Search results for query: *

Didn't you know, the cable companies make sure that trees are planted in strategic locations.

FSN, FSN, FSN, FSN

FSN has PAC-10 football.

Then move Sunsports to the Sports tier also. They should both be in the same package.

There adding it right with NFLnet and FSN.

Why should FSN be on a sports tier when Sun Sports is not?

They have other programming.

Directv has HD-PPV on channels 180 and 181 also.

When the hurricanes came through here a couple of years ago, cable was out for weeks. With satellite, it may have been out a couple of minutes.

What about FSN, NFL?

Everyone who wants FSN already has Directv or DISH. So BHN is not losing existing subs because of this. But, how many additional subs could they have gotten if they had this channel? Seems like a bad business decision to me to ignore all sports fans. And besides, the sports bars are doing...

Will they get FSN-HD? Or NFL-HD?

What will happen is, since SUN & FSN are owned by the sames people, when the SUN contract is up they will include both in the new contract. So, if this is still an issue then, you will get both or neither.

Cable cannot afford to lose most local programming and expect to not lose significant subscribers.

And what happens after channel 2 and 9 do the same thing?

This is the funniest thing I've heard in a long time.

http://finance.yahoo.com/mp#dish

http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/031022/media_loral_hughes_2.html