Those listed below are our PROUD SatelliteGuys GOLD Sponsors!
Applied Instruments DishStore.NET glorystar.tv satelliteavgs tele-satellite.com
Have a News Scoop For Us? >>> CONTACT US! <<<

Welcome HOME to SatelliteGuys.US!


  •  » Looking for help picking a satellite company?
  •  » Need Help with your Satellite System?
  •  » Need Advice on your Home Theater Setup?
  •  » Looking for the latest industry news and rumors?

...then you have come to the right place!
DIRECTV, DISH Network, FTA Satellite, Cable TV, HDTV even 3DTV...
We Can Help! We are known as America's Satellite Information Source!
YES! I want to register an account for free right now!
p.s.: Registered members see a lot less ads! REGISTER TODAY!

Page 10 of 87 FirstFirst ... 8 9 10 11 12 20 60 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 865
  1. #91
    GeorgeLV is offline SatelliteGuys Junkie
    Join Date
    Oct 27th, 2005
    Posts
    1,244
    ADVERTS
    Quote Originally Posted by vurbano
    No HD is 1920x1080i, 1920x 1080p or 1280 x 720p thats it. Laugh at calling it HDlite but it is. It has a definiton at AVS forum and the term has been used by Marc Cuban. I dont see how much more official the term needs to get myself.
    There's not much justification for saying 1280x720p is HD, yet 1280x1080i is not. What about the 1440x1080i format that the original Voom broadcasted? IMO, the main idea HDlite confers is that the video is being excessively bit starved, not that the frame size isn't an ATSC broadcast standard.


  2. # ADS
    Paying The Bills With Google Adsense Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many
     
  3. #92
    jsb_hburg's Avatar
    jsb_hburg is offline Supporting Founder Supporting Founder

    Help Keep SatelliteGuys For All, Click a Star and Become a Supporter! This Member did! Help Support The Site And Get Rid of the Syndicated Ads, This Member did! If you enjoy the site consider supporting it, this member did! Click a Star and become a Supporting Pub Member today!
    Join Date
    Sep 12th, 2003
    Posts
    299
    Mad Max 2 looked very soft.

    Ultra looks soft too, PQ-wise.

    I am very disappointed. I am hoping for a return to 1920 x 1080.

  4. #93
    rdinkel is online now Pub Member / Supporter Pub Member / Supporter

    Help Keep SatelliteGuys For All, Click a Star and Become a Supporter! This Member did! Help Support The Site And Get Rid of the Syndicated Ads, This Member did! If you enjoy the site consider supporting it, this member did! Click a Star and become a Supporting Pub Member today!
    Join Date
    Jul 13th, 2004
    Location
    Woodland Park, Colorado
    Posts
    1,354

    What about CBS-HD?

    With all the emphasis on Voom HD format, what is the format for CBS-HD on 61.5 and 148? And have there been any changes there?
    Woodland Park, CO
    City Above the Clouds

  5. #94
    Stargazer's Avatar
    Stargazer is offline Supporting Founder Supporting Founder

    Help Keep SatelliteGuys For All, Click a Star and Become a Supporter! This Member did! Help Support The Site And Get Rid of the Syndicated Ads, This Member did! If you enjoy the site consider supporting it, this member did! Click a Star and become a Supporting Pub Member today!
    Join Date
    Sep 7th, 2003
    Location
    Western WV
    Posts
    13,272
    Before or by the time they finally get all of these HD-Lite channels up there will be a newer HD out on the market or 3D. Satellite may never catch up. They may not have to worry about it if broadband and IPTV takes hold strongly enough, and if satellite cannot come up with something just as good if not better.

  6. #95
    Sarang is offline SatelliteGuys Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 30th, 2005
    Posts
    315
    Quote Originally Posted by Stargazer
    Before or by the time they finally get all of these HD-Lite channels up there will be a newer HD out on the market or 3D. Satellite may never catch up. They may not have to worry about it if broadband and IPTV takes hold strongly enough, and if satellite cannot come up with something just as good if not better.
    You know how much bandwidth 1080p takes? It's not coming, at least not many channels are coming in that format anytime soon so Dish has time. Besides it depends on the amount of channels. As it stands we're looking at 37-39 HD channels MAX being offered in the U.S. market by the middle of next year however I still wouldn't mind getting some foreign channels in HD as well, too bad NO content provider offers them.

