Results 1 to 10 of 20
- 06-22-2010 11:23 AM #1
revisit the 60 Hz vs. 120 Hz debate, or not
ADVERTS 1
Guys, this may be yet another dumb question from me, but I haven't had the time to plow through all the info on the web regarding this issue, so I was hoping someone here could get me back up to speed. I was a fairly early adopter of HDTV - getting my first HDTV in 2000. Back then I kept up with all the technology, but as things went on I fell out of the habit of doing that. Well, the other day my old Hitachi rear projection HDTV finally let go and we had to retire it. I was not prepared to replace a TV at the moment, not having had time to do research, pricing, etc..., so i ended up at Wal-Mart. I knew I wanted an LED LCD, I didn't care about 3D TV (waiting for the technology to stabilize), and I wanted a screen size of 50 inches (my Hitachi had been a 43 inch set). I was spending time looking for high contrast ratios and 120 Hz or more. I finally settled on a Samsung UN46C5000 LED LCD, a 46 inch TV - because there is no such thing as a 50 inch LCD and 55 inchers are just too big for the space I have. I got it home, got it set up, and then found out it was a 60 Hz tv. I was pissed. I could swear the description sign on the display TV at the store said 120 Hz. At first I wanted to take the TV back, but I've been watching it and the picture is very nice - HD movies look fantastic. So, if the 60Hz vs. 120 Hz thing isn't an issue then I'm keeping it. But, if my memory serves me right, the 120 Hz refresh rate is a requirement for true 1080p display. - In other words a 1080p 60Hz HDTV won't really show me true 1080p on my PS3. Is that true?
Thanks for any answers someone might be able to give.Stacy M. Akin

Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest.
Mark Twain
- 06-22-2010 11:23 AM # ADS
Register Today & This Ad Goes Away! Circuit advertisement- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
- 06-22-2010 11:44 AM #2
1080p actually maxes at 60HZ. 120 is done by internal set processing.
120 is used since film is at 24 can generate 5 frames instead of 2.5 at 60, it smooths out the 3:2 pulldown. 60 can be doubled, and 30 4x.
- 06-22-2010 12:12 PM #3
- Join Date
- Sep 15th, 2003
- Location
- northeast Texas
- Posts
- 1,250 Thread Starter
So, bottom line is that my PS3 will play a BD and I will get all the picture quality I'm supposed to get, even though the TV is 60Hz? I understand about the 120 Hz and 24fps issue. I guess I will wait for my HDMI cables to get here so I can experiment with the PS3. (I ordered HDMI cables from Amazon.com because I refuse to pay the ungodly overpriced prices for cables of same quality that WM and RatShack charge around here.) I guess my technical question is - using Dish Network on a 722, HDMI cable out to the TV, the TV says [1920x1080i at 60 Hz] on the information button. I'm wondering if when I try a BD from the PS3 that the TV will detect it and then display [1920x1080p at 120 Hz] doubling up the refresh rate to meet the 24fps "even-ness" thing.
Stacy M. Akin

Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest.
Mark Twain
- 06-22-2010 12:53 PM #4
SatelliteGuys Junkie
- Join Date
- Apr 16th, 2007
- Posts
- 4,312
As a general rule, movies are made at 24fps (23.976 to be exact) and video - 60fps.
To do it justice when watching it, the device should be capable of 24Hz or a multiple of it (48/72/96/120...).
To be able to play both, film and video, at its native rate (24 and 60), the TV should be 120Hz or a multiple of it.
If your TV can't do 120Hz, slow horizontal pans (in movies) are not as smooth as they should be (i.e. Titanic going from the dock down into the water).
Diogen.
- 06-22-2010 10:47 PM #5
BD will register as 1080p/24 when you hit the display button on the set. It shows the source material's rate not the refresh of the set.
S~
- 06-23-2010 07:37 AM #6
People tend to get excited easily over the small stuff. I believe that most will agree that the difference is noticable if you are looking for it, but not really a big deal. You have been watching 3:2 pulldown all your life and probably never noticed the issue.
It is kind of like: Take this particular disc and go to this point. Now watch this spot. Now watch it on the other set. See the difference?
Bottom line: If the set looks good to you, sit back and enjoy it. If you spend your time worrying about something better out there, you will be replacing equipment every month. If it is noticable in regular viewing, then by all means go ahead and spend the extra money and get the set that works for you.
- 06-23-2010 09:19 AM #7
SatelliteGuys Junkie
- Join Date
- Apr 16th, 2007
- Posts
- 4,312
- 06-27-2010 12:16 PM #8
As someone who recently went from a juddering plasma to a nice 240HZ set. I'll take smoooooth any day.
TC-P65GT30/DMP-BDT500
Marantz SR6005/Klipsch RF82 II's/RC62 II/VTF2 MK4
Directv Premier/HR34/AM21N/2TB EHD
- 06-28-2010 09:08 AM #9
- Join Date
- Sep 15th, 2003
- Location
- northeast Texas
- Posts
- 1,250 Thread Starter
Well, I've been watching for judder and haven't found any yet. Hopefully I won't notice it, because so far this TV's PQ is great. I love the set and don't think 60 Hz is going to be a problem. BD's look awesome, PS3 games are too. HD PQ on the 722 is pretty good (I think Dish is still compressing too much) and we are enjoying it.
Stacy M. Akin

Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest.
Mark Twain
- 06-28-2010 09:10 AM #10
Glad to hear it. It was tough for me to move from Plasma to LCD, and I was hesitant, but overall, Im happy with this set. First one in a while that Ive not felt some reason to need to upgrade.
3D sure is not a reason for me to upgrade...TC-P65GT30/DMP-BDT500
Marantz SR6005/Klipsch RF82 II's/RC62 II/VTF2 MK4
Directv Premier/HR34/AM21N/2TB EHD

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks