am I the only one that hates the new Lyngsat Beam Maps?

[John Popper]

I can't even make out the numbers



In my experience the former maps were accurate and you could at least see the letters and numbers

Warning: This is an Old Thread This discussion is older than 90 days. information contained in it may no longer be current

[USDownlink]

Actually, I'm noticing he no longer hosts the maps himself. A sampling of a few birds sent me to the owners website, one SES, one Intelsat. I'd guess he is trying to save bandwidth costs, to the users detriment, of course.

What bird were you looking at there?

[qwert1515]

These beam maps are the ones published by the satellite owners.

Ex:
Intelsat Global Telecommunications Satellite Network

Get rid of this ad below, as well as the link redirect by becoming a Supporting Pub Member

[John Popper]

That's 89 Ku Band, I barely get beam here in Central Mex. I'm not that lucky on 87, 91 where all those sweet sports feeds are , 99, 103 and 125

[John Popper]

Get Rid of this Ad! Register Today!

These beam maps are the ones published by the satellite owners.

Ex:
Intelsat Global Telecommunications Satellite Network

Get rid of this ad below, as well as the link redirect by becoming a Supporting Pub Member

the ones they had before were better for the eyes IMO

[AcWxRadar]

---

ADVERTISING BOX

---

John,

Try Satbeams.com instead, I think you will appreciate it once you become accustomed to the format and navigation. Their maps are "interactive" and you can zoom in/zoom out and paneast/west/north and south. You can even dial them in down to the city level and beyond. Very nice!

It is all that I use now.

RADAR