Those listed below are our PROUD SatelliteGuys GOLD Sponsors!
Applied Instruments DishStore.NET Home Theater Cruise glorystar.tv satelliteavgs tele-satellite.com

Welcome HOME to SatelliteGuys!


  •  » Looking for help picking a television provider?
  •  » Need Help with your Satellite System?
  •  » Need Advice on your Home Theater Setup?
  •  » Looking for the latest industry news and rumors?

...then you have come to the right place!

DIRECTV, DISH Network, FTA Satellite, Cable TV, HDTV even 3DTV!

We Can Help! We are known as America's Satellite Information Source!
YES! I want to register an account for FREE right now!

YOU ARE AT THE PLACE WHERE INDUSTRY EXPERTS HANG OUT!

p.s.: Registered members see a lot less ads! REGISTER TODAY!

Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 7 8 9
Results 81 to 88 of 88
  1. #81
    ftarock is offline SatelliteGuys Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 22nd, 2005
    Posts
    181
    ADVERTS 1
    If someone comes out with a DVB 4:2:0 and 4:2:2, 4:2:2 is a plus for SD 4:2:2 only.
    FYI, ESPN, ABC...start using DolbyE for their HD feeds. I'll tell you 90% of the HD 4:2:2 feed in this season are DolbyE, that's none of the consumer receivers on the market able to decode. Some HD 4:2:0 feeds use DolbyE too.
    I don't hold my breath for consumer 4:2:2 receivers. To tell the truth, most manufacture target at hacking community those don't need 4:2:2 at all.




    Quote Originally Posted by anik View Post
    Well if the spring training feeds are any indication, this receiver may not be as useful as you would think. All the 4.2.0 stuff so far seems to be standard definition (I can receive it on my Pansat 2500A) and the rest is 4:2:2. Since this receiver won't do 4:2:2, I don't think it will help.

    The thing I would most like about this receiver, I think, is that it decodes AC3 audio without need of an external decoder. That's a big plus in my book. Being able to pick up OTA signals is another big plus. The thing I would most dislike about it is the inability to get 4:2:2, which has been around for how long now? I can't believe that anyone would design a HD receiver and not include the ability to decode 4:2:2. And also the inability to do a blind scan would be problematic (I really don't want to have to switch receivers in and out just to be able to scan for signals).

    If any other manufacturers are looking at the comments on this review, I hope they will see that there really is a desire to receive 4:2:2, and also to have a built in AC3 decoder and a good OTA tuner. I'm sure that now that one company has come out with a unit of this type others will feel the need to follow, but I'd rather they take an extra month or two and get it right than rush a product to market. Until a receiver comes along that will receive 4:2:2, I'm keeping my money in my wallet, unless the amount of HD programming available in 4:2:0 takes a big jump (but even then I'd prefer to not be limited to just 4:2:0 HD).

    What might really cause me to seriously consider making the jump is a receiver that could handle 4:2:0 and 4:2:2, OTA signals, had built in AC3 decoding and smart scan, AND had a built-in PVR (and it all worked without looking like it was patched together with bailing wire and duct tape, and wasn't priced like a small car). I suppose that's too much to hope for, though.

    I wonder if anything else will appear that will cause me to reconsider my decision to make do with my Pansat 2500A a while longer.

  2. # ADS
    Register Today & This Ad Goes Away! Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many
     
  3. #82
    johnnytuinals's Avatar
    johnnytuinals is offline SatelliteGuys Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 14th, 2005
    Location
    Poconos
    Posts
    193
    Was thinking of getting a 8000HD just because my rear projection does NOT have a OTA decoder...
    Well my Rear projection is on its last leg and I do hope to see the 50 and 58 inch Plasmas with BUILTIN ota decoders for $$2000 and under in the next few month,,,I can get a panasonic HD plasma 50 inch at $1600,so I feel they should drop a bit more and hope to get the NEXT HD DVB generation soon.....Jt

  4. #83
    Remington's Avatar
    Remington is offline SatelliteGuys Regular
    Join Date
    Aug 1st, 2005
    Location
    Gatineau, Qc.
    Posts
    163
    Quote Originally Posted by voomvoom View Post
    Thanks for the Review Tony. Very Good Review! No blind scan puts it in the same category as the Qualitv. ATSC tuner puts it a step ahead of the Qualitv. Not being able to do 4:2:2 puts it a step back with the Qualitv. All in All, I know I want one, and will probably get one at some point in the future. Now I guess I'm waiting to see what the Pansat HD is going to do? Of course that may take a few years, but I'm hoping it and others will show up at the Sat Expo in Atlanta.Thanks!

    Al
    I read this on an American dealer web site: (About QualiTV)
    Most of the High Definition feeds on satellite are in 4:2:0 HD and the receiver plays these feeds excellently. There are some 4:2:2 HD feeds and the receiver puts a greenish flashing horizontal line across the bottom of the screen, about 1 inch tall. On some HD TV sets, they have a Zoom feature and you can zoom in enough so you do not see the line. Quali-TV is aware of this issue and has the data stream, but as of yet, they have not released a software version that will fix it.

    It seems hard to have it all isn't?

    HD, 4:2:2, USALS, Blind scan... PVR... why not!

  5. #84
    SatinKzo's Avatar
    SatinKzo is offline Supporting Founder
    Supporting Founder

    Help Keep SatelliteGuys For All, Click a Star and Become a Supporter! This Member did! Help Support The Site And Get Rid of the Syndicated Ads, This Member did! If you enjoy the site consider supporting it, this member did! Click a Star and become a Supporting Pub Member today!
    Join Date
    May 22nd, 2004
    Location
    ArkLaMiss
    Posts
    5,861
    Well, other than the PVR part, hopefully very soon with the fortec passion receiver we'll have 4 out of 5
    LG550, Pio51FD/Pio VSX-03TXH/Pansat 9200/AzBox/7MC>360 extender| 1.2m motorized/90cm on 101 & 105/80cm on 74 & 79/Homemade Gray-Hoverman: OTA/FTA/Netflix/Vudu for my viewing entertainment
    The angels have the phone box.

  6. #85
    Remington's Avatar
    Remington is offline SatelliteGuys Regular
    Join Date
    Aug 1st, 2005
    Location
    Gatineau, Qc.
    Posts
    163
    Are you sure it will blind scan? I did not see it in the Features.

  7. #86
    Remington's Avatar
    Remington is offline SatelliteGuys Regular
    Join Date
    Aug 1st, 2005
    Location
    Gatineau, Qc.
    Posts
    163
    I guess I read the European specs... (?)

    Everybody seem to agree it will have blind scan.

    Good. I want one!

  8. #87
    Bulbman2's Avatar
    Bulbman2 is offline SatelliteGuys Regular
    Join Date
    Oct 18th, 2005
    Posts
    74

    hd

    are there more fta hd programing than 6 months ago

    last time I checked there were very few hd programs?

  9. #88
    Iceberg's Avatar
    Iceberg is offline The No Pain Train
    Proud SatelliteGuys Staff Member

    Proud Staff Member
    Join Date
    Nov 17th, 2003
    Location
    Now Living In the Last House on the Left
    Posts
    75,800
    Thread Starter
    most recent factory software with clean file and loader
    Attached Files
    Last edited by Iceberg; 04-09-2008 at 08:00 PM.
    Winegard 76cm dish, SG2100 motor, Sadoun dual KU LNB..... Directv Slimline SWM 3 LNB.... GeoSatPro 36" dish with Sadoun dual KU LNB... Coolsat 5000 on motorized.... Manhattan RS1933....Directv HR34 (yes the 5 tuner monster) GeoSatPro 200 to aim dishes.... few receivers not set up yet
    Two 6 foot Fortec dish with GeoSatPro dual C-Band LNB "ghetto moved" to various C-Band satellites

Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 7 8 9

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

SatelliteGuys.US | 46 Miami Avenue | Newington, Connecticut 06111
Links monetized by VigLink