Results 61 to 70 of 129
- 07-14-2009 01:05 PM #61
ADVERTS
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that the thoughts acquire speed the hands acquire shakes, the shakes serve as a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.
Don't be a freeloader! Get a Pub Membership today!
- 07-14-2009 01:05 PM # ADS
Paying The Bills With Google Adsense Circuit advertisement- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
- 07-14-2009 01:20 PM #62
SatelliteGuys Junkie
- Join Date
- Jan 21st, 2004
- Posts
- 1,863
You missed where I said DISH/SATS makes a very compelling case why the sanctions hearing should be delayed. This is probably one of DISH/SATS best executed plans in this whole incident. It would certainly be difficult for Judge Folsom to assess sanction-based damages for contempt when the finding is being reviewed. It appears from DISH/SATS brief that TiVo divided out the damages into categories and that any reversal from the Court of Appeals would cause a problem with any awarded sanctions.
Originally Posted by jacmyoung
- 07-14-2009 01:52 PM #63
SatelliteGuys Junkie
- Join Date
- Jun 30th, 2007
- Location
- Sacramento, CA
- Posts
- 2,893
It is not difficult for the judge to assess damages based on his own ruling, the only problem is his ruling is stayed, not in effect, cannot be enforced at this time, not just it is being reviewed.
If only his order were being reviewed but not stayed, E* would not have had any justification for the stay of the sanction proceedings.
In fact as it stands, it would have been better if TiVo had come out with a $2 or $5 billion bid, it would be easier for E* to tell the appeals court how ridiculous it is for the lower court to even entertain such idea when the appeals court had just ordered to stay the contempt ruling and the injunction.
Keep in mind the additional damages are based solely on the contempt ruling, which legally is not even standing at this time.
- 07-14-2009 01:54 PM #64
Do not forget that Echostar is PAYING for the use of the patented technology for upwards of 8 years now. That is definitely $1B worth of dish's profit using the technology.
And get over it, Tivo has a patent, Dish has been found infringing on it and then trying to get around it. Then stalling for years in court
They deserve all they get.
- 07-14-2009 01:56 PM #65
- 07-14-2009 02:12 PM #66
SatelliteGuys Junkie
- Join Date
- Jan 21st, 2004
- Posts
- 1,863
The reminder is that I am not a lawyer...
Originally Posted by jacmyoung
I thought only the Amended Final Judgment and Injunction Order was stayed? That document contains three items: damages during the stay, an order against infringements and an order to disable.
There is a separate order which grants TiVo's motion to find DISH/SATS in contempt. It is not stayed, but is being challenged by DISH/SATS.
- 07-14-2009 02:22 PM #67
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- Nov 11th, 2004
- Location
- Sunny South
- Posts
- 697
- 07-14-2009 02:37 PM #68www.sonicbabble.com The best non sat discussion on the net
- 07-14-2009 02:41 PM #69
SatelliteGuys Junkie
- Join Date
- Jun 30th, 2007
- Location
- Sacramento, CA
- Posts
- 2,893
We have a link to the appeals court order in the sticky thread, in it says:
EchoStar Corporation et al. (EchoStar) move for a stay, pending appeal, of the order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (1) holding EchoStar in contempt of its previous injunction, (2) enjoining EchoStar, and (3) requiring that EchoStar take certain steps in light of its contempt holdings.
Then:
Without prejudicing the ultimate disposition of this case by the merits panel, we determine based upon the arguments raised in the motions papers that EchoStar has met its burden of demonstrating the requisites for a stay of the order, pending appeal.
So all three items above are stayed. The first among them is the contempt ruling, the second of them is the injunction, the third of them is the kind of steps E* must take in light of the contempt holdings.
One of such steps is E* must brief the court what should be the proper additional sanctions against them in light of the contempt holdings. All parts of the order are stayed, as shall not be in effect until the appeals court rules in November.
- 07-14-2009 02:45 PM #70
-
Advertising
- SatelliteGuys.US
- has no influence
- on advertisings
- that are displayed by
- Google Adsense








LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks


, MRV, HR22-100, HR24-500 ,R16

Forum Threads
Bookmarks