Follow Us On TWITTER | NEW LOOK | PDA MODE
Those listed below are our PROUD SatelliteGuys GOLD Sponsors!
Applied Instruments DishStore.NET

» Advertising
Register Today and many of these ads go away!


Welcome to SatelliteGuys.US - America's Most Popular Satellite Information Forum!!

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest which gives you limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post & reply messages in our forum, play in our fun arcade and communicate privately with other members as well as enjoy many other members only features.

Also as a registered member you will also see much less advertising!

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER!

Go Back   SatelliteGuys.US > Signals From The Sky > Free To Air (FTA) Discussion > FTA/MPEG2 Equipment Reviews
Sponsored Links

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #71 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2006, 10:37 AM
PSB PSB is offline
On vacation
Topic Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 5th, 2003
Location: St. Paul / Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Posts: 8,868
Send a message via AIM to PSB
Sponsored Links
The scalar ring is defiantly needed! It helps collect the signal and direct it into the LNB, and it also helps block signals from adjacent satellites!

I would contact your dealer and let them know you did not receive a scalar ring with your BSC621-2, it should also come with a dielectric plate for circular signals!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #72 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2006, 02:40 PM
Seafoam's Avatar
SatelliteGuys Freshman
 
Join Date: Aug 19th, 2006
Location: Caribbean
Posts: 19
Thank you PSB,
I was working on it today then it got to Hot to continue,, Actually it was sent with the lnbf but my friend forgot to take it with him along with a meter as well that I purchased he came to visit it was easier to send him the stuff then mail it all to me.. well now it is worse.... I Understand what you are saying about the ring and its importance I still do not see how the Scalar ring will attach to these arms. I'll try to attach a photo of the current hook up with the circular lnb from D*sh..
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Lnb Dish 1.JPG
Views:	208
Size:	39.1 KB
ID:	11029  
Reply With Quote
  #73 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2006, 02:49 PM
PSB PSB is offline
On vacation
Topic Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 5th, 2003
Location: St. Paul / Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Posts: 8,868
Send a message via AIM to PSB
I see what you mean now! Some 'modifiaction' will be needed!
Reply With Quote
  #74 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2006, 01:58 PM
SatelliteGuys Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2nd, 2006
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by PSB
Just back from a week working on motorized satellite systems in L.A. California
First thing I see on my return is a new C/KU LNB for testing

Still working on it so once again this is a review/test in progress.

I have been using the Splendid ASC-421 C-Band LNB up until now and the first thing I did was swap it with the new CKU LNBF.

I was on a HD movie channel, the signal Quality was at 67% as soon as I swapped the LNB the quality jumped to around 70%

Still working on the KU side and will add my findings here........

The C-Band side is standard with the L.O. being 05150

The KU side of the LNB is a Universal with the L.O. being 09750-10600

The REALLY neat thing about this fantastic LNB is that it has its own internal 2x1 DiSEqC switch, so one cable from the receiver does it all!

MUCH more to come!



"High stability DRO, and using the new BSC technology"

Comes with a dielectric plate for the few circular polarized C-Band satellites.

Nasty Negitave remarks will always be removed from a review!
Can you say if the bsc621-2 c/ku lnbf will work with 4DTV.
Reply With Quote
  #75 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2006, 07:20 PM
PSB PSB is offline
On vacation
Topic Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 5th, 2003
Location: St. Paul / Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Posts: 8,868
Send a message via AIM to PSB
Will not work as the Ku side is a Universal LNBF!
Reply With Quote
  #76 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2006, 05:57 PM
SatelliteGuys Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 21st, 2005
Posts: 153
Pete, I see you still have the cone shaped scaler I'd built for you some time back. Im very happy to see you put it to good use. I've been on a container ship at sea for 6 months and am trying to catch up on things, Keep up the good work ! I would like to ask how you find the reception of the Ku with the Ku / C combo as opossed to say the Ivacom .03 on the same dish. I think there has been some findings that combining both feeds will dimminish the Ku feed with the combo unit. I had limited success adding the Invacom to the back of my ASC421. Great work Pete, Alec
Reply With Quote
  #77 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2006, 06:44 PM
PSB PSB is offline
On vacation
Topic Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 5th, 2003
Location: St. Paul / Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Posts: 8,868
Send a message via AIM to PSB
NICE to see you back Alec

I JUST posted this in another thread about this LNBF!


"You have to setup the Ku Band side FIRST, the focal distance, skew and azimuth are slightly different from Ku to C-Band.

Optimise the Ku signals, you may notice a slight decrease in C-Band signal quality but there is no rain fade with C-Band.

I also found that the C-Band and Ku Band signals are NOT at exactly the same place in the sky (Even on the same satellite), so you will have to move you dish in azimuth slightly for best results!"


I have never tried the Invacom on my 6' mesh dish (Just cut away the scalar ring to add Ku LNB's) so I have no real way to compare, but this LNBF is a compromise for people who want to experiment with C-Band signals.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Pict0105.JPG
Views:	165
Size:	33.3 KB
ID:	12167   Click image for larger version

Name:	Pict0106.JPG
Views:	130
Size:	40.9 KB
ID:	12168  
Reply With Quote
  #78 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2006, 07:01 PM
SatelliteGuys Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 21st, 2005
Posts: 153
I am presently using my Ku incorporated into the C band scaler and have tried to optimize the ku signal. It works fairly well, but the Ku is not as good as mounting the Ku by itself. Is there a noise rating for the Ku side of this combo your testing ?
Reply With Quote
  #79 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2006, 07:29 PM
PSB PSB is offline
On vacation
Topic Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 5th, 2003
Location: St. Paul / Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Posts: 8,868
Send a message via AIM to PSB
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alec
I am presently using my Ku incorporated into the C band scaler and have tried to optimize the ku signal. It works fairly well, but the Ku is not as good as mounting the Ku by itself. Is there a noise rating for the Ku side of this combo your testing ?
I remember the work you were doing


BSC321-2 C/KU LNBFSpecs

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BSC321-2 C/Ku LNBF
C Band
Input 3.4~4.2 GHz
Output 950~1750 MHz
LO 5150 MHz
Gain 65 dB
13k

Ku Band
Input 10.7~12.75 GHz
Output 950~1950 MHz Low band
1100~2150 MHz High band
LO 9.75 GHz Low band
10.6 GHz High band
Noise 0.3 dB
Reply With Quote
  #80 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2006, 07:48 PM
SatelliteGuys Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 21st, 2005
Posts: 153
Super Pete, very good !!
Reply With Quote
Reply

  SatelliteGuys.US > Signals From The Sky > Free To Air (FTA) Discussion > FTA/MPEG2 Equipment Reviews

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

Search Google


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:24 PM.


Get SatelliteGuys News Flashes on

SatelliteGuys.US is Proud to be relaxed home of the DirecTV Cutting Edge (CE) Program.
SatelliteGuys.US is also a PROUD SPONSOR of the Newington Little League - Newington, Connecticut
SatelliteGuys.US is not affiliated with any cable or satellite television company
The opinions expressed here at SatelliteGuys.US are those of our members and may not reflect the opinions of our staff, our sponsors, or any Satellite/Cable Company.

All trademarks are property of their respective owners.
The SatelliteGuys Logo and the "G Satellite" Icon are Trademarks of SatelliteGuys Incorporated

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.0 RC2
Copyright 2003 - 2010 SatelliteGuys Incorporated - All Rights Reserved
Page generated in 0.16566 seconds with 14 queries