DIRECTV & PAC 12 Network: What's Taking So Long? By Swanni

[MSHAW2715]

I think if this was the ACC or SEC trying this right now we would have the channel or channels as the case may be already.

Interesting, had they not decided to suddenly make this PAC-12 network, all those games would have been on D* in previous years as D* would be showing them on the RSN channels, now that the New Network is here they don't want to come to an agreement.

D* should go for the same price that the RSN were last year.

[NGeorge]

I could see the $14.99 making sense--IF the basic "national" channel is included in the sports pack (I hope it doesn't go to basic since it's just one more thing to jack the price up for everyone) and your "local" feed is included with the Sports Pack or included as an RSN. The $14.99 would get you all the "additional feeds". This is something that cable doesn't offer, and whatever price they hash out for it seems fair--as long as I can get the Cougs with my RSN or Sports Pack I'm happy--if I wanted another one of the "local feeds" I could see it as an extra charge.

[whitewolf8214]

Any word on Directv getting Pac-12 Network as Dish is getting but only in SD? Thank You for help

[lsilvest]

Any word on Directv getting Pac-12 Network as Dish is getting but only in SD? Thank You for help

Dish has a lot of their sports in SD which is unacceptable. Looks like crap on widescreens. That's the reason I'm with D*. Dish has always been poor with sports channels so it's kind of surprising they came to an agreement before D*.

[gadgtfreek]

Get Rid of this Ad! Register Today!

Other than SC and the Ducks, Pac12 tv should pay me to watch their games LOL

$15, pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeze...

[JerryVolunteer]

---

ADVERTISING BOX

---

Other than SC and the Ducks, Pac12 tv should pay me to watch their games LOL

$15, pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeze...

Haha, ill watch Ducks only