Results 41 to 50 of 865
- 12-03-2005 03:41 PM #41
ADVERTS
everyone should drop the Voom channels and send a message
- 12-03-2005 03:41 PM # ADS
Paying The Bills With Google Adsense Circuit advertisement- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
- 12-03-2005 04:22 PM #42
Spike starts the chant:
FIBER OPTICS, FIBER OPTICS! Bring it on....
Could it be that the 129 satellite is so poor that they had to do this in order to get all of the VOOM channels on that satellite. Otherwise there is really no reason for this.Last edited by Spike; 12-03-2005 at 04:31 PM.
- 12-03-2005 04:49 PM #43
- Join Date
- Jun 16th, 2005
- Location
- Prestonsburg, KY
- Posts
- 465 Thread Starter
I changed some switches around so I could check 129 also, I will see if they are still identical mirrors of 61.5
99% sure they still are though
-GaryLast edited by Gary Murrell; 12-03-2005 at 04:51 PM.
- 12-03-2005 05:01 PM #44
- Join Date
- Jun 16th, 2005
- Location
- Prestonsburg, KY
- Posts
- 465 Thread Starter
so far I see the headers are different on 129, all Voom headers on 129 read 18 Mbps instead of 16 Mbps listed on 61.5
this is useless info though, but I don't know why they would be different if they are exact mirrors
-GaryLast edited by Gary Murrell; 12-03-2005 at 05:03 PM.
- 12-03-2005 05:54 PM #45
Good lord...the channels look like crap now.
I fired off my email about it, though it probably won't do much good if they've already struck this deal over resolution.
- 12-03-2005 06:02 PM #46
Proud Staff Member
Proud SatelliteGuys Staff Member - Join Date
- Oct 13th, 2003
- Posts
- 2,291
Proud Staff Member
Originally Posted by Smith, P.
Check to make sure your browser doesnt auto resize images. If you right click and save as, they should be 1920x1088. I had the same problem with IE resizing them and getting 1114x631.
All the voom caps came from 61.5, I briefly looked at 129 but they looked the same. Gary, I did notice the discrepancy with the headers, but like you said that doesn't really mean much.Last edited by HokieEngineer; 12-03-2005 at 06:04 PM.
- 12-03-2005 06:09 PM #47
Good lord...the channels look like crap now.
I fired off my email about it, though it probably won't do much good if they've already struck this deal over resolution.
- 12-03-2005 06:14 PM #48
I emaile dish quality and no responce back so far..
Any posts on this forum are my personal thoughts and do not represent the views or reflections of my current employer!
- 12-03-2005 06:19 PM #49Dont expect much of a response...I just got this back from mine:
Originally Posted by goaliebob99
Thank you for taking the time to comment on the quality of the Dish Network. We have received your email and will be looking into the concerns you have identified. Your comments are important to us. Through our own cutting edge technology and your feedback, we will continue to improve the already superior quality of our service.
This email address is primarily for service quality issues to aid the Quality Assurance Team in the continuing effort of providing our customers with the best possible picture and sound. While each comment is reviewed, due to the amount of email that is directed to our mailbox, we can not respond to each individually.
(deleted paragraph of email links)
Again, thank you for the feedback.
Sincerely,
Dish Network Quality Assurance Team
- 12-03-2005 06:32 PM #50
Got same E-mail back... last time that I E-mailed them I got several responses though...
C-Band FAQ's, The List, SatelliteGuys Cutting Edge, Home Theater Equipment, Primetime,
2012 CES, droids
dfergie@SatelliteGuys.US
For Breaking Satellite Industry News, Please Click Here
-
Advertising
- SatelliteGuys.US
- has no influence
- on advertisings
- that are displayed by
- Google Adsense








LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

Forum Threads
Bookmarks