Thinking of moving to DirecTV, for HD...is this crazy?

**davec53** · 11-22-2006 03:16 PM

i live in a "white area", and i got my LiL out of Lexington, KY. they don't offer HD versions on either Dish OR Direct right now, BUT, if i go with Direct, I can get distant networks in HD, and still keep my "local" channels in SD.

i know that Dish is the HD leader right now, but from what DTV is saying, they'll have the ability to offer 150 national HD channels and over 1,000 locals when their 2 birds go up next year....what has Dish got lined up? will they even be close to being able to compete with that number when, and if, it happens?

i just worry that Dish is going to fall behind on HD programming, and i'm ready to make the upgrade, so i have to decide which one to put my money on. i'm already a Dish subscriber, and I love my 522....and the only reason i haven't already pulled the trigger and gone with Direct is that their HD-DVR doesn't have dual outputs like the 622.

we record a lot of stuff and like being able to watch it in either the living room or the bedroom.

all that aside, however...who do you like in the race for dominating the HD market...Dish, or DTV?

thanks!

**stone phillips420** · 11-22-2006 03:23 PM

right now leader is dish, but give it time and imho directv will be the undisputed champion of hd programming after they get there 2 new birds up

**mdonnelly** · 11-22-2006 03:26 PM

If you want to go to D*, go ahead. But, don't go expecting to get 150 national HD and 1000 local HD channels. There aren't that many HD channels out there yet, and won't be for awhile.

D* and E* will play leapfrog. Right now E* is in the lead. Next year it might be D*. After that E* again. ............

**Smith, P.** · 11-22-2006 03:29 PM

We're still talking about HD-Lite of DN channels, but keep inmind - DirecTV already SUED for thier sub-HD channels

.

**jayn_j** · 11-22-2006 03:39 PM

Given the past record for both companies, I would never make a major commitment based on rumors of future capabilities. It simply isn't going to happen the way you think it will, and who knows what Charlie will come up with in the meantime.

Jump because of something that IS, not something that MIGHT BE.

**Smith, P.** · 11-22-2006 03:46 PM

That was good pragmatical advise !

**davec53** · 11-22-2006 04:09 PM

Originally Posted by jayn_j

Given the past record for both companies, I would never make a major commitment based on rumors of future capabilities. It simply isn't going to happen the way you think it will, and who knows what Charlie will come up with in the meantime.

Jump because of something that IS, not something that MIGHT BE.

hmmmm....can't argue with that logic.

**whatchel1** · 11-22-2006 04:21 PM

The new sats that D* is putting up is in a that has had little use or testing. So they may work great or it may be problematic.

**Poke** · 11-22-2006 04:26 PM

All Direct is doing is adding more Locals in HD. They still will not have as many as Dish so Dish still has 30 channels of HD. Direct only has about 10 plus your 4 locals so total about 14-15 at the most. Even after Direct puts up more birds Dish will still have more. So there is only so many nantional HD channels and Dish has most of them more than Direct. So if anyone right now goes to Direct for HD it would be a step backwards.

**davec53** · 11-22-2006 04:32 PM

but i wonder how long it might be before the locals for lexington will make it up to Dish in HD? they aren't really blazing any trails on that front right now, it seems. they started off great, but not so much any more.

heck, if they'd offer something more than just CBS-HD to those folks like me who don't have access to LiL HD channels yet, this wouldn't even be a question. (also would be pretty happy if i hadn't lost my distants from Denver...dangit!)