Follow Us On TWITTER | FREE iPhone/iPad App!
Those listed below are our PROUD SatelliteGuys GOLD Sponsors!
Applied Instruments DishStore.NET

» Advertising
Register Today and many of these ads go away!


Welcome to SatelliteGuys.US - America's Most Popular Satellite Information Forum!!

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest which gives you limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post & reply messages in our forum, play in our fun arcade and communicate privately with other members as well as enjoy many other members only features.

Also as a registered member you will also see much less advertising!

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER!

Go Back   SatelliteGuys.US > Signals From The Sky > The Dish Network Forum > Dish Network - Technical Discussions
Sponsored Links

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1    (permalink
Old 12-13-2009, 09:50 PM
SatelliteMike's Avatar
SatelliteGuys Freshman
 
Join Date: Oct 1st, 2009
Location: Northern Kentucky
Posts: 7
Non standard configuration

Sponsored Links
I have to add a surveillance feed into an 6 box installation that includes 722K/222K/222K. Customer switched from Direct TV, and the feed was on the VHF/UHF input on a 5 x 8 multi-switch. Customer surveillance system travels on channel 65, and customer wants to have it on all 6 TV's. With all the double diplexers and splitters required to add into Dish system, I'm suspecting significant signal degradation at both TV1 and TV2 on all 3 receivers. I'm looking for a simpler solution, but haven't been looking at the newer technology, so thought I'd see what others would suggest.
Thanks in advance for any and all ideas.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2    (permalink
Old 12-14-2009, 08:24 AM
SatelliteGuys Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 12th, 2003
Location: Celina, TX.
Posts: 6,216
Using a lower channel on the modulator will reduce signal loss. Adding a signal amplifier will offset the loss. DISH dosen't have any elegant NTSC signal distribution solutions.
Reply With Quote
  #3    (permalink
Old 12-14-2009, 08:48 AM
SatelliteGuys Junkie
 
Join Date: May 5th, 2007
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 4,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by boba View Post
DISH dosen't have any elegant NTSC signal distribution solutions.
Using a quality four-way splitter (joiner) and a DA is probably the best solution. The DA avoids a couple of points of insertion loss.

DIRECTV's current "elegant solution" is to recommend against diplexing altogether.
Reply With Quote
  #4    (permalink
Old 12-14-2009, 11:03 AM
SatelliteMike's Avatar
SatelliteGuys Freshman
Topic Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 1st, 2009
Location: Northern Kentucky
Posts: 7
Thanks folks, both options good ones. Surveillance feed from signal translator is limited to channels 61 - 70, so lower channel options null; I neglected to specify the need for a clean insertion to complement the rest of the equipment in the mechanical room. I'm thinking the addition of 3 OTA modules to the receivers, using the existing Direct TV multi switch as a splitter with a direct feed to the OTA units in the receivers. Had I been able to get on-line earlier, I might have been found out about an OTA unit available for the 222K/722K receivers. Thanks for the input, time to try out this option. I'll post the results after the install is finished. Can we post pictures?
Reply With Quote
  #5    (permalink
Old 12-14-2009, 12:51 PM
SparksPA's Avatar
SatelliteGuys Freshman
 
Join Date: Nov 3rd, 2009
Location: In the mountains of Central PA
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by SatelliteMike View Post
... I'll post the results after the install is finished. ...
Yes, please do! I am planning a new installation and will be doing the same thing. I thought that it would be easy by just using an analog frequency agile multi-channel modulator and inserting the new home-made channels along with the OTA antenna feed to the OTA tuners. I have since learned that the OTA tuners on the 722K are digital only so it's back to the drawing boards!

Please allow one newbie to welcome another newbie. Fear not, the natives are friendly! There are a LOT of really GREAT folks 'round here!
Reply With Quote
  #6    (permalink
Old 12-14-2009, 02:40 PM
SatelliteGuys Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 29th, 2004
Posts: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by SatelliteMike View Post
Thanks folks, both options good ones. Surveillance feed from signal translator is limited to channels 61 - 70, so lower channel options null; I neglected to specify the need for a clean insertion to complement the rest of the equipment in the mechanical room. I'm thinking the addition of 3 OTA modules to the receivers, using the existing Direct TV multi switch as a splitter with a direct feed to the OTA units in the receivers. Had I been able to get on-line earlier, I might have been found out about an OTA unit available for the 222K/722K receivers. Thanks for the input, time to try out this option. I'll post the results after the install is finished. Can we post pictures?
You're going to have to get the security system channel (ntsc/rf/analog) to the rf/ant/cable input of each TV. The OTA module won't decode this sort of signal (or QAM for that matter), only off-air digital.

