Results 1 to 10 of 11
- 04-30-2005 11:27 AM #1
So I'm reading the manual for the SG2100...
ADVERTS 1
And the manual tells you to look up the elevation / declination settings depending on your latitude. No problem so far...
It then tells you to set the elevation angle of the motor - no doubt from that table you just looked at. - No problem...
It then tells you to find you declination angle on the table and it's a small number - like 8°. It then says "Set the declination angle by the scale on the antenna dish. The reading on the dish scale should be 40° declination angle".
Why did They have me look up the declination angle if I'm just going to set it to 40°?
Maybe this will make more sense when I have this stuff in hand - lol.
- 04-30-2005 11:27 AM # ADS
Register Today & This Ad Goes Away! Circuit advertisement- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
- 04-30-2005 11:55 AM #2
On vacation
- Join Date
- Nov 5th, 2003
- Posts
- 0
You are right you will not really need the declination angle, just use the motor and dish angles from the Angle Table. Set the motor elevation and never touch it again. Then set the dish elevation, but this angle can be changed slightly (up or down) to peak your signal quality when on a satellite.
- 04-30-2005 01:43 PM #3
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- Nov 5th, 2004
- Location
- Seattle Wa.
- Posts
- 46
What my book says is "The reading on the dish scale should be 30° - (MINUS) declination angle" "Please refer to the drawing on Page 3"
Originally Posted by Shawn95GT
30° minus 8° = 22° the approximate setting on the dish scale.
Hope that clarifies it for you.
- 04-30-2005 01:56 PM #4
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- Apr 28th, 2005
- Posts
- 324
"The reading on the dish scale should be 40° declination angle."
Go back and reread it again. I believe it says "40 - declination angle". So, if your declination angle is 8, then you set the angle of the dish to about 32 or somewhere thereabout. Of course you may need to tweak this later.
EDit:
What DaveC says may be correct. I've seen conflicting information regarding the SG2100. I've seen some places that say "40 - declination" and others that say "30 - declination". I don't know whether this is an error or perhaps there were 2 different models of the same motor.
- 04-30-2005 03:30 PM #5
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- Feb 9th, 2004
- Posts
- 45
From what I've read there were maybe two different arms used on the sg2100, one arm used a 30 angle and one used a 40 angle. I have the book that came with my sg2100 and it shows a 30 degree angle to the motor arm, been several years since I set mine up now.
The pole is of course vertical, the motor mounts to that there is an angle adjustment to the motor at the bracket. Then there is an additional angle adjustment between the motor arm and the actual dish. my dish has no angle indicator I had to peak it manually and get it aligned correctly on the arc.
- 04-30-2005 04:54 PM #6
- Join Date
- Feb 9th, 2005
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ
- Posts
- 2,277 Thread Starter
Yup - you got it, it does have the "-" in there.
Originally Posted by Stefan
I think SG2100 quickly got adopted as a name for a motor by different brands. I think this is why the different 30° / 40° arms.
That P990 or whatever it is seems to be the same as a SG2100 with a smaller swing radius... like 90° vs 140°.
- 04-30-2005 06:36 PM #7
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- Apr 28th, 2005
- Posts
- 324
How are you planning to attach your primestar dish to the SG2100? I used the original mount turned upside down. I used 2 pieces of PVC pipe to go between the motor shaft and the primestar mount and adapt it to fit. I used a piece of 1.5" schedule 40 PVC pipe and a piece of 2.0" schedule 40 PVC pipe. It is necessary to cut a slit down the length of both pieces of pipe. The slit in the 1.5" pipe allows it to expand to fit tightly to the SG2100 shaft as the inside of the 1.5" pipe is slightly too smal to fit over it without the slit cut into it. The slit in the 2.0" pipe allows it to compress enough to fit into the Primestar mount. When you cut the slit in the 2" pipe you must make it wide enough to allow for the pipe to compress enough to fit. If I recall correctly I cut mine about 3/8" to 1/2" wide.
One other thing I had to do was trim some material off the mount with a dremel. If you look at the primestar mount where bolts tighten up and clamp the mount to the pole, you'll notice there is kind of a ridge or lip on one side that will butt up against the other side when the bolts are tightened to a certain point. This was probably done to limit the amount the mount could clamp down on the pole such that overtightening the bolts wouldn't result in compressing in the sides of the pole and distorting it's cross section into an oval. In order to make it work in this configuration and be able to compress the PVC pipe around the SG2100 shaft this ridge must be removed or partially removed to allow the bolts to be tightened farther and generate more clamping force. So that's what I did. The result is a pretty nice mount that's not to difficult to construct and allows for easy adjustment of declination by simply turning the adjustment bolt on the bottom (which was on top in the original configuration). Anyway, if you have the original mount, a couple of pieces of PVC pipe and a dremel handy, this might be something you want to look at trying.
- 04-30-2005 08:00 PM #8
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- Feb 9th, 2004
- Posts
- 45
I built my own lighter mount, pics and drawings here: http://www.satelliteguys.us/showthread.php?t=42450
- 04-30-2005 08:09 PM #9
- Join Date
- Feb 9th, 2005
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ
- Posts
- 2,277 Thread Starter
I might give either of those a shot.
I had originally saw your instructions Ziploc but then I thought it might be cool to have skew adjustment... so I pretty much bolted the P* dish to a Dish500. It is yet to be seen if this ghetto attachment will work out but if I cna make the original P* mount work it'd most definately be stronger.
I've got a good week before I even get my reciever so I'll take the P* mount apart and look it over. I thought the whole problem with the P* mount was the sheer weight of it. The original elevation adjustment is kind of cool and I wouldn't mind retaining it.
- 04-30-2005 09:52 PM #10
SatelliteGuys Regular
- Join Date
- Feb 9th, 2004
- Posts
- 45
I have/can do elevation adjustment of the dish in relation to the arm by adjusting a couple of nuts on the lower threaded rods which were really way too long in that photo so I cut them way shorter. downside is that there is just no angle indicator, the lower mount is setup so I can adjust the dish. It actually worked very well to help me fine tune the declination angle as I could run out a few turns on the nuts check how it tracked the arc using a signal meter, and go back/forth until thee signal was strongest along all points of the arc. once I tuned it on a pole in my driveway it was simple to recreate the proper mounting on a short eve mounted pole at the roofline. after fine tuning it a couple more nuts keep it locked in place, once in a while a good wind messes me up by a degree or two but it's simple to get back on track, it's usually the whole pole that has turned in my eve mount.
The regular mount is 9lbs and the homebuilt is about 2lbs. The Dish's skew adjustment is handled by the arm of the motor itself. Once you have the motor mounted and have the dish attached and peak it on a few satellites so it tracks the arc properly the dish automatically skews what looks to be 75-80 degrees at either end of the arc it travels.
Originally I built a test rig(a length of the pole/pipe using a threaded floor mount to a simple wooden X) that I could level/set on my driveway and tweak adjustments until I understood how it all went/worked together. This was a very fun garage project for me.

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks