Quantcast
Can no longer receive RTV on 87 and 137 W - HBCD modulation No Signal !
Those listed below are our PROUD SatelliteGuys GOLD Sponsors!
Applied Instruments glorystar.tv satelliteavgs tele-satellite.com

Welcome HOME to SatelliteGuys! We are America's Most Popular Satellite Forum!

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 7 to 10 of 10
  1. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 26th, 2011
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    10
    Post Thanks / Like
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by primestar31 View Post
    Yes it is, and it cuts down the signal quality by 1/2 or more.
    According to Chaparral the loss is closer to 1 db, not half or 3 db as you mention. Now I'm not crazy enough to 'tear' out the dielectic slab without damaging the antenna probe.
    RTV on ku is weak, and it's SD not HD (S2). How much loss does the feedhorn cap contribute ? I'll pop it off and see. I've seen some commercial installations that leave them off despite the bug warnings.

  2. # ADS
    Register Today & This Ad Goes Away! Syndicated Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many
            
     
  3. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 26th, 2011
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    10
    Post Thanks / Like
    Thread Starter
    Hi Blind,

    Thanks for chiming in here. No limbs or obstructions here for that satellite. No I don't have another HD box to try. I was really keen about the new Traxis but everybody (dealers) are telling me to stay away...hmm. No the 'bouncing signal' is a Geosat DVB-S2 issue, the standard DVB signals say on 137 W (Alaska nets) are all solid ! So disappointed with this HD stuff, especially since it's totally unnecessary (480interlaced) for classic tv shows.

  4. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 15th, 2005
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    2,014
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by TvMind View Post
    According to Chaparral the loss is closer to 1 db, not half or 3 db as you mention. Now I'm not crazy enough to 'tear' out the dielectic slab without damaging the antenna probe.
    RTV on ku is weak, and it's SD not HD (S2). How much loss does the feedhorn cap contribute ? I'll pop it off and see. I've seen some commercial installations that leave them off despite the bug warnings.
    Ok, I think you misunderstood me. I don't believe Chaparral in this case, because a dielectric plate inserted in a feedhorn to convert to circular signals is going to lose 3 db minimum, because it cuts 1/2 the signal level. That's just how they work, and you can't beat physics no matter what you think. A 3db loss is about the same as using a 7~ foot dish, instead of a 10 foot dish.

    Maybe they can calculate a 1db loss in a perfect world, with a 20 foot dish where there's so much gain to start with or something, but it's false advertising to say there's only a 1db loss in every situation. Even so, 1 db equals a 26% signal loss in a perfect world.

    If you still insist on trying for circular signals, Google "c band waveguide polarizer".

  5. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 26th, 2011
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    10
    Post Thanks / Like
    Thread Starter

    ADVERTISING BOX


    No absolutely, you can't argue with physics. So has anybody tried this, removing the dielectric I mean without damaging anything ?
    I only went for this international feedhorn because it was on special and was practically new, if I knew it was going to cause such a significant loss and all the added grief I would plonked down the extra dineros and bought a regular Corotor II Plus.

    Thanks Primestar for your sensible comments here.


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •