The Review
U-Verse promises so much but does it deliver? The answer really depends on what technology your coming from.
The picture quality on most standard definition channels rival those of any satellite or cable company I have seen, in fact in many cases the picture looked almost as good as it would if you were watching it off an analog C Band feed.
That is good, from that aspect it beats satellite and most cable companies, however most people want U-Verse for its incredible High Definition lineup, which here in Connecticut is over 25 channels.
Unfortunately my view of the U-VERSE HD picture quality is not quite as good as I hoped it would be. In fact after doing some tests this weekend I have come to the conclusion that the high definition picture quality is a bit worse then it is on Dish Network.
In my tests I recorded a show from Discovery HD on both my U-VERSE DVR and my Dish Network 622. In playback I first started watching Dish Network then flipped to the same show on U Verse, the U-verse backrounds show heavy boxes floating around the screen. I repeated this with a program from HBO and another from Food HD, the same backround blocking was seen in the U-Verse picture.
In doing some checking on this I found out that U-Verse was sending the HD in about 10Mbs MPEG4 streams, the same stream on Dish (Food HD) was using 12 - 14 Mbs. The extra 2 MB of data was enough to make a big difference in the picture quality.
However with that said I will admit that while the HD did not look great on my 50 Inch Sony SXRD set, it was find on my 32 inch LG set in the bedroom.
However this brings up another major flaw in the U-VERSE, at the moment you can have up to 4 receivers in your house, all of their receivers are HD. The flaw is at this time you can only watch 1 HD channel on any given receiver in your house at a time. This means only 1 receiver can watch a HD channel, if a second person in the house wants to watch something in HD they will see an error message that all HD streams are in use to turn to a non HD channel or it gives you the option to boot the other receiver out of the HD stream it's tuned to.
For me this is a major problem especially considering I have 5 HDTV's in my house. The word going around is that they hope to have 2 streams available per house sometime soon, but even that is not enough.
On the plus side for the most part I do like the receivers when they are working.
What does this mean "when they are working?" For whatever reason the units like to freeze up a lot, the one in the living room sometimes need to be reset 3 times a night, while the DVR has been better behaved only needing to be rebooted once. The problem with these receivers is that a reboot can take close to 3 minutes, kind of annoying when your 4 year old wants his barny back on NOW.
I love being able to hit the up and down arrow on my remote and actually see whats on the other channels without changing the channel I am on. I addition I love being able to record 4 SD channels at one time. This blows and cable or satellite DVR away.
They advertise how fast the channel changing on U-Verse, but I got to honestly say the speeds in changing channels is about the same as changing channels on my 622, maybe its faster then Digital Cable, but since I don't have digital cable I can't tell you if this is true or not.
The audio quality on the SD channels is the BEST audio I have ever heard from cable or satellite, with very deep separation, the IPTV handles the sound very well, much better then any MTS Stereo decoder I have ever listened to.
The software itself on the box is nice and easy to learn and navigate, I expect most folks to like it when its made available to the XBOX360.
The remotes are nice although I would like to see a combo UHF/IR remote.
The programming is great with almost any channel you could want, there are quite a few channels such as Sprout and AZN which are great channels and I don't believe they are on either satellite company nor on my local cable service.
The video on demand however is HIGHLY disappointing, with really nothing good to watch. I understand that this service just started but it should have more selections available then what is up there now.
In addition there is no Pay Per View on U-Verse, while yes you can PPV movies from Video On Demand there are no live PPV events, this means no wrestling, no UFC, no boxing etc.
In addition their VOD service does not offer two of the most popular video on demand services, WWE 24/7 and Howard TV.
Also for some reason their Video on Demand programming (at least in the free categories) is HIGHLY compressed, the picture quality looks even worse then the worst satellite or digital cable signals I have ever seen. Because the standard definition channels look so good on U-Verse it makes their VOD stand out as how bad they look.
The customer service is a mixed back, first off despite the glitches they had the installers were amazing, and they went out of their way to make sure I was happy. I wish I could say the same thing about telephone support, where I have had some good and some bad experiences.
Case in point one of the advertised features of U-Verse is to be able to program your DVR from any internet connection, this feature was not working for me so I submitted a ticket via the U-Verse website, a day later I get a call from a gentleman that the program via the internet feature only works within your house. (huh? If I could only program it from my house it would be easier to do it from my remote) after telling him he was wrong I finally got to his supervisor who told me that this feature was not available to me because I do not subscribe to the internet service. (Funny nothing on their website says this) I am still not happy about this.
My overall thought on AT&T U-Verse are this, it could be a great service, however at the moment with poor VOD service, highly compress HD service, flakey boxes I would say that the U-Verse is still a beta product and is not ready for prime time. There are times when services or channels are not available, and that it unacceptable to me. This is still a beta service and for some reason they decided to roll out out unfinished. They should not be charging for the service as it is now.
I do believe that it can and will get better, however I still believe that this U-Verse is just a band aid for what AT&T really needs to do and that would be Fiber to the home.
Fiber to the home would fix the high definition PQ issues and would allow every HD TV in your house to watch different HD shows at the same time. Plus it would allow for faster internet speeds instead of the chintzy speeds offered now via U-Verse.
Would I recommend U-Verse to folks? It depends as to what they watch on TV. If you a person who enjoys a pristine high definition picture, I would tell them to look elsewhere, however if your someone who mainly watch standard definition channels I would recommend it as long as you could deal with the bugs and glitches that need to be fixed.
I don't give AT&T U-Verse a thumbs down or a thumbs up, more a thumbs in the middle, it has its plusses and minuses. It has its flaws and is not perfect, but for some of us techy folks it might be fun to watch it grow.
U-Verse could be trouble for the Satellite industry especially with its high quality standard definition quality, however at this time the cable industry has nothing to fear, because if they are setup correctly they could offer everything U-Verse offers and more with the bandwidth limitations for things such as the number of people in your house watching HD channels.
If you have any questions please post them here and I will try my best to answer your questions.
Thats my review folks, thanks for reading. And thanks for spending some time with us today at SatelliteGuys.US. We hope you will stop by and see us again soon!