FCC filing for the T16 satellite (finally!)

Status
Please reply by conversation.
H

HoTat2

Thread Starter
SatelliteGuys Pro
Jun 12, 2012
1,295
337
Los Angeles, CA.
AT&T/DIRECTV finally submitted the official filing for the long anticipated "T16" satellite.

Notify going to License

Haven't read the entire narrative yet, but looks to be just like T15 and destined for 103W?

With T15 supposedly to move back there as well?

Don't get it ...

Was certain it was going to 101W to relieve T15 to go back to 103W.

Oh well ... enjoy anyway ...


Sent from my LG-H932 using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: whitewolf8214
nelson61

nelson61

SatelliteGuys Master
Lifetime Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
7,508
6,813
Where it's Warm
Looking at the GIMS contours - just a simple conus+ type satellite with KA/BSS 17/24 Ghz/KU payload beams.
Not licensed for KU transmission at the 103W location,
I will convert it to Google Earth kmz for reference .
 
nelson61

nelson61

SatelliteGuys Master
Lifetime Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
7,508
6,813
Where it's Warm
AT&T/DIRECTV finally submitted the official filing for the long anticipated "T16" satellite.

Notify going to License

Haven't read the entire narrative yet, but looks to be just like T15 and destined for 103W?

With T15 supposedly to move back there as well?

Don't get it ...

Was certain it was going to 101W to relieve T15 to go back to 103W.

Oh well ... enjoy anyway ...

Sent from my LG-H932 using Tapatalk

Looks like a spare which could be parked at 103W.
Or they could use one for KA and the other for BSS 17/24.
 
H

HoTat2

Thread Starter
SatelliteGuys Pro
Jun 12, 2012
1,295
337
Los Angeles, CA.
Looks like a spare which could be parked at 103W.
Or they could use one for KA and the other for BSS 17/24.
Yeah, but how is the SD transition going to work with both T15 and T16 having permanent assignments to 103W?

One of them obviously has to remain at 101W for its needed Ku DBS band payload.

Sent from my LG-H932 using Tapatalk
 
S

slice1900

SatelliteGuys Pro
Feb 14, 2015
1,596
716
IA
They obviously won't leave them both at 103. Since they are essentially identical I think it is very likely T15's "temporary" move to 101 will become permanent.

The only reason they'd swap them back is if one of them has a hardware issue with a transponder or something (i.e. if one has a bad Ku transponder they'd want it at 103, if one has a bad Ka or RDBS transponder they'd want it at 101)
 
  • Like
Reactions: whitewolf8214
nelson61

nelson61

SatelliteGuys Master
Lifetime Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
7,508
6,813
Where it's Warm
Factoid from the filing:

"All new DIRECTV subscribers, and over 90% of the total DIRECTV customer base, subscribe to HD services"

So something less than 2 million customers have SD service
 
Juan

Juan

Supporting Founder
Supporting Founder
Sep 14, 2003
29,037
7,121
Moscow Russia
Factoid from the filing:

"All new DIRECTV subscribers, and over 90% of the total DIRECTV customer base, subscribe to HD services"

So something less than 2 million customers have SD service
What about those who have both?

Sent from my SM-G950U using the SatelliteGuys app!
 
  • Like
Reactions: harshness
H

HoTat2

Thread Starter
SatelliteGuys Pro
Jun 12, 2012
1,295
337
Los Angeles, CA.
What about those who have both?

Sent from my SM-G950U using the SatelliteGuys app!
All DBS Ku MPEG-2 only receivers must go, whether on sole SD accounts or those mixed with HD receivers ...

The big unknown though leading to all the speculation and debate is exactly how and on what schedule the old MPEG-2 DSS transmission format will disappear. And what (if anything at all for 110 and 119W) will replace it on the DBS transponders licensed to DIRECTV almost from its inception at 101, 110, and 119W.

It assuredly seems the SD local spotbeams from 101 and 119W are the first to be all eliminated by sometime next year.

As for what comes next after that. No one can state for certain, even though slice and others here can offer some very good guesses.

Sent from my LG-H932 using Tapatalk
 
S

slice1900

SatelliteGuys Pro
Feb 14, 2015
1,596
716
IA
The last data point we had for SD subscribers was in 2013, when there were 5 million of them. So they've been doing a good job of getting rid of them via attrition.

I wonder whether SD subscribers in an MPEG4 only market who have R22s instead of D1x are counted in that "over 90%" or not. Those people won't need upgrades.
 
H

HoTat2

Thread Starter
SatelliteGuys Pro
Jun 12, 2012
1,295
337
Los Angeles, CA.
I wonder though with T15 now parked at 101W and will soon start lighting up its DBS Ku band payload. That even if (God forbid) T16 suffers a catastrophic launch failure next year, which would only garanttee T15 stays put until a replacement is built.

Isn't it safe to say Hawaii subs. can soon select for new installs, or ditch their current AK/HI dish if they choose, for standard Slimlines. And PR subs. (while perhaps