ATSC 3.0 Simulcast Discussion

Discussion in 'Over the Air TV By RabbitEars.Info' started by bluegras, Mar 14, 2019.

  1. NYDutch

    NYDutch SatelliteGuys Pro Pub Member / Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2013
    Posts:
    2,022
    Likes Received:
    2,642
    Location:
    Where our wheels go
    Just select the parts that don't apply and delete them.
     
  2. harshness

    harshness SatelliteGuys Master

    Joined:
    May 5, 2007
    Posts:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    2,359
    Location:
    Salem, OR
    You can also highlight what you want to quote and a little balloon will pop up asking if you want to quote or reply to the selected text.

    I use the low-level editor and chop up the text with quote tags.

    It looks like this:
    Code:
    [QUOTE="NYDutch, post: 4348491, member: 190860"]Just select the parts that don't apply and
    delete them.[/QUOTE]You can also highlight what you want to quote and a little balloon will
    pop up asking if you want to quote or reply to the selected text.
    
    I use the low-level editor and chop up the text with quote tags.
     
    ncted and NYDutch like this.
  3. larrykenney

    larrykenney SatelliteGuys Pro Pub Member / Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2004
    Posts:
    546
    Likes Received:
    207
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    From my understanding, when a station changes to ATSC 3.0 it will transmit on the same channel that they transmit on now (or their new one after the repack change). They will have to find another station that will carry their present ATSC 1.0 signal as a sub-channel.
     
    Mr. Sheep likes this.
  4. Trip

    Trip RabbitEars Webmaster Staff Member HERE TO HELP YOU!

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2008
    Posts:
    1,166
    Likes Received:
    585
    Location:
    Alexandria, VA, US
    This is correct.

    - Trip
     
    larrykenney likes this.
  5. NYDutch

    NYDutch SatelliteGuys Pro Pub Member / Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2013
    Posts:
    2,022
    Likes Received:
    2,642
    Location:
    Where our wheels go
    Could they offer ATSC 3.0 on their primary channel and ATSC 1.0 on one of their own sub-channels?
     
  6. Voyager6

    Voyager6 Just lost in space Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Posts:
    12,292
    Likes Received:
    4,106
    Location:
    Sol 3
    Absolutely correct as Trip has noted. The problem will be in metro areas with many stations finding a partner to host their ATSC 1.0 signal WITHOUT degrading the signal to unacceptable levels. Look at how bad many of the sub-channels look now. How will several 1080i channels crammed into one frequency look?
     
  7. Voyager6

    Voyager6 Just lost in space Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Posts:
    12,292
    Likes Received:
    4,106
    Location:
    Sol 3
    I think that would require different transmitters.
     
    NYDutch likes this.
  8. navychop

    navychop Member of the Month - July 2014! Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2005
    Posts:
    47,935
    Likes Received:
    12,894
    Location:
    Northern VA
    3 and 1 are incompatible. They cannot share the same frequency range.

    Think of a channel’s frequency as a bit of mail thru the Post Office. ATSC 1 is a #10 plain envelope. NTSC was a postcard. ATSC 3 is a thumb drive with a stamp and address on it.

    You can have the contents of the #10 as part of what is recorded on the thumb drive, but you’re not going to put that envelope inside the thumb drive.

    Sent from my iPhone using SatelliteGuys
     
    NYDutch likes this.
  9. harshness

    harshness SatelliteGuys Master

    Joined:
    May 5, 2007
    Posts:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    2,359
    Location:
    Salem, OR
    The two modulation schemes can't share an RF channel.

    With respect to subchannels, they can spread them across multiple RF channels now. Subchannels don't run on their own carriers -- they are all multiplexed into a single carrier. They are subsequently demuxed into separate streams that are indexed by PSIP data.
     
  10. harshness

    harshness SatelliteGuys Master

    Joined:
    May 5, 2007
    Posts:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    2,359
    Location:
    Salem, OR
    I question whether it is practical to lighthouse DTV when Next Gen TV is the much more bandwidth-efficient scheme. It seems backwards to me to have to force viewers to rescan every time they need to add, move or remove a subchannel.

    I reason that with Next Gen TV tuners, they could set them up to auto-scan. That isn't possible to do that with most existing DTV tuners.

    I envision some serious backlash if the broadcasters try to make DTV insufferable in order to force viewers to upgrade.
     
