Results 7 to 12 of 13
Thread: Acoustical Treatment
-
08-18-2012 02:47 PM #7
- Join Date
- May 29th, 2006
- Location
- Lower Alabama
- Posts
- 16,248
- Post Thanks / Like

- Thread Starter
Yeah, it aint exactly the best.
Dish Network / Top 200 / 2 H(1 HWS) / 1 J
-
08-18-2012 02:47 PM # ADS
Register Today & This Ad Goes Away! Syndicated Advertisement- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
-
08-20-2012 08:20 AM #8
-
08-20-2012 01:00 PM #9
Re: Acoustical Treatment
Tying this into your other thread, about the new sub, keep in mind that the effective volume of the room includes the kitchen/dining room as they aren't sealed off.
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk 2Curmudgeon in Training / Surround Music Enthusiast
Dish Subscriber since 1999
Opinions are my own, not that of any publication I write for.
-
04-22-2013 01:14 AM #10
I've decided to give
ATS Acoustics
a try. I am getting 7 panels from them: 2 on each side to cover early reflections, one behind the center speaker (it's too close to the wall) and two bass traps in the corners.Get rid of this ad below, as well as the link redirect by becoming a Supporting Pub Member
Sent from my iPad 3 using SatelliteGuys
Ilya @ SatelliteGuys.us
-
04-22-2013 10:01 AM #11
ATS panels come in two types: 2-inch and 4-inch thick. 4-inch panels have a somewhat lower WAF, but according to ATS, they are four times more effective at 125Hz bass absorption than 2-inch panels. The price difference is not very big: $46.95 vs. $37.95 for a 24" x 36" panel (and some extra $$ in shipment costs). The two panel types perform equally well at 500Hz and above. Since my room is relatively small, the under 500Hz performance is very important for me. So I decided to go with 4-inch panels.

Get rid of this ad below, as well as the link redirect by becoming a Supporting Pub Member
Ilya @ SatelliteGuys.us
-
04-22-2013 10:56 AM #12From everything I have read, I think that's wise. 2" panels just don't control bass.
ADVERTISING BOX


Register To Reply
