This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Blu-ray Disc Association says it’s too early to lower prices

gadgtfreek

SatelliteGuys Master
Original poster
May 29, 2006
22,105
865
Lower Alabama
TG Daily - Blu-ray Disc Association says it’s too early to lower prices

I think prices are just fine for this Christmas season.

 
Laserdisk II.

Heading for a videophile niche market (not that there is anything wrong with that!)
 
Yep, too early for prices to drop. Too bad (for them) that's not how the market works. We're seeing lower prices a year earlier than I expected.

Kinda already left the niche market, I'd say. Selling faster than laserdiscs at equivalent points, no? Tracking pretty favorably with DVD sales at equivalent points.

Just think, in 2009 as more people know about digital TV, and buy HDTVs, and learn how they can put that HDTV to best use with Blu-ray - sales will continue to accelerate.
 
I, too, believe standalone Blu-ray player prices are in line with how DVD player pricing was at the same point in that format's history (24-30 month era after introduction).

I bought my first DVD player when the format was 2 years old (in the Spring of 1999). I paid over $400 for a Sony S530D DVD player with built in Dolby Digital decoding and 5.1 channel analog output. I replaced that player early in 2002 with a 5-disc Pioneer DVD changer for $250. And then last year I replaced that one with a $80 Sony single disc DVD player with HDMI output (and S-Video connectors).

The point is that $99 or $49 DVD players didn't become available immediately. The first APEX DVD players cost closer to the $200 level. When the first $99 players appeared, most people were very suspicious of them. The price wasn't the main enticement to buy either; it was the region-free capability.

The same rule should hold true with pricing on Blu-ray players. There's little to any profit at all in a sub-$100 DVD player. An electronics salesman can't be expected to waste his breath explaining how a $50 loss-leader device works.

OTOH, I think some aggressive price drops are needed on the "software" side of the equation. I'm not paying $30+ for a bare-bones BD-25 disc from a studio like Fox or Warner Bros. where the 1080p video was sluffed off from a soft looking, dirt speckled, several years old HD telecine master. I can see paying a premium price when the studio bothers to put forth the effort to properly introduce that title to Blu-ray -particularly if it's a new release title with lots of HD-quality extras. I'm not buying it at all if they're just going to go through the motions, use old transfers, single layer discs and still want the same money. To hell with that. That especially holds true if I already own a copy of that movie on DVD. The movie studios need to offer more incentive to upgrade. They're doing it on some titles, but definitely not all.
 
Yes. I believe the production capacity is now coming on line to support more releases.
 
Id like to know where you "prices are absurd" guys were when DVD came out.

Dvd launched in NA in what, 1997??

I paid $299 for a Sony DVD player Feb '00. Looks like BR is on course to me, some of you have just failed to realize it.
 
One thing that might accelerate BD adoption (just as it did later with DVD) is the existence of online rental services like Netflix/Blockbuster. Even if they both raise prices for BD access, for the price of buying one movie/month, you can rent any where from 15-30 in that same time. If it wasn't for that service, I don't know that I would have gone Blu as soon as I did, sticking to premium cable for HD movies instead.
 
I think prices are absurd and when blue-ray won the war it put consumers years behind. Wont touch a bluray player until they break the $200 mark.

I got my second one, a Sammy 1500 for $80. All I had to do was buy a Sammy 52A650 with it!