You also need to be sure each of the TV's can tune ntsc/rf/analog. The D* setup would have involved a diplexer at each TV, so chances are they do.
The 5x8 was acting as a "hub" diplexer of sorts - diplexing the uhf/vhf signal on to each of the 8 receiver outputs.

Since diplexers were working before, they should with E*, too. Get rid of the existing multiswitch. Split the security feed with a 3-way balanced splitter (check, many aren't balanced) Each output into a diplexer along with the sat cable. Single output of diplexer to receiver, into diplexer there. One output to TV's ant/cable input, the other to a dpp separator then to the two reciever sat inputs.

If the security signal ends up being too low, a small drop-amp placed before the 3-way splitter should do the trick. Inexpensive and relatively noise-free.
You may need to attenuate the input to the amp if the security signal overloads the amp's output.

Not sure exactly what you mean by "clean insertion to complement the rest of the equipment in the mechanical room" unless you simply mean "neat and tidy".

How to you get TV2 output from each receiver to the TVs? Do you want the TV1/2 signals from each available on multiple sets? If so, it's a bit more complicated but quite doable.

Mark

Last edited by mjstraw; 12-14-2009 at 02:48 PM. Reason: spelling/typos
Reply With Quote
  #7    (permalink
Old 12-14-2009, 06:11 PM
SatelliteGuys Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 29th, 2004
Posts: 64
Depending on how many coax cables you have running to each receiver location (or can add) my first choice would be to eliminate the diplexers and use a dedicated cable from the 3-way splitter to the ant/cable in on the TV.

If you use a dedicated cable from the receiver to TV2, you should be able to split the security coax (after the diplexer if used) then a 2-way splitter/combiner to join it and the TV2 signal from the receiver.
Reply With Quote
  #8    (permalink
Old 12-15-2009, 12:41 AM
SatelliteGuys Junkie
 
Join Date: May 5th, 2007
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 4,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by SatelliteMike View Post
I'm thinking the addition of 3 OTA modules to the receivers, using the existing Direct TV multi switch as a splitter with a direct feed to the OTA units in the receivers.
I'd recommend against tinkering with the 5X8 multiswitch. The multiswitch is not a passive device. I question its ability to function without power and the wisdom of using an 8-way splitter where less is needed.
Reply With Quote
  #9    (permalink
Old 02-19-2010, 06:12 PM
SatelliteMike's Avatar
SatelliteGuys Freshman
Topic Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 1st, 2009
Location: Northern Kentucky
Posts: 7
OK, final result was using 2 each 4-in/1-out splitters, one taking the feed from all three of the diplexer TV2 outputs AND the modified output of security cameras, now using AIR channel 65, feeding the total output to an identical 4-in/1-out splitter and sending the signal to all three TV2 locations and using the last output into a 3 way splitter, fed that output directly into two TV1 tv's via RG6. Receiver feed to each of these TV1's is currently HDMI. TV2 channels were changed, we're using 60, 62, and 69 for the TV2 feeds, and air 65 for the security feed. Used auto programming, then deleted wrong channels from each TV2 location. TV1 solution was easier, ran new cabling to 2 of the three locations as a direct feed to the tv's, and customer decided he really didn't want the feed into the theater (third TV1 location) as it would give the kids early warning to dash if they were in there without permission.
Thanks for all the options, glad to get a view from outside the box.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  SatelliteGuys.US > Signals From The Sky > The Dish Network Forum > Dish Network - Technical Discussions

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

Search Google


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53 PM.


Get all the SatelliteGuys News Flashes on

SatelliteGuys.US is a PROUD SPONSOR of the Newington Little League - Newington, Connecticut
SatelliteGuys.US is not affiliated with any cable or satellite television company
The opinions expressed here at SatelliteGuys.US are those of our members and may not reflect the opinions of our staff, our sponsors, or any Satellite/Cable Company.

All trademarks are property of their respective owners.
The SatelliteGuys Logo and the "G Satellite" Icon are Trademarks of SatelliteGuys Incorporated

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.5.1
Copyright 2003 - 2010 SatelliteGuys Incorporated - All Rights Reserved
Page generated in 0.18779 seconds with 13 queries