Results 21 to 30 of 53
Thread: Dish sues Disney
- 08-05-2009 07:31 AM #21
- 08-05-2009 07:31 AM # ADS
Paying The Bills With Google Adsense Circuit advertisement- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
- 08-05-2009 08:34 AM #22
Is there any proof that ESPN (and indeed other networks in similar situations) have been unfair to DISH while being fair to all the rest? It just seems almost inconceivable that DISH constantly get treated unfairly while the rest rarely ever have similar complaints. It just seems to me that at least once a month, DISH has a complaint like this one directed at a particular network.
- 08-05-2009 10:49 AM #23
SatelliteGuys Junkie
- Join Date
- Dec 12th, 2006
- Location
- Central IL/SW FL/Big Island
- Posts
- 2,670
E* had contract language that guaranteed they would have best rates, i.e., no one should be getting a lower rate. Other carriers negotiate contracts with Disney. E* discovers they are not getting the best rates. E* sues. This is pretty typical legal behavior regardless of the industry.
- 08-05-2009 10:55 AM #24
ESPN: People are too much into sports.
Disney: Kids watch too much TV.
Drop the channels. Kids spend MORE time PLAYING sports. Two problems solved: TV prices are less, and fewer kids are overweight.---
Dish Network ViP722 w/Maxtor EHD; ViP622
AT&T 3G Wireless... and waiting for an alternative
---
- 08-05-2009 11:05 AM #25
SatelliteGuys Junkie
- Join Date
- Mar 19th, 2006
- Location
- San Joaquin Valley,CA.
- Posts
- 2,619
- 08-05-2009 12:58 PM #26
SatelliteGuys Senior
- Join Date
- Nov 28th, 2003
- Posts
- 994
If what Dish contends is true that they had it in their contract with ESPN/Disney then it doesn't matter what is typical in business. Besides I have seen where a business charges the same for quantities over a certain amount. Perhaps in this case that certain amount is 10 million subscribers.
- 08-05-2009 02:58 PM #27
The deal ends up in court because the 2 deals are probably not exactly the same for different amounts of money. Dish contends DIRECTV is getting a better deal and Dish should be entitled to the same pricing. I am sure ESPN's response will be that it is not the same deal, there are different terms and conditions that have an effect on the pricing so they do not have to cut the price given to Dish.
The judge will have to read both contracts and decided if indeed the most favored nations clause is in effect given the DIRECTV contract.
It could be that DIRECTV entered a contract with a longer term, or agreed to carry and pay for more channels than Dish did. DIRECTV could be qualifying for discounts that ESPN may be giving because of the contract length/channel carriage. ESPN might allow Dish to change to the same contract, but I bet Dish has something that they like in their contract that they do not want to give up and switch.
I doubt it is going to be a simple case.
- 08-05-2009 02:59 PM #28
I guess Dish buys thier leagal services in bulk. It's in the 3rd isle next to the 80lbs bags of dog food.
- 08-05-2009 04:20 PM #29
SatelliteGuys Senior
- Join Date
- Nov 28th, 2003
- Posts
- 994
- 08-05-2009 07:03 PM #30
first of all, its childish to bicker in front of everyone.
second, dish spend 6 million dollars a month sending out bills. please, whats one million dollars to DISNEY??????!!!! they probably spent one million dollars replacing the tires on the cars in the background of their latest children's series.
-
Advertising
- SatelliteGuys.US
- has no influence
- on advertisings
- that are displayed by
- Google Adsense








LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote



Forum Threads
Bookmarks