Results 21 to 30 of 135
- 05-19-2009 01:54 PM #21
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- Aug 7th, 2008
- Location
- Maui
- Posts
- 193
- 05-19-2009 01:54 PM # ADS
Paying The Bills With Google Adsense Circuit advertisement- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
- 05-19-2009 02:37 PM #22
- 05-19-2009 04:13 PM #23
- 05-20-2009 08:21 AM #24
SatelliteGuys Senior
- Join Date
- Nov 28th, 2003
- Posts
- 994 Thread Starter
Nimiq 5 is a CONUS/CONCanada satellite only, no spotbeams. Still wonder if Dish will end up being able to use all 32 TPs on it similar to Ciel-2. I would expect Quetzsat-1 to have massive spotbeam capabilities for the U.S. I believe Dish will have use of 24 TPs on it and most should be used for spotbeams. It probably will be similar to Ciel-2. E-14 and E-15 should have more flexibility in their use since Dish owns them and based on past history, Dish is not reluctant to move satellites around to different slots depending on their changing strategy.
- 05-20-2009 08:37 AM #25
Looking at it further, seems Nimiq 5 will be a rather basic SS/L 1300, while Quetzsat 1 will be on the expanded 1300 frame, same as E11, E14, and E15.
Hey, here is a question: I know Dish can use 24 77W transponders for US service, and has to use 8 for Mexican service. Can Dish reuse those 8 TPs with spots focused in the Northern US?Welcome Pack, One solitary 622
My Very Basic Wish List: my local CW (WBNX) in HD, and subchannel guide info for WJW 8.2
- 05-20-2009 09:55 AM #26
SatelliteGuys Senior
- Join Date
- Nov 28th, 2003
- Posts
- 994 Thread Starter
I don't see why not. The only thing limiting is the cost of the satellite. Greater complexity drives greater power needs both which increase the weight of the satellite. Not only do the satellite costs go up but also the launch costs. Another question to be answered is if Dish gets use of all 32 TPs on Nimiq 5, can they put all or almost all CONUS programming both HD and SD on those 32 TPs using MPEG-4. If they can then Dish could use 61.5 W and 77 W almost exclusively for locals on spotbeams. Then Eastern Arc customers would only need to have dishes needed to pick up only two slots either 61.5 and 72.7 W or 72.7 and 77 W.
- 05-20-2009 10:15 AM #27
Even if they could do this, it would be more cost effective to just use the 1000.4, one dish to stock for WA, and it would give them more flexibility in case of failures..maintenance, etc, to be able to move things around between the 3 birds. Just like the 3 LNB dish was standard for DirecTV SD installations even though the customer might not have needed anything off of 110 and/or 119, especially if they were a SD customer.
- 05-20-2009 10:39 AM #28
Another problem for that is customers set up like me, with 110/119 and 61.5. Move all the HD to 72.7, and Dish has a lot of repoints to do in the Northeast US.
Dish certainly seems willing to buy high powered, complex satellites. Only concern is SES is buing Quetzsat-1, not Dish.Welcome Pack, One solitary 622
My Very Basic Wish List: my local CW (WBNX) in HD, and subchannel guide info for WJW 8.2
- 05-20-2009 11:19 AM #29
SatelliteGuys Senior
- Join Date
- Nov 28th, 2003
- Posts
- 994 Thread Starter
- 05-20-2009 12:59 PM #30
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- Aug 7th, 2008
- Location
- Maui
- Posts
- 193
-
Advertising
- SatelliteGuys.US
- has no influence
- on advertisings
- that are displayed by
- Google Adsense








LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

Forum Threads
Bookmarks