Those listed below are our PROUD SatelliteGuys GOLD Sponsors!
Applied Instruments DishStore.NET glorystar.tv satelliteavgs tele-satellite.com
Have a News Scoop For Us? >>> CONTACT US! <<<

Welcome HOME to SatelliteGuys.US!


  •  » Looking for help picking a satellite company?
  •  » Need Help with your Satellite System?
  •  » Need Advice on your Home Theater Setup?
  •  » Looking for the latest industry news and rumors?

...then you have come to the right place!
DIRECTV, DISH Network, FTA Satellite, Cable TV, HDTV even 3DTV...
We Can Help! We are known as America's Satellite Information Source!
YES! I want to register an account for free right now!
p.s.: Registered members see a lot less ads! REGISTER TODAY!

Page 13 of 13 FirstFirst ... 3 11 12 13
Results 121 to 129 of 129
  1. #121
    AdamGott is offline SatelliteGuys Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 16th, 2005
    Location
    Idaho Falls, ID
    Posts
    429
    ADVERTS
    Quote Originally Posted by philhu View Post
    I agree that the Tivo GUI interface is 'dated' It has not been updated since Series 1 but that is not the point here.



    BTW, The Tivo interface is going to look beautiful in a few months. I mean, georgeous!

    And I LOVE THE REMOTE. The original Peanut. If it is so bad, how come Harmony and most others now make Peanut remotes? You must hate all of them then. You must love the old square 1980's type remote, BOXY and big. Mmmmmmm
    I am surprised that TIVO did not patent the remote (e.g. the entire patent would read 'A remote control that has curves in the middle.'). Then they could be suing everyone else in the home entertainment field...

  2. # ADS
    Paying The Bills With Google Adsense Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many
     
  3. #122
    vampz26's Avatar
    vampz26 is offline SatelliteGuys Junkie
    Join Date
    Jan 20th, 2006
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    3,405
    Quote Originally Posted by AdamGott View Post
    I am surprised that TIVO did not patent the remote (e.g. the entire patent would read 'A remote control that has curves in the middle.'). Then they could be suing everyone else in the home entertainment field...
    I guess it beats actually working for a living.

  4. #123
    Curtis0620's Avatar
    Curtis0620 is offline SatelliteGuys Junkie
    Join Date
    Sep 8th, 2003
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    1,198
    Quote Originally Posted by vampz26 View Post
    I guess it beats actually working for a living.
    So the R&D time spent on the product doesn't count. TiVo didn't have the benefit of stealing it from someone else, like DISH did.

  5. #124
    JimK2's Avatar
    JimK2 is online now SatelliteGuys Regular
    Join Date
    Oct 2nd, 2006
    Posts
    532
    Quote Originally Posted by Greg Bimson View Post
    Again, TiVo met with DISH/SATS in 1999 regarding the possibility of making DVR's for Dish Network. TiVo even left a prototype there. I invite people to look up the court transcripts.

    Then somehow, the Media Switch ended up within all DVR's manufactured by DISH/SATS.

    Alas, this is OFF-TOPIC, so I'd appreciate we get this back on topic.
    Media Switch = analog

    Dan Minnick, vice president of software for EchoStar. Minnick also testified that there was no media switch. He also testified that after Echostar’s engineers met with TiVo’s engineers “early on”, they followed-up with Echostar’s inhouse counsel, Kerry Miller and that Miller gave them a verbal legal opinion over the telephone that Echostar did not infringe TiVo’s patent Minnick said “We know we don’t have a media switch because we broadcast in MPEG, we have no need for software that will convert (television signals) to MPEG.

    Tivo pick a small town of Marshall, Texas, population 23,000, for their suit and U.S. District Judge David Folsom that doesn't understand technology that well.

    U.S. Judge David Folsom yesterday denied that request and a hearing is scheduled for July 28 in Marshall, Texas.
    Last edited by JimK2; 07-15-2009 at 04:08 PM.

  6. #125
    Curtis0620's Avatar
    Curtis0620 is offline SatelliteGuys Junkie
    Join Date
    Sep 8th, 2003
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    1,198
    They are clueless.

  7. #126
    vampz26's Avatar
    vampz26 is offline SatelliteGuys Junkie
    Join Date
    Jan 20th, 2006
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    3,405
    Quote Originally Posted by Curtis0620 View Post
    So the R&D time spent on the product doesn't count. TiVo didn't have the benefit of stealing it from someone else, like DISH did.
    Sure...its already been established that Tivo STOLE from replay...

    ...and I would have to say the real hard work in R and D was done by DishNetwork to produce a VASTLY superior product.

    Which is why Tivo is looking to steal the true innovation from Dish.

    Slapping a video capture card in a linux box based on an idea stolen from Replay is hardly R and D. Lol.

  8. #127
    CuriousMark is offline SatelliteGuys Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 24th, 2008
    Posts
    93
    Quote Originally Posted by JimK2 View Post
    Media Switch = analog
    No, it is and always was purely digital.

    Dan Minnick, vice president of software for EchoStar. Minnick also testified that there was no media switch. He also testified that after Echostar’s engineers met with TiVo’s engineers “early on”, they followed-up with Echostar’s inhouse counsel, Kerry Miller and that Miller gave them a verbal legal opinion over the telephone that Echostar did not infringe TiVo’s patent Minnick said “We know we don’t have a media switch because we broadcast in MPEG, we have no need for software that will convert (television signals) to MPEG.
    Thus demonstrating a lack of understanding of the patent. Dan and the counsel probably needed to do a little more homework back then, or knowingly chose to misunderstand the patent in order to bolster their own belief that they were OK. Unfortunately for Dan, at trial that belief was proved wrong.

    Tivo pick a small town of Marshall, Texas, population 23,000, for their suit and U.S. District Judge David Folsom that doesn't understand technology that well.
    You forgot that TiVo also bought a cow at the local county fair.

    TiVo most likely picked that town because of its reputation for handling these kinds of trials quickly which minimized lawyer costs. At the time, litigation costs were a big issue for TiVo, though not for Dish.

  9. #128
    jacmyoung is offline SatelliteGuys Junkie
    Join Date
    Jun 30th, 2007
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    2,893
    Quote Originally Posted by CuriousMark View Post
    ...You forgot that TiVo also bought a cow at the local county fair.

    TiVo most likely picked that town because of its reputation for handling these kinds of trials quickly which minimized lawyer costs. At the time, litigation costs were a big issue for TiVo, though not for Dish.
    Please, TiVo picked that town like every other patentee did back then, because up to that point that little town's juries had the reputation of siding with the patentees 100% of the time, that was why.

    But after the TiVo v. E* case, the tide began to turn. Several defendants, including E*, began to win their patent cases. One of the reasons they began to win the cases was because they changed their strategy.

    Before then, most defendants tried to convince the jury of two things, no infringment, and the patent was not valid anyway even if infringement was true. That two pronged approach confused the jury in that little town, they were straight thinkers, they did not understand why one would first argue no I did not infringe, but then even if I infringed, the patent was not valid anyway. That strategy undermined the defendants' credibility.

    If you do not infringe, then prove you do not, if the patent is not valid, then prove it is not, don't throw both at us, we are not lawyers.

    E* changed their strategy the same year they lost the TiVo v. E* case, and won their case against Forgent, by convincing the jury only one thing, the Forgent patent was invalid, without ever trying to also prove to the jury they did not infringe.

    Several other defendants in other patent cases did the same and won their cases. Since then, that little town became less and less of a favorite spot for the patentees.

    As for TiVo buying a cow at that town, how much do you want to bet they did so after they got drunk in the parties at the local bars after winning their case? Funny you even mentioned it.

  10. #129
    rockymtnhigh's Avatar
    rockymtnhigh is offline Just Ask for Help! Proud SatelliteGuys Staff Member

    Proud Staff Member
    Join Date
    Apr 14th, 2006
    Location
    Normal, IL
    Posts
    23,767
    Guys, you have beat this horse dead. It is no longer about the topic of the request for the sanction. We are done playing these stupid petty games. This one is closed, until there is more NEWS, and we will reopen a thread again to discuss it.

    Herding Cats since 2007.

    Dish: Vip722, 4.5 TB of External HDDs, Dish 1000.2, America 200 w/locals, Sony KDL-40XBR4 LCD, Apple TV, Toshiba HD A20 HD DVD, Magnavox BD MG500MG9, Denon AVR 1310 Receiver, Infinity sound.
    HT Room: 106" Screen, Mitsi HC1500 720P projector, Dish vip622, Toshiba HD A2 HD DVD; Sony BDP-BX1 BD, Denon AVR788 7.1 receiver; Slingbox HD Pro.

    Other: iPad 2; iPhone 4S; 13" core -i5 MacBook Air, 13" core i7 Macbook pro, Dell W7 PC

    Follow me on twitter @rockymtnhigh , Email: rocky @ satelliteguys.us

Page 13 of 13 FirstFirst ... 3 11 12 13

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

SatelliteGuys.US | 46 Miami Avenue | Newington, Connecticut 06111
Links monetized by VigLink