Results 121 to 129 of 129
- 07-15-2009 01:45 PM #121
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- Dec 16th, 2005
- Location
- Idaho Falls, ID
- Posts
- 429
- 07-15-2009 01:45 PM # ADS
Paying The Bills With Google Adsense Circuit advertisement- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
- 07-15-2009 02:12 PM #122
- 07-15-2009 03:27 PM #123
- 07-15-2009 03:43 PM #124
Media Switch = analog
Dan Minnick, vice president of software for EchoStar. Minnick also testified that there was no media switch. He also testified that after Echostar’s engineers met with TiVo’s engineers “early on”, they followed-up with Echostar’s inhouse counsel, Kerry Miller and that Miller gave them a verbal legal opinion over the telephone that Echostar did not infringe TiVo’s patent Minnick said “We know we don’t have a media switch because we broadcast in MPEG, we have no need for software that will convert (television signals) to MPEG.
Tivo pick a small town of Marshall, Texas, population 23,000, for their suit and U.S. District Judge David Folsom that doesn't understand technology that well.
U.S. Judge David Folsom yesterday denied that request and a hearing is scheduled for July 28 in Marshall, Texas.Last edited by JimK2; 07-15-2009 at 04:08 PM.
- 07-15-2009 03:54 PM #125
They are clueless.
- 07-15-2009 04:10 PM #126
Sure...its already been established that Tivo STOLE from replay...
...and I would have to say the real hard work in R and D was done by DishNetwork to produce a VASTLY superior product.
Which is why Tivo is looking to steal the true innovation from Dish.
Slapping a video capture card in a linux box based on an idea stolen from Replay is hardly R and D. Lol.
- 07-15-2009 04:22 PM #127
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- Apr 24th, 2008
- Posts
- 93
No, it is and always was purely digital.
Thus demonstrating a lack of understanding of the patent. Dan and the counsel probably needed to do a little more homework back then, or knowingly chose to misunderstand the patent in order to bolster their own belief that they were OK. Unfortunately for Dan, at trial that belief was proved wrong.Dan Minnick, vice president of software for EchoStar. Minnick also testified that there was no media switch. He also testified that after Echostar’s engineers met with TiVo’s engineers “early on”, they followed-up with Echostar’s inhouse counsel, Kerry Miller and that Miller gave them a verbal legal opinion over the telephone that Echostar did not infringe TiVo’s patent Minnick said “We know we don’t have a media switch because we broadcast in MPEG, we have no need for software that will convert (television signals) to MPEG.
You forgot that TiVo also bought a cow at the local county fair.Tivo pick a small town of Marshall, Texas, population 23,000, for their suit and U.S. District Judge David Folsom that doesn't understand technology that well.
TiVo most likely picked that town because of its reputation for handling these kinds of trials quickly which minimized lawyer costs. At the time, litigation costs were a big issue for TiVo, though not for Dish.
- 07-15-2009 05:12 PM #128
SatelliteGuys Junkie
- Join Date
- Jun 30th, 2007
- Location
- Sacramento, CA
- Posts
- 2,893
Please, TiVo picked that town like every other patentee did back then, because up to that point that little town's juries had the reputation of siding with the patentees 100% of the time, that was why.
But after the TiVo v. E* case, the tide began to turn. Several defendants, including E*, began to win their patent cases. One of the reasons they began to win the cases was because they changed their strategy.
Before then, most defendants tried to convince the jury of two things, no infringment, and the patent was not valid anyway even if infringement was true. That two pronged approach confused the jury in that little town, they were straight thinkers, they did not understand why one would first argue no I did not infringe, but then even if I infringed, the patent was not valid anyway. That strategy undermined the defendants' credibility.
If you do not infringe, then prove you do not, if the patent is not valid, then prove it is not, don't throw both at us, we are not lawyers.
E* changed their strategy the same year they lost the TiVo v. E* case, and won their case against Forgent, by convincing the jury only one thing, the Forgent patent was invalid, without ever trying to also prove to the jury they did not infringe.
Several other defendants in other patent cases did the same and won their cases. Since then, that little town became less and less of a favorite spot for the patentees.
As for TiVo buying a cow at that town, how much do you want to bet they did so after they got drunk in the parties at the local bars after winning their case?
Funny you even mentioned it.
- 07-15-2009 05:42 PM #129
Guys, you have beat this horse dead. It is no longer about the topic of the request for the sanction. We are done playing these stupid petty games. This one is closed, until there is more NEWS, and we will reopen a thread again to discuss it.
Herding Cats since 2007.
Dish: Vip722, 4.5 TB of External HDDs, Dish 1000.2, America 200 w/locals, Sony KDL-40XBR4 LCD, Apple TV, Toshiba HD A20 HD DVD, Magnavox BD MG500MG9, Denon AVR 1310 Receiver, Infinity sound.
HT Room: 106" Screen, Mitsi HC1500 720P projector, Dish vip622, Toshiba HD A2 HD DVD; Sony BDP-BX1 BD, Denon AVR788 7.1 receiver; Slingbox HD Pro.
Other: iPad 2; iPhone 4S; 13" core -i5 MacBook Air, 13" core i7 Macbook pro, Dell W7 PC
Follow me on twitter @rockymtnhigh , Email: rocky @ satelliteguys.us
-
Advertising
- SatelliteGuys.US
- has no influence
- on advertisings
- that are displayed by
- Google Adsense








LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

Forum Threads
Bookmarks