Results 1 to 10 of 20
- 05-13-2007 09:38 AM #1
Pioneer steps up with 1.3a compatiblity!
ADVERTS 1
Those interested in a new 1.3 HDMI recievers might just want to read this:
http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/pn...424387,00.html
THX and Farouda processing!! If these new avrs also support PCM over the HDMI then I think I have found my new AVR replacement!
- 05-13-2007 09:38 AM # ADS
Register Today & This Ad Goes Away! Circuit advertisement- Join Date
- Always
- Posts
- Many
- 05-13-2007 10:30 AM #2
Maybe these possible units as well; will they have 1.3?
Yamaha RX-V861
Onkyo TX-SR505
Onkyo TX-SR575
Onkyo TX-SR605
Onkyo TX-SR705
Onkyo TX-SR805
Onkyo TX-SR875
Onkyo TX-NR905
Sherwood Newcastle R-972
http://crave.cnet.com/8301-1_105-9711535-1.html
...and I am still not sold on any HDMI over what I have now.
DirecTV HR22, H21, H23, HR20, Sanyo PLV-Z 119", Acer H5360 106", Samsung PN51D450 51", Insignia NS-51P680A12 51", Onkyo TX-NR708, Onkyo HT-R550, Sony BDP-S570, Sony PS3 (x2), D-Link Gigabit Network, ViaTalk Unlimited Everything VoIP ($13/mo)
- 05-13-2007 12:17 PM #3
I don't know why they wouldn't support PCM. It is an ancient technology. Pretty standard these days.
The Yamaha doesn't sport HDMI 1.3 or advanced audio codecs. Haven't heard a peep from them. The new onkyos do and have a built in repeater for longer runs. There is always the Denons also.
- 05-13-2007 12:26 PM #4
- Join Date
- Oct 11th, 2003
- Posts
- 2,284 Thread Starter
The lower priced Denon's do not do video processing -- just pass thru and they do not decode TDHD or DTS-HD MA. They will play what is decoded by the player. If the Pioneer which is THX-2 certified does do PCM then I will be getting one of the higher models.
The VSX-92THX has the Farouda processing, decodes both TrueDolbyHD and DTS-HD MA along with THX-2 certification and at $1300 is well within my wheelhouse. I just have to wait till August. I like Pioneer Elite equipment and this particular product is just what I am looking for.
It has not been said by Denon if the mid-range products will do video processing but they should be doing HD audio decoding in the box. This Summer is going to be very exciting for those of us who are looking to upgrade our current avrs!!
I do not know much about Onkyo and maybe someone can chime in here with specs on their new receivers.
- 05-13-2007 12:47 PM #5
The 3808 should do DOlbyTrueHD and DTSMaster. The 1508 and 1708 will not though. Noone really knows what it will do. Denon is always absolutely mum until they post the specs on their website. I would actually prefer the receiver not to do video processing. Faroudja is good but not great. Onkyo is Ok. For an integrated receiver I'd rather have Denon or Yamaha.
S~
- 05-13-2007 05:16 PM #6
- Join Date
- Oct 11th, 2003
- Posts
- 2,284 Thread Starter
If not Faroudja then who for your video processing? Whether in the player or the reciever what differance does that make? If it can do bit-for-bit passage of 1080p 24 hz video how can that be a bad thing? While I currently have a Denon and like it I really would like a nice HDMI receiver and being THX certified cannot be a bad thing. With Denon you only get THX certification on their top model.
On another note, Denon has not reported that their mid-range receivers will decode DTHD or DTS-HD MA. Only that they will be able to play back the decoded signal from the hd player. It will be interesting to see what those receivers will do as they are due in July.
- 05-13-2007 06:19 PM #7
I didn't say it was bad. It is one of the most commonly used processors in AV equipment, especially integrated receivers. There just hasn't been a lot added in the past 4 years. SOmeone is switching to the HQV processors, can't remeber who right off hand. FOund it. Onkyo is it. You don't want your receiver doing all of the work. It needs to be focused on where it matters, audio. Most of the good receivers will pass 1080p 24hz from the source provided you have a monitor that accepts it. The Denon 2807/3806/4806 pass it just fine. If you really want video upconverting, get a video processor. They will do a whole lot more than the receiver will ever be able to do. Otherwise let the player or TV do it.
Like I said. Denon doesn't report anything. They did report at CES that their midline and upperend models would decode HD Audio. The thing with THX certification is it costs a lot of money to certify a product line. Yamaha at one time didn't even bother to have their recievers certified. Just add $$$$ to the price tag. You can get a really nice receiver for what you want with just as good of quality without the THX stamp. Calibrate it correctly and you won't notice the difference.
S~Last edited by teachsac; 05-13-2007 at 06:48 PM.
- 05-13-2007 07:31 PM #8
Agreed, THX tag for most home users is nothing more than a licensing money grab.
DirecTV HR22, H21, H23, HR20, Sanyo PLV-Z 119", Acer H5360 106", Samsung PN51D450 51", Insignia NS-51P680A12 51", Onkyo TX-NR708, Onkyo HT-R550, Sony BDP-S570, Sony PS3 (x2), D-Link Gigabit Network, ViaTalk Unlimited Everything VoIP ($13/mo)
- 05-16-2007 11:45 AM #9
SatelliteGuys Junkie
- Join Date
- Apr 16th, 2007
- Posts
- 4,312
Faroudja was synonymous with high-end 3 years ago.
Reon-VX and Gennum VXP are today's high end. Faroudja in a $1500 AVR is not something to get excited about.
There is a good chance that undecoded lossless audio won't be allowed to be passed for decoding outside the player (or so I read somewhere).
It's probably time to get used to the idea that the player should do the decoding and invest in good power amps instead.
Diogen.
- 05-19-2007 12:43 AM #10
- Join Date
- Oct 11th, 2003
- Posts
- 2,284 Thread Starter
There is a good chance that undecoded lossless audio won't be allowed to be passed for decoding outside the player (or so I read somewhere).
Then explain why manufacturer's are coming out with AVRs that decode these codecs? The same manufacturers that also make the players. Do they know something we don't? Why stick useless technology into an AVR that is not going to be used? Perhaps we do not know the whole story yet on the new codecs. Hasn't the idea behind the use of an AVR is to let the player do the video processing and the AVR do the audio processing? You really think a player will give you the control over the audio codec as well as an AVR?
The idea of the players not being able to pass the native signals to the AVR comes from the possiblity of the PS3 not being able to do that (maybe). No article has yet stated that any of the newer players with HDMI 1.3 would not be able to pass the native signals to the AVR.
As a matter of fact no article has stated without a doubt (facts that prove otherwise) that the PS3 cannot pass native signals. When these new AVRs come out we all might be pleasantly surprised. And yes, we could all be disappointed but that is what happens when you dabble with new technology as an early adopter.

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks