Results 31 to 39 of 39
Thread: Who has better HD PQ? Content?
- 12-02-2009 07:30 AM #31
ADVERTS
www.sonicbabble.com The best non sat discussion on the net
- 12-02-2009 07:30 AM # ADS
Paying The Bills With Google Adsense Circuit advertisement- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
- 12-03-2009 11:21 AM #32
I have had both DirecTV & Dish Network in the past 4 months. The PQ on both look outstanding when in HD. SD is for the birds.
I left Dish Network due to their not carrying my RSN RedSox/Celtics in HD all the time.
Dish does not have the bandwidth to do what they said they could do when I signed up -so after 10 months, I left them. DirecTV has been great for me. Dish Network was good to deal with too. Both have been fair to me."Be polite to all, but intimate with few." -Thomas Jefferson
- 12-03-2009 05:22 PM #33
SatelliteGuys Junkie
- Join Date
- Oct 31st, 2005
- Location
- Mesa, AZ
- Posts
- 1,178
- 12-03-2009 10:01 PM #34
- 12-03-2009 11:12 PM #35
SatelliteGuys Junkie
- Join Date
- Oct 31st, 2005
- Location
- Mesa, AZ
- Posts
- 1,178
I can't say anything about D* as i do not have it. But, i will say E* HD is about the same as watching an SDDVD being upconverted on a PS3. It's fairly obvious the poster that states both E* and D* have great PQ doesn't have a clue on what good satellite HD is and could be. If E* and D* would just pass the channels along as the programmers intended us to view them without compressing and degrading the picture further. I would be happy. Just look at what E* and D* did to SD. They made it look like crap. If you think they haven't compromised the HD either. Your wrong.
- 12-04-2009 09:03 AM #36
What it really comes down to is if the viewer is happy with what they see. I was happy with what I saw. I don't have any other comparisons to go by regarding satellite so my view is limited to Dish/DirectTV I have to admit. Live and let live, live and learn. I learned something. Thanks.
"Be polite to all, but intimate with few." -Thomas Jefferson
- 12-04-2009 06:25 PM #37
Most of the posts I have read say that Directv's hd is a bit better than Dish, but that's not my point. You do realize that ALL hd sources compress the signal to some extent, yes? It's how well it is handled that determines the quality. I remember when I first got my cband dish. I saw a Blue Jay game in sd that was so clear it would rival today's hd in many ways. Never the less, the hd we see today is still very good. If your hd picture is comparable to up-converted sd, then you have a problem unrelated to the signal itself. Something is wrong with your setup.
Chip
- 12-04-2009 09:21 PM #38
SatelliteGuys Junkie
- Join Date
- Oct 31st, 2005
- Location
- Mesa, AZ
- Posts
- 1,178
- 12-05-2009 02:55 PM #39
Bandwidth issues are the reason they cant do what you want here. They have to compress.
However, I agree with raoul. If your HD feed from either doesnt look any better than upconverted SD on a PS3, there is a problem somewhere in your setup that is not related to what D* or E* is sending out IMHO, and going off of my experience with sat HD vs PS3 upconverted DVDs.www.sonicbabble.com The best non sat discussion on the net
-
Advertising
- SatelliteGuys.US
- has no influence
- on advertisings
- that are displayed by
- Google Adsense








LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

Reply With Quote

Forum Threads
Bookmarks