  7. #96
    FreddyvsJasonvsAsh's Avatar
    FreddyvsJasonvsAsh is offline SatelliteGuys Senior
    Join Date
    Oct 20th, 2004
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    786
    Gamer IDs

    PSN ID: American_Thatter
    ok I thought Rainbow 1 was the best sat up there and could handle more then what they are giving us?

  8. #97
    Gary Murrell's Avatar
    Gary Murrell is offline SatelliteGuys Regular
    Join Date
    Jun 16th, 2005
    Location
    Prestonsburg, KY
    Posts
    465
    Thread Starter
    No other HD has been touched accept the 4 Voom channels that were 1920x1080i

    The 6000 handles 3 TRUE HD channels per transponder on 110, although the bitrates are lacking

    I understand what you are saying BFG, maybe something is different with 61.5/129 and the 6000 concerning 3 TRUE HD per transponder

    like I said before, Dish or Voom would have been better off providing 720p, that would have gave them the bandwidth room they need and keep picture quality top notch, as 1280x720p picture quality is superb

    now with considering the whole interlaced vs progressive, on these 1280x1080i channels we have:

    1280x540 now

    vs

    1920x540 before

    interlaced upon motion is only 540 lines, still shots is were 1080i looks best

    with 720p we would have 1280x720 instead of 1280x540

    1920x1080i gets it's pristine crisp look from the 1920 horizontal pixels of info

    this is a huge difference and anyone who thinks this 1280x1080i HD is not much different than TRUE 1920x1080i HD is dead wrong

    the hole point of TRUE 1080i HD is that is has high horizontal rez to offset the interlaced 1080 lines of vertical which is most of the time only 540(when there is motion)

    -Gary

  9. #98
    vurbano is offline Supporting Founder Supporting Founder

    Help Keep SatelliteGuys For All, Click a Star and Become a Supporter! This Member did! Help Support The Site And Get Rid of the Syndicated Ads, This Member did! If you enjoy the site consider supporting it, this member did! Click a Star and become a Supporting Pub Member today!
    Join Date
    Apr 1st, 2004
    Location
    Newport News, VA
    Posts
    23,049
    Quote Originally Posted by GeorgeLV
    There's not much justification for saying 1280x720p is HD, yet 1280x1080i is not. What about the 1440x1080i format that the original Voom broadcasted? IMO, the main idea HDlite confers is that the video is being excessively bit starved, not that the frame size isn't an ATSC broadcast standard.
    1440 was not HD either, but it looked much better then 1280. The 16:9 frame size is the same in all of these cases just the dimension of the individual pixel changes. Actually, I believe HDlite is not so much the bitstarving but rather the downrezzing that allows a reduced bitrate and a subsequent bandwidth savings for the provider. They lower the bitrate down to match the reduced bitrate demand of the lower resolution video. Once they hit the point where the picture is stable, i.e. no blocking etc, they have achieved the HDlite product.
    Last edited by vurbano; 12-04-2005 at 11:10 PM.

  10. #99
    Scott Greczkowski's Avatar
    Scott Greczkowski is online now Welcome HOME to Satellite Proud SatelliteGuys Staff Member

    Proud Staff Member
    Join Date
    Sep 7th, 2003
    Location
    Central Connecticut
    Posts
    68,558
    Gamer IDs

    PSN ID: scottct1
    I was watching the George Jones Soundstage special on RAVE and I noticed at points parts with fast motion looked like they were in slow motion.

  11. #100
    Gary Murrell's Avatar
    Gary Murrell is offline SatelliteGuys Regular
    Join Date
    Jun 16th, 2005
    Location
    Prestonsburg, KY
    Posts
    465
    Thread Starter
    I think Vurbano has hit the nail

    at least that is why I always understood providers lowering the resolution, so bitrate could be lowered and no pixelization occur, lower bitrates(or more satellite space effeciency) is all about what Dish is after no matter how they can get it, sadly this is the price

    anyone want to take wagers on how long it is before all HD on Dish is HD-Lite ??

    -Gary

Page 10 of 87 FirstFirst ... 8 9 10 11 12 20 60 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

SatelliteGuys.US | 46 Miami Avenue | Newington, Connecticut 06111
Links monetized by VigLink