Quantcast
Conn Question
Those listed below are our PROUD SatelliteGuys GOLD Sponsors!
Applied Instruments glorystar.tv satelliteavgs tele-satellite.com

Welcome HOME to SatelliteGuys! We are America's Most Popular Satellite Forum!

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 6 of 15

Thread: Conn Question

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 23rd, 2011
    Posts
    535
    Post Thanks / Like

    Conn Question

    Any idea if an isolator will prevent the isolated receivers from sharing connectivity with the other half of a duo which has IP by HIC or directly to the Hopper on the other side.

    Sent from my fingers.


  2. #2
    Help Keep SatelliteGuys For All, Click a Star and Become a Supporter! TheKrell did! Help Support The Site And Get Rid of the Syndicated Ads, TheKrell did! If you enjoy the site consider supporting it, TheKrell did! Be COOL like TheKrell and Click a Star and become a Supporting Pub Member today!
    Join Date
    Jan 4th, 2007
    Location
    Fairfax, VA
    Posts
    7,195
    Post Thanks / Like
    I claim those MoCA isolators don't pass anything other than the antenna signals: not Internet nor Hopper nor Joey video connections.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 23rd, 2011
    Posts
    535
    Post Thanks / Like
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by TheKrell
    I claim those MoCA isolators don't pass anything other than the antenna signals: not Internet nor Hopper nor Joey video connections.
    My FSM absolutely argues the contrary on it passing connectivity... I just feel if the IP conn is in MoCA then it will just block all cross node hopper to hopper chatter including conn. He thinks it discriminates. But it's too damn small to do all that....

    Sent from my fingers.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 25th, 2010
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    909
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by UTMTech View Post
    My FSM absolutely argues the contrary on it passing connectivity... I just feel if the IP conn is in MoCA then it will just block all cross node hopper to hopper chatter including conn. He thinks it discriminates. But it's too damn small to do all that....
    I'm with TheKrell. I'd put money (but not a lot until we see it in the wild) the isolator is just blocking the sub-950 frequencies from making it back to the node.

    Unless Dish is restricing whatever they are bridging from ethernet to certain Moca "channels" there isn't any way to discriminate unless you had a processor to parse the traffic.

  5. #5
    Help Keep SatelliteGuys For All, Click a Star and Become a Supporter! gpflepsen did! Help Support The Site And Get Rid of the Syndicated Ads, gpflepsen did! If you enjoy the site consider supporting it, gpflepsen did! Be COOL like gpflepsen and Click a Star and become a Supporting Pub Member today!
    Join Date
    Sep 8th, 2003
    Location
    NE
    Posts
    2,499
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by JM42 View Post
    I'm with TheKrell. I'd put money (but not a lot until we see it in the wild) the isolator is just blocking the sub-950 frequencies from making it back to the node.

    Unless Dish is restricing whatever they are bridging from ethernet to certain Moca "channels" there isn't any way to discriminate unless you had a processor to parse the traffic.
    I think the isolator will be a band pass filter blocking the 650-875 MHz spectrum.

    http://www.satelliteguys.us/attachme...1&d=1328637421

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 23rd, 2011
    Posts
    535
    Post Thanks / Like
    Thread Starter

    ADVERTISING BOX


    Quote Originally Posted by gpflepsen

    I think the isolator will be a band pass filter blocking the 650-875 MHz spectrum.

    http://www.satelliteguys.us/attachme...1&d=1328637421
    Then how is the ip conn communicated to the other recs? In what frequencies even?

    Sent from my fingers.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •