Differences Between The 811 and 211?

[Mr Ranger]

Currently have a 811 and am wondering what advantages the 211 has? The 811 is somewhat sluggish when changing channels yet still miles better than My Comcast DVR. Is the 211 any better? I understand the 211 is able to handle MPG4 yet really don't know if that is much of a benefit.

Thanks
Mr Ranger

 

[Mr Tony]

The 211 has MEPG4 capabilities which means you can get your HD locals through Dish (if available) and the newer HD channels that have been added recently

 

[Mr Ranger]

Thanks Iceberg, sounds like if I want the locals I'll have to upgrade.

 

[Mr Tony]

correct. Can you not get them OTA?

 

[webbydude]

Aside from the aforementioned MPEG4 channels, I've found the channel changing and reboots to be faster with the 211 vs. the 811.

The only thing I wish Dish had incorporated into the 211 is the UHF antenna/remote capability. What a wonderful idea they had when it was placed in the 811, but didn't carry it over to the upgraded receiver (cost-cutting, perhaps?)

 

[Lee Smith]

The 811 has analog OTA in addition to the digital OTA. The 211 only has digital OTA.

I find that the 211 will not make a digital OTA available if there is any PSIP inconsistancy but the 811 will map the channel.

I currently have both and am about to get rid of my 811 and get another 211. I miss the MPEG4 channels that are available on the 211.

 

[Mr Ranger]

correct. Can you not get them OTA?

Yes, however to record them off air is something I am not familiar with. And if the 211 is indeed faster at changing channels, is reason enough to switch.

 

[RandallA]

I've had both receivers and the 211 is a better receiver in all aspects. To me, SD looks a lot better in the 211 than in the 811 even if you use the RF output.

 

[BobaBird]

211 has HDMI instead of DVI, also adds 3-hour widescreen guide option.

See HDTV Receiver Features on the EKB.