Dish quarterly profit misses on pay-TV subscriber losses . . .

dishdude said:

Did old people at the time still have trouble working remotes even being so simple?

Click to expand...

dishdude said:

Did old people at the time still have trouble working remotes even being so simple?

Click to expand...

ncted said:

Not so much with the remote (which was wired)...

Click to expand...

Cheddar_Head said:

I expect that plateau will occur before it is only rural customers left. Why you ask.
1) Increasing fragmentation of the OTT market
-- Subscribe to Disney for that content
-- Subscribe to CruncyRoll for the Anime content that teens want
-- Netflix, just because
-- DNOW or YTTV or Sling for more traditional linear channels and sports
-- ESPN+
-- CBS All Access
-- Hulu
-- etc.
-- or get Dish/DirecTV to meet most of these wants
2) Increasing costs for the OTT providers
-- Some providers are already raising the cost to the consumer
-- Some services are seeing increasing fees from the content providers, Netflix especially
3) Services
-- The user experience of the Hopper3 or Genie is light years better than the cloud "DVRs" offered by OTT

Click to expand...

navychop said:

I had an early Betamax with a wired remote. Got burglarized, still in the box. I replaced it later with a wireless VHS.


Sent from my iPhone using SatelliteGuys

Click to expand...

rvvaquero said:

So, you're the one who made the choice which doomed the future of Sony's VCR standard. I knew I would meet him/her one day.

Click to expand...

TheKrell said:

Only because the buttons were so stiff! You really had to press hard to overcome the spring that fired the hammer into a metal rod inside.


Wired remote on a Betamax? i did not know such things existed.

Click to expand...

ncted said:

It was very similar to this one, but the remote had mode buttons:

1979 Zenith Betamax Programmable Video Director & Remote For Beta Tape Cassettes • $99.00

It had the nice vinyl accent:

http://www.oaktreevintage.com/web_photos/Video/Zenith_Model-VR-9750J_Beta_VCR_web2.jpg

You can kind of see the remote here:

9750J.jpg

Click to expand...

joewhite57 said:

Serious boat anchor!!!

Click to expand...

comfortably_numb said:

I expect it to reach a plateau with fewer losses per year once the only subscribers left are the rural ones.

Click to expand...

Nate Bargmann said:

I'll likely be one as "broadband" as the rest of the world knows it--FTTH--won't happen here in rural AT&T territory.

Click to expand...

nelson61 said:

And this week's news was the feds subsidizing another 1.5 million or so rural connections. They will likely migrate to an internet/tv package.

Drip drip drip

Sent from S10 Plus
using the SatelliteGuys app!

Click to expand...

joewhite57 said:

Not sure what that means exactly, other than I make too much to qualify and above poverty level

Click to expand...

SpaethCo said:

I can see these 2 things being a driver for some people to stay or come back to traditional TV distributors. Some aspects of cloud DVR are great: you don't have to worry about tuners, and your recordings are available on any device anywhere in the US with an Internet connection. The downside is that every service has different restrictions, and you usually have to chain together multiple services to cover all of the channels you might be interested in.

Sling - can't record any of the Disney networks (including ESPN), 50 hours max
Vue - Most locals have DVR restrictions, can't record premiums like HBO (Last week tonight problem), can't pause live TV for more than a minute or two, and recording expire after 28 days
Hulu - have to pay an extra $10 for the privilege of being able to forward past commercials, and even then it doesn't work if you pause LiveTV past a commercial break, it will still force you to watch the commercial breaks as you fast forward.
Youtube - CBS and CW shows are swapped with forced commercial VOD options overnight, record as much as you want for the other networks but recording expire after 9 months.
DirecTV NOW - all that time in beta for a 20 hour DVR that can be summed up in 2 words: train wreck.
FuboTV - Didn't even get series record until a few days ago, and it's still a beta feature. TIVO HAD THIS OVER 20 YEARS AGO.
Philo - Record all you want, but recording expire after 30 days.

Individually these restrictions aren't so bad, but depending on your watch habits this could leave you maintaining DVR inventory across multiple services, and having to track shows to make sure you can watch before the recordings expire or get overwritten.

Overall, I think YoutubeTV has the only DVR implementation that would give cable/sat DVR a run for its money. They do pre-fetch on trick-play so it feels local, with none of the lag that most services have. The obvious downside to YoutubeTV is that their channel selection is somewhat restrictive. They're clearly inking deals to get channels that people will tend to watch live (so mostly news and sports) so that they can turn that into a targeted advertising money maker.

Click to expand...

Brussam said:

For 13 years we have used satellite TV because, as RVers, that is the only way we could rely on getting TV. As we are leaving the road and building a house, I am in a position to finally have enough Internet bandwidth to try streaming. So far I am not impressed.

For one, counting the number of channels I view on a regular basis, streaming from the multiple source to make those channels would add up to a bill that is almost as big as our Dish bill. And those streaming resources are subject to the same price increases from the content makers as Dish is.

What I really don't like with using multiple stream sources is the lack of a common program guide. I like going through my Hopper guide and seeing all that is available to me at the time. One place.

So I hope that Dish stays around long enough for my end of time because I plan to stay with Dish.

Click to expand...

ncted said:

The FCC rural initiatives aren't just about low income. They are supposed to get [almost] every address in the country access to some kind of broadband.

Click to expand...

Nate Bargmann said:

I'm not holding my breath as the likes of AT&T seem to figure out how to funnel those funds into the populated areas. I've been hearing about this or that initiative for rural areas ever since the '96 telecom bill and so far I've seen zip except for the areas served by several independent telcos that actually have to serve their rural customers as they're mostly the only ones they have.

My guess is AT&T will shell game the FCC in order to pay down their debt from buying DirecTV and HBO, etc.

Knowing the crooks AT&T are, I'm not sure I would sign up with them anyway!

Click to expand...