This is a perfect example of why it is always a good idea to have access to a aerial if at all possible. At least you can get it OTA that way.I'll be pissed if I Lose WCAU 10
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active
This is a perfect example of why it is always a good idea to have access to a aerial if at all possible. At least you can get it OTA that way.I'll be pissed if I Lose WCAU 10
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active
Same here I watch absolutely NOTHING on any of these channels. Most of them have went from being good 15-20 years ago USA, Syfy (remember the REAL Sci-Fi Channel), Bravo, to nothing but absolute crap. USA has had some good original programming from time to time, but not in a while (at least to me).I am apparently in the minority but I can't even remember the last time I watched USA Network. Am I missing something? Does the WWE drive its popularity?
It'll come to others soon enough, but Dish always has more than their fare share.It wouldn't be another day without another Dish contract dispute!
For reference, here is a list of channels on Dish that MIGHT be effected:
Telemundo
So out of curiosity, why do you maintain both? That's got to be a hell of a monthly "nut".I have dish and fios so I am good. Fios dumped the weather channel but besides that not to many programming fights . Been with dish for 17 years and countless fighting. Yet my programming cost go up every year. It's just drama.
They weren't listed where I looked. If you want to add them feel free.You forgot about the Telemundo O&Os like WSCV Miami.
If I could have OTA , I would.This is a perfect example of why it is always a good idea to have access to a aerial if at all possible. At least you can get it OTA that way.
Well of course the WWE is going to hype this up, Their channel has the potential of getting dropped.Comcast had the Monday Night Raw announcers hype up this thing. If this was November, Al Michaels and Chris Collinsworth would be doing NBC's dirty work.
also they should not be able to TIE OTA channels to any other NON OTA Channel.I have a lot of feelings on these disputes. I don't think it is fair that a handful of companies own dozens of channels and use the one or two good ones that they have as negotiating tools for all the lousy channels they force the providers to take. We're not privy to the negotiations so we really don't know if allowing contracts to expire are effective in negotiating lower rates. The people subscribing to pay TV are declining each year, and the people left are paying on average $100/mo for TV, so I really think they have a right to be upset about any disruption in service.