new national HD. Why these particular channels? Your guess is as good as mine.
Only one thing: Charlie, when you tell us that D* carries channels that "don't have any HD content", try to do it with a straight face.
-
Advertising
- SatelliteGuys.US
- has no influence
- on advertisings
- that are displayed by
- Google Adsense








LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote


Forum Threads
Bookmarks