    NYDutch likes this.
  11. NYDutch

    NYDutch SatelliteGuys Pro Pub Member / Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2013
    Posts:
    2,022
    Likes Received:
    2,642
    Location:
    Where our wheels go
    Thanks all, obviously I'm not well informed on the ATSC 3 specs...
     
  12. Voyager6

    Voyager6 Just lost in space Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Posts:
    12,292
    Likes Received:
    4,106
    Location:
    Sol 3
    ATSC 3.0 is not backwards compatible with the current ATSC 1.0 standard. That is the reason all the ATSC 1.0 channels would have to be relocated to another ATSC 1.0 channel as a sub-channel (lighthoused) for 5 years if they want to broadcast in ATSC 3.0.
     
    NYDutch likes this.
  13. Trip

    Trip RabbitEars Webmaster Staff Member HERE TO HELP YOU!

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2008
    Posts:
    1,166
    Likes Received:
    585
    Location:
    Alexandria, VA, US
    Welp, not sure what I did. I accidentally split the thread when I meant to change the title, then when I merged it back again with the new title, a bunch of posts disappeared. *sigh*

    EDIT: Making this post appears to have brought the missing posts back. Sorry about that.

    - Trip
     
  14. harshness

    harshness SatelliteGuys Master

    Joined:
    May 5, 2007
    Posts:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    2,359
    Location:
    Salem, OR
    I like that the thread was split as it was wandering well off the track of the Repack and I couldn't find an up-to-date thread to reference.
     
  15. Trip

    Trip RabbitEars Webmaster Staff Member HERE TO HELP YOU!

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2008
    Posts:
    1,166
    Likes Received:
    585
    Location:
    Alexandria, VA, US
    I contemplated splitting it and decided to change the title (which is how it was accidentally split in the first place). Since the original question was about whether or not the repack involved moving to ATSC 3.0, I decided it wasn't really off-topic after all, but that "repack question" was too vague.

    - Trip
     
    NYDutch likes this.
  16. bluegras

    bluegras Topic Starter SatelliteGuys Pro Pub Member / Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    Posts:
    3,256
    Likes Received:
    1,012
    thanks Trip for changing the title here on satguys with NAB coming up in the next couple of weeks be sure to pay attention to alot of broadcasters etc talking about atsc 3.0 and next gentv they will be talking about HDR and my favorite 4k and 8k so there will be alot to go around, thank you :)
     
  17. navychop

    navychop Member of the Month - July 2014! Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2005
    Posts:
    47,935
    Likes Received:
    12,894
    Location:
    Northern VA
    Or the silence will be deafening.


    Sent from my iPhone using SatelliteGuys
     
  18. harshness

    harshness SatelliteGuys Master

    Joined:
    May 5, 2007
    Posts:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    2,359
    Location:
    Salem, OR
    The time for talk is over. Those who are going to do Next Gen TV better get on with it on lose any interest that they've generated.

    Lest anyone get bamboozled by community generated false hope, there's nothing in the spec that includes 8K and even 4K seems unlikely until DTV is gone. Of course if there's no UHD content to broadcast, it is all very academic. Remember 3D?
     
  19. bluegras

    bluegras Topic Starter SatelliteGuys Pro Pub Member / Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    Posts:
    3,256
    Likes Received:
    1,012
    i totally agree with you if you are a tv station time to go with nextgentv is now so that way your audence with new 4ktvs with HDR are wondering where is that new 4k programming you have been promising.8k will be coming in hurry LOL :)
     
  20. bluegras

    bluegras Topic Starter SatelliteGuys Pro Pub Member / Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    Posts:
    3,256
    Likes Received:
    1,012
    https://www.tvtechnology.com/atsc3/atsc-3-0-roadshow-aims-to-teach-station-engineers-basics-of-next-gen-tv

    ATSC 3.0 Roadshow Aims To Teach Station Engineers Basics Of Next Gen TV

    LAS VEGAS—If ATSC 3.0 is to make a successful transition from the standardization process and trial stations into the mainstream, the broadcast engineers responsible for their stations’ technical infrastructure and over-the-air signal delivery will be the ones to whom the responsibility falls.
    Gary SgrignoliRecognizing the critical role of these broadcast engineers, the IEEE Broadcast Technology Society and Gary Sgrignoli, a principal at broadcast technical consultancy Meintel, Sgrignoli & Wallace, are organizing the ATSC 3.0 Roadshow—the Next Gen TV successor to the 10-year-long effort Sgrignoli undertook with his DTV Roadshow to educate engineers about digital TV transmission.
     

Separate names with a comma.

More...