Results 41 to 50 of 135
- 06-18-2009 01:10 PM #41
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- Jul 22nd, 2008
- Location
- san juan
- Posts
- 134
ADVERTS
so echo 14is in danger of not being launched?
- 06-18-2009 01:10 PM # ADS
Paying The Bills With Google Adsense Circuit advertisement- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
- 06-18-2009 01:36 PM #42"Nothing on earth can stop the man with the right mental attitude from achieving his goal; nothing on earth can help the man with the wrong mental attitude"
-- Thomas Jefferson
CLICK HERE TO DONATE TO THE SATELLITEGUYS SERVER FUND
Click here for SatelliteGuys Folding@Home stats
My Stuff
Sony KDL-60EX701, Sony KDS-R60XBR2, Vizio VW32L, Vizio VX37L
SuperDish converted to 1000+, D500 for 61.5, Vip 622, 211, 211, 211k, 522
Panasonic SA-XR55, Polk R50 (2), Polk R15 (4), Polk CSi3 center, Yamaha sub
Toshiba HD-A2, Sony PS3, ROKU HD, Samsung BD-C5500
- 06-18-2009 02:21 PM #43
Final Design "subject to revison if coordination requires" is complete and was filed last winter.
Space Loral is the contractor.
There are two satellites with each taking half the load for the 114.5W slot.
The principle filing includes the narrative, original tech data and the Schedule S ( all the technical numbers for the satellite).
FCC INTERNATIONAL BUREAU
Click on "Other filings related to theis application" to see the chronology of followup submissions, and the comments from the competitors. It's fun to read the chronology.
- 06-18-2009 02:46 PM #44
They will not have problem launching,
Spectrum is arguing that while the Conus beam is within standards (Conus can be dialed in so it is not stronger than the original license for 119W), the 50 or so spotbeams on E14 create a bunch of "hot spots" that would affect their satellite spot beams. So it is about the operating power levels for the spots. And, the 15 Echostar 7 spotbeams would have priority over Spectrum spotbeams.
Both Directv and Echostar have been howling about faulty filings by Spectrum and lack of effort by Spectrum to coordinate, but apparantly to no avail (as of today).
- 06-18-2009 03:03 PM #45
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- Jul 22nd, 2008
- Location
- san juan
- Posts
- 134
any exact launch date?
- 06-18-2009 03:13 PM #46
- 08-13-2009 04:07 PM #47
SatelliteGuys Senior
- Join Date
- Nov 28th, 2003
- Posts
- 994 Thread Starter
Sorry to bring up a somewhat old thread but I did some research on the capabilities of commerical launch vehicles since there is a great deal of question about what vehicle that the E-14 satellite will be launched on because of its reported launch mass of 6308 kg. I believe that the E-14 satellite will be launched on a Proton becuase I don't think that mass is accurate to what will actually be launched but only reflects the mass if the fuel tanks are filled completely which rarely happens with satellites. Realize that satellite manufacturers such as Loral and Lockheed Martin don't manufacture their own tanks but buy from a tank vendor that has standard tank sizes so they will have to buy a bigger tank than they need otherwise their costs go up for a unique size tank. There are other reasons why you don't fill a propellant tank very close to its capacity related to pressure ratings but that's another discussion.
I base the launch of E-14 on a Proton from some information I found on the DirecTV-10 satellite that was launched on a Proton back in July of 2007. It had a total mass of 5893 kg but a dry mass i.e., without propellants of 3715 kg. The dry mass of E-14 as reported in the FCC filing is only 3223 kg. I realize Dish has had the propensity to move their satellites around recently and use more fuel but I still don't think a satellite that weighs about 500 kgs less than another is going to have 900 kgs more of propellant loaded on it than another. If you look at some of the projected schedules for Proton launches in early 2010, it appears there is some room for E-14 to go at that time.
- 08-13-2009 04:15 PM #48
Keep in mind, once on station, it really takes very little fuel to move to another location.
Reunite Pangaea!
- 08-13-2009 09:13 PM #49
Here is the Echostar Response to the Spectrum Five letter regarding interference and coordination.
http://licensing.fcc.gov/ibfsweb/ib....ent_key=727723
- 08-14-2009 12:39 AM #50
Spectrum 5 only exists to suppress competitors for money. Thing is you don't know who is supplying the money until you figure out who the complaint is against.
-
Advertising
- SatelliteGuys.US
- has no influence
- on advertisings
- that are displayed by
- Google Adsense








LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote


Forum Threads
Bookmarks