| Welcome to SatelliteGuys.US - America's Most Popular Satellite Information Forum!!
You are currently viewing our forums as a guest which gives you limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post & reply messages in our forum, play in our fun arcade and communicate privately with other members as well as enjoy many other members only features.
Also as a registered member you will also see much less advertising!
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
CLICK HERE TO REGISTER! |  | | 
11-06-2008, 03:36 PM
| | Pub Member / Supporter | | Pub Member / Supporter Join Date: Dec 8th, 2007 Location: Where it's Warm
Posts: 848
| | | Echostar Tweeners Echostar has a permit for a tweener BSS satellite at 86.5W and Spectrum Five has a tweener BSS permit for 114.5W.
In browsing the FCC files, I stumbled onto this nugget. Dish has leased 100 percent of the capacity on a pending (no permit issued yet) BSS tweener at 105.5W. SES would be the owner and the permit is waiting approval with opposition from Directv (similar opposition to what we saw with 86.5W and 114.5W before those permits were issued).
From Directv's opposition included in the filing: "Indeed, SES has already leased "the entire communications capacity ( including all spare capacity)" on its proposed tweener at the 105.5 W.L. orbital location to Echostar - foreclosing the opportunity for new entry from that slot"
| 
11-06-2008, 03:51 PM
|  | Pub Member / Supporter | | Pub Member / Supporter Join Date: May 13th, 2008 Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 2,845
| | |
Glad to here dish is finally making some moves to acquire more bandwidth. Any word on the 107W Ka bandwidth they were getting (I think)?
To bad no one is pointed at these slots.
| 
11-06-2008, 04:05 PM
|  | Pub Member / Supporter | | Pub Member / Supporter Join Date: Jul 20th, 2005 Location: Northern VA
Posts: 11,434
| |
Err- not to Dish, to Echostar. Can be used for other purposes, no? Business applications, maybe. No guarantee it's for us at home. It would require yet another forest of dishes, anyway.
| 
11-06-2008, 05:39 PM
| | Pub Member / Supporter
Topic Starter
| | Pub Member / Supporter Join Date: Dec 8th, 2007 Location: Where it's Warm
Posts: 848
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by navychop Err- not to Dish, to Echostar. Can be used for other purposes, no? Business applications, maybe. No guarantee it's for us at home. It would require yet another forest of dishes, anyway. | This is a full conus TV satellite with special coverage for Alaska and Hawaii. If I lived in one of those two states, I would be hounding my senators and representatives as to why the FCC is not moving faster on the permit application. Application says AMC 14 was originally scheduled for this slot and then was moved to 61.5W ( bad luck there) because of FCC dragging (something like 7 years now since the original application and nearly 2 years since the last revision).
| 
11-06-2008, 06:13 PM
|  | Pub Member / Supporter | | Pub Member / Supporter Join Date: May 13th, 2008 Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 2,845
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by nelson61 This is a full conus TV satellite with special coverage for Alaska and Hawaii. If I lived in one of those two states, I would be hounding my senators and representatives as to why the FCC is not moving faster on the permit application. Application says AMC 14 was originally scheduled for this slot and then was moved to 61.5W ( bad luck there) because of FCC dragging (something like 7 years now since the original application and nearly 2 years since the last revision). | They were going to use a sat at 86.5 for Ak and HI? Isn't that a little east for them? 148 would make more sense, and Dish already has that slot.
| 
11-06-2008, 06:59 PM
| | Pub Member / Supporter
Topic Starter
| | Pub Member / Supporter Join Date: Dec 8th, 2007 Location: Where it's Warm
Posts: 848
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by HDRoberts They were going to use a sat at 86.5 for Ak and HI? Isn't that a little east for them? 148 would make more sense, and Dish already has that slot. | It's 105.5W with SES as owner. Since it would be a leased slot/satellite, Echostar/Dish would be getting in with little upfront investment.
| 
11-06-2008, 07:27 PM
|  | Supporting Founder | | Supporting Founder Join Date: Sep 25th, 2003 Location: Wichita Falls, TX
Posts: 6,207
| | |
Dish has been working on 86.5 and supposedly has a satellite under construction. The 105.5 with SES has been going on for a very long time.
| 
11-06-2008, 08:19 PM
|  | Pub Member / Supporter | | Pub Member / Supporter Join Date: May 13th, 2008 Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 2,845
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by nelson61 It's 105.5W with SES as owner. Since it would be a leased slot/satellite, Echostar/Dish would be getting in with little upfront investment. | Still seems like 148 would be better for AK/HI. I would think you may be able to ag 4.5 extra degrees to a Dish 1000 and get to 105.5 to expand bandwidth. Plus an LNB for 107 Ka. A constellation like that visible with a single Dish would give Dish plenty of bandwidth.
| 
11-06-2008, 09:10 PM
| | SatelliteGuys Senior | | Join Date: Nov 28th, 2003
Posts: 822
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by nelson61 Echostar has a permit for a tweener BSS satellite at 86.5W and Spectrum Five has a tweener BSS permit for 114.5W.
In browsing the FCC files, I stumbled onto this nugget. Dish has leased 100 percent of the capacity on a pending (no permit issued yet) BSS tweener at 105.5W. SES would be the owner and the permit is waiting approval with opposition from Directv (similar opposition to what we saw with 86.5W and 114.5W before those permits were issued).
From Directv's opposition included in the filing: "Indeed, SES has already leased "the entire communications capacity ( including all spare capacity)" on its proposed tweener at the 105.5 W.L. orbital location to Echostar - foreclosing the opportunity for new entry from that slot" | This FCC filing is very old. The AMC-14 satellite that failed make it to 61.5 W was suppose to go to 105.5 W but after the FCC failed to approve its usage at 105.5 W, Dish had AMC-14 modified to be used at 61.5 W. Of course AMC-14 is useless to Dish now and I don't think the 105.5 W DBS tweener slot will ever be used in the U.S.
| 
11-06-2008, 09:53 PM
| | Pub Member / Supporter
Topic Starter
| | Pub Member / Supporter Join Date: Dec 8th, 2007 Location: Where it's Warm
Posts: 848
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by rocatman This FCC filing is very old. The AMC-14 satellite that failed make it to 61.5 W was suppose to go to 105.5 W but after the FCC failed to approve its usage at 105.5 W, Dish had AMC-14 modified to be used at 61.5 W. Of course AMC-14 is useless to Dish now and I don't think the 105.5 W DBS tweener slot will ever be used in the U.S. | I don't think 2007 is old.
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:54 PM. |