Those listed below are our PROUD SatelliteGuys GOLD Sponsors!
Applied Instruments DishStore.NET Home Theater Cruise glorystar.tv satelliteavgs tele-satellite.com

Welcome HOME to SatelliteGuys!


  •  » Looking for help picking a television provider?
  •  » Need Help with your Satellite System?
  •  » Need Advice on your Home Theater Setup?
  •  » Looking for the latest industry news and rumors?

...then you have come to the right place!

DIRECTV, DISH Network, FTA Satellite, Cable TV, HDTV even 3DTV!

We Can Help! We are known as America's Satellite Information Source!
YES! I want to register an account for FREE right now!

YOU ARE AT THE PLACE WHERE INDUSTRY EXPERTS HANG OUT!

p.s.: Registered members see a lot less ads! REGISTER TODAY!

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    mikekohl is offline Supporting Founder
    Supporting Founder

    Help Keep SatelliteGuys For All, Click a Star and Become a Supporter! This Member did! Help Support The Site And Get Rid of the Syndicated Ads, This Member did! If you enjoy the site consider supporting it, this member did! Click a Star and become a Supporting Pub Member today!
    Join Date
    Jun 4th, 2004
    Location
    Plain, Wisconsin
    Posts
    557

    Independent Performance Testing of several 75-90 cm Offset antennas

    ADVERTS 1
    Now on my website at

    www.global-cm.net/antennatests052406.html




    Independent carrier-to-nose results from testing on the following antennas:

    Paraclipse 90 cm Millennium round offset antenna
    Primestar by Channel Master 84-E Elliptical offset antenna
    Primestar by Channel Master 75-E Elliptical offset antenna
    Patriot 85-E Elliptical offset antenna
    Fortec Star 80 cm round offset antenna
    DMS International Hot Dish 75 round offset antenna
    Winegard 2076 round offset antenna

    Signal was measured within 0.1 dB on all available transponders of Anik F1R, using a Motorola DSR-315 receiver. Other details can be found on the link.
    I'll call this "DBs versus Dollars"

    This is a set of measurements that I have done, with no loyalties to any
    particular company, on antennas that are either commonly available and
    still in production, or available even though no longer made from sources such as myself and others. I would welcome comparisons from others on a similar or
    expanded scale, but thought this testing should be limited to the most commonly used sizes between 75 and 90 cm antennas.

    Mike Kohl / Global Communications
    Plain, Wisconsin
    EMail globalcm@mhtc.net

    See one of the oldest continually updated MPEG-2 info sites at www.global-cm.net/MPEGlistKuBandUS.html

  2. # ADS
    Register Today & This Ad Goes Away! Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many
     
  3. #2
    PSB
    PSB is offline On vacation
    Join Date
    Nov 5th, 2003
    Posts
    0
    THANKS Mike this will be a wonderful resource for members!

  4. #3
    drhydro's Avatar
    drhydro is offline SatelliteGuys Junkie
    Join Date
    Oct 19th, 2004
    Posts
    1,572
    Excellant test Mike. Very professionally done, and the results will be helpful to many of our members. Thanks for sharing with us.

  5. #4
    Stats8 is offline SatelliteGuys Regular
    Join Date
    May 3rd, 2005
    Posts
    128
    Thanks for all the testing, that is a very usefull chart, but actually your conclusion is the 90 cm is best overall, however the 85 cm primestar has the better numbers?
    Or did I read it wrong?

  6. #5
    mikekohl is offline Supporting Founder
    Supporting Founder

    Help Keep SatelliteGuys For All, Click a Star and Become a Supporter! This Member did! Help Support The Site And Get Rid of the Syndicated Ads, This Member did! If you enjoy the site consider supporting it, this member did! Click a Star and become a Supporting Pub Member today!
    Join Date
    Jun 4th, 2004
    Location
    Plain, Wisconsin
    Posts
    557
    Thread Starter
    If you look at all transponders tested, and compare the best readings on the 90 cm Paraclipse with the 84-E, there were several instances in which the 90 cm
    excelled in the numbers game (carrier-to-noise in dB). I also noted that the NJRC LNBFs used by the Primestar/Channel Master antennas were considerably more linear in their response across the band. If the same LNBF could be used on
    both antennas, you would very likely see a slight edge on the Paraclipse 90.
    Conventional LNBFs can be used on the Primestar, but it usually involved making a "clamp" with a hose clamp sheet metal screwed into each side, and tightening the clamp.

    All of that said, the Primestar 84-E is a knockout in performance and efficiency,
    and when you can get one, grab it. We have both in stock here at Global, but
    the numbers are limited. The 84-E can be shipped at the UPS Oversize 2 rate
    (70 pounds plus additional handling charge), and any 90 cm antenna usually
    gets tagged as Oversize 3 (90 pound tariff). In most situations this adds
    anywhere from 45 to 60 dollars to the freight bill. Should someone want the
    90 cm Paraclipse, we often suggest buying two, and shipping them via BAX GLOBAL air freight, where two antennas can usually ship at the same price
    as one, because you are still at the minimum tariff....which in many cases is
    equal or less than UPS Ground, and much faster.
    Mike Kohl / Global Communications
    Plain, Wisconsin
    EMail globalcm@mhtc.net

    See one of the oldest continually updated MPEG-2 info sites at www.global-cm.net/MPEGlistKuBandUS.html

  7. #6
    Stats8 is offline SatelliteGuys Regular
    Join Date
    May 3rd, 2005
    Posts
    128
    Great info, thanks Mike!

  8. #7
    Sadoun's Avatar
    Sadoun is offline SatelliteGuys Junkie
    Join Date
    Feb 27th, 2005
    Location
    Columbus, OHIO
    Posts
    2,315
    Nice test Mike.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

SatelliteGuys.US | 46 Miami Avenue | Newington, Connecticut 06111
Links monetized by VigLink