| Welcome to SatelliteGuys.US - America's Most Popular Satellite Information Forum!!
You are currently viewing our forums as a guest which gives you limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post & reply messages in our forum, play in our fun arcade and communicate privately with other members as well as enjoy many other members only features.
Also as a registered member you will also see much less advertising!
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
CLICK HERE TO REGISTER! |  | | 
07-14-2009, 01:54 PM
|  | Pub Member / Supporter | | Pub Member / Supporter Join Date: Jan 20th, 2006 Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,398
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by msmith198025 Satisfaction? | Lol...call me when 'satisfaction' pays the light bill...
__________________
Has never trolled a D* thread. That means I have more class than most people who can't resist trolling E* threads.  Truth hurts.
| 
07-14-2009, 02:00 PM
|  | Pub Member / Supporter | | Pub Member / Supporter Join Date: Jan 20th, 2006 Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,398
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike0616 Thanks for the best laugh I have had in years!
While we are at it, lets abolish all patents. No, wait, that is not enough, lets abolish all laws, make it survival of the fittest. Happy now?
See you on the street, if you dare to come out!     | Hey...considering how antiquated and corrupt things are, abolishment may not be a bad idea! Seriously, we are due for a complete overhaul of the system and that right soon!
__________________
Has never trolled a D* thread. That means I have more class than most people who can't resist trolling E* threads.  Truth hurts.
| 
07-14-2009, 02:11 PM
| | SatelliteGuys Junkie | | Join Date: Jun 30th, 2007 Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,853
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by jacmyoung We have a link to the appeals court order in the sticky thread, in it says: Then: So all three items above are stayed. The first among them is the contempt ruling, the second of them is the injunction, the third of them is the kind of steps E* must take in light of the contempt holdings. One of such steps is E* must brief the court what should be the proper additional sanctions against them in light of the contempt holdings. All parts of the order are stayed, as shall not be in effect until the appeals court rules in November. | It is very interesting to note that E* in their filings to the appeal court did not even specify such complete list of items to be stayed, they only specified that the judge’s 6/2/09 injunction should be stayed.
Yet the appeals court on its own initiation decided their stay order pretty much should cover all aspects of the judge’s order, so much so they specifically listed all three categories of the items just to be sure everything was stayed.
Such initiation underscores the appeals court view that E* had established strong likelihood of success on the merits. | 
07-14-2009, 02:17 PM
|  | Supporting Founder | | Supporting Founder Join Date: Apr 7th, 2004 Location: Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 13,749
| | |
People scoffed when I mentioned this would cost Dish Network upwards of a billion dollars before all was said and done. So far $205 million has been awarded to Tivo for infringement of their IP, and I am sure E* has spent more than 25 million in legal fees so far. This matter would have been resolved so much cheaper if Charlie would have entered into an licensing agreement with Tivo after they lost the original case and subsequent appeal. There is a time to fight and there is a time to sign a peace agreement when you're having your ass repeated handed to you. In this case, Charlie decided to fall on his sword and Dish Network is bleeding out. This could have been avoided.
| 
07-14-2009, 02:29 PM
| | SatelliteGuys Junkie | | Join Date: Jan 21st, 2004
Posts: 1,628
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by jacmyoung Yet the appeals court on its own initiation decided their stay order pretty much should cover all aspects of the judge’s order, so much so they specifically listed all three categories of the items just to be sure everything was stayed. | But there is another order. That is the one granting TiVo's motion for contempt.
| 
07-14-2009, 02:50 PM
| | SatelliteGuys Junkie | | Join Date: Jun 30th, 2007 Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,853
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Bimson But there is another order. That is the one granting TiVo's motion for contempt. | There was not a single "the order" that covered all three items above, therefore "the order" meant to cover them all, as specified by the three items, regardless which specific order the judge issued on 6/2/09.
BTW, as I stated in another forum, not suprisingly Judge Folsom decided to go for the 7/28 sanction hearing, but he said he would not enforce the sanction pending E*'s appeal.
It is time for E* to appeal this decision again | 
07-14-2009, 02:59 PM
| | SatelliteGuys Junkie | | Join Date: Jan 21st, 2004
Posts: 1,628
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by jacmyoung There was not a single "the order" that covered all three items above... | The Amended Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction somewhat covered all three items. It certainly mentions the finding of contempt, as well as the enjoining of DISH/SATS and the requiring of DISH/SATS to take certain steps in light of the contempt finding.
We'll see the motions regarding the sanctions hearing at the Court of Appeals shortly. | 
07-14-2009, 03:04 PM
|  | Proud Staff Member | | Proud Staff Member Join Date: Apr 14th, 2006 Location: U.S.S. George Hammond
Posts: 17,256
| | |
Folks, stay on topic. And the topic is the amount of the sanctions being sought by Tivo in terms of the contempt.
__________________
"In the world of emoticons, I'm colon capital D."
Dish: Vip722, 2.5 TB of External HDDs, Dish 1000.2, HD Plat. w/locals, Sony KDL-40XBR4 LCD, Toshiba HD A20 HD DVD, Magnavox BD MG500MG9, Sony STR-DE998 7.1 Receiver, Infinity sound.
HT Room: 106" Screen, Mitsi HC1500 720P projector, Dish vip622, Toshiba HD A2 HD DVD; Sony BDP-BX1 BD, Denon AVR788 7.1 receiver; Slingbox HD Pro. View My Equipment , rocky@satelliteguys.us If You Benefit from this site Click Here to Become a Supporting Member | 
07-14-2009, 03:19 PM
| | SatelliteGuys Junkie | | Join Date: Jun 30th, 2007 Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,853
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Bimson The Amended Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction somewhat covered all three items. It certainly mentions the finding of contempt, as well as the enjoining of DISH/SATS and the requiring of DISH/SATS to take certain steps in light of the contempt finding.
We'll see the motions regarding the sanctions hearing at the Court of Appeals shortly.  | Do you not agree that "finding of contempt" is stayed? Meaning legally the contempt finding is not in effect.
As far as E*'s appeal, I said they would appeal based on their history of appealing every order  As far as I am concerned, they do not have to appeal either, because the judge said he would not enforce the sanctions anyway, until the appeals court ruled in November.
The thing E* must avoid is to have this sanction hearing, and the judge renders a money judgment, then enforces it right the way, if so E* will likely have to put up another bond. Otherwise it is just a few briefings and a 30-min stand-in in the court on 7/28 by the lawyers, no big deal. In fact I would like to see how the judge deals with TiVo's $1 billion bid.
| 
07-14-2009, 04:08 PM
|  | Proud Staff Member | | Proud Staff Member Join Date: Apr 14th, 2006 Location: U.S.S. George Hammond
Posts: 17,256
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by jacmyoung Do you not agree that "finding of contempt" is stayed? Meaning legally the contempt finding is not in effect.
As far as E*'s appeal, I said they would appeal based on their history of appealing every order  As far as I am concerned, they do not have to appeal either, because the judge said he would not enforce the sanctions anyway, until the appeals court ruled in November.
The thing E* must avoid is to have this sanction hearing, and the judge renders a money judgment, then enforces it right the way, if so E* will likely have to put up another bond. Otherwise it is just a few briefings and a 30-min stand-in in the court on 7/28 by the lawyers, no big deal. In fact I would like to see how the judge deals with TiVo's $1 billion bid. |
Look, it is on HOLD. It has not been eliminated; it is "stayed" pending the appeal. Simple. Return to the status quo.
And we now know that Tivo has sought about one billion dollars in damages. And thus, we are right back to where we were a week or so ago, just a little more info.
__________________
"In the world of emoticons, I'm colon capital D."
Dish: Vip722, 2.5 TB of External HDDs, Dish 1000.2, HD Plat. w/locals, Sony KDL-40XBR4 LCD, Toshiba HD A20 HD DVD, Magnavox BD MG500MG9, Sony STR-DE998 7.1 Receiver, Infinity sound.
HT Room: 106" Screen, Mitsi HC1500 720P projector, Dish vip622, Toshiba HD A2 HD DVD; Sony BDP-BX1 BD, Denon AVR788 7.1 receiver; Slingbox HD Pro. View My Equipment , rocky@satelliteguys.us If You Benefit from this site Click Here to Become a Supporting Member | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:43 AM. |