Results 1 to 10 of 66
- 08-26-2009 02:58 PM #1
Dish Statement on Tivo PTO Action
ADVERTS 1
DISH Network and EchoStar Statement Regarding Tivo and PTO Action
ENGLEWOOD, Colo. – Aug. 26, 2009 – DISH Network L.L.C., a subsidiary of DISH Network Corporation (NASDAQ: DISH), and EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., a subsidiary of EchoStar Corporation (NASDAQ: SATS), issued the following statement regarding recent developments in EchoStar Communications Corporation vs. Tivo:
“We are pleased the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) dismissed Tivo’s petition to vacate EchoStar’s re-examination of Tivo’s patent. In the decision, the Director of the Central Re-examination Unit of the PTO specifically found that ‘the references of record may be used to find that a substantial new question of patentability is present, [and] the decision of the [PTO] examiner has not been shown to be in error’ in granting EchoStar’s re-examination petition. The PTO’s decision clears the way for the re-examination to continue, which we believe will result in a Final Office Action invalidating the software claims of Tivo’s patent. These software claims are the very same claims that EchoStar was found to have infringed in the contempt ruling now pending on appeal.”Scott
- 08-26-2009 02:58 PM # ADS
Register Today & This Ad Goes Away! Circuit advertisement- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
- 08-26-2009 03:11 PM #2
I can hear the color drain from the collective faces at Tivo.
- 08-26-2009 03:20 PM #3
Time for another 40 page argument between the fanboys.
I'll LMAO if Tivo loses their patent. The millions Charlie has paid are a drop in the bucket compared to the cost of licensing.AT250, 622 and 612
My Very Basic Wish List: my local CW (WBNX) in HD, and subchannel guide info for WJW 8.2
- 08-26-2009 03:36 PM #4
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- Sep 13th, 2006
- Location
- Gastonia, NC
- Posts
- 441
I'm no legal person, but if you lose a case don't you have to pay some/all of the opposing parties legal fees?
- 08-26-2009 03:39 PM #5
Just more positioning. Who knows what this really means...
Receivers - 922, 722k with sling adapter, 211k,
Main Setup - Dish 1000.4 Den: Pioneer PDP 6020; Denon 3808ci, Paradigm 60s (fronts) and 590 (center); Living Room Panny GT25 42" Bedroom - Panny 50" G25
Tailgate Setup - 1000.2, 722k, 922, Honda Generator EU2000i, 2 Vizio 32" LCDs
- 08-26-2009 03:41 PM #6
SatelliteGuys Junkie
- Join Date
- Mar 19th, 2006
- Location
- San Joaquin Valley,CA.
- Posts
- 2,884
This is more interesting to me First the PTO upholds Tivo's Patent,now denies it? Something does not smell right about that.

TiVo Patent May Be Invalid - 2009-08-08 02:00:00 EDT | Multichannel News
- 08-26-2009 03:47 PM #7
All this means is that they want TiVo to show them why the patent is valid. Did anyone really expect anything else?
- 08-26-2009 04:09 PM #8
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- May 6th, 2005
- Location
- Hillsboro, OR
- Posts
- 99
TiVo Files Complaints for Patent Infringement Against AT&T and Verizon
This was posted by "orangeboy" over at Tivocommunity.
TiVo Files Complaints for Patent Infringement Against AT&T and Verizon
- 08-26-2009 04:17 PM #9
To be honest, I think everyone on both sides of the fence is tired of this case. In the short-term (lesss than 2-years), I think this PTO action means very little since the court is obligated to rule on the comtempt motion and award damages accordingly. In the long run...who knows, especially with Verizon and AT&T lawers getting involved.
- 08-26-2009 04:21 PM #10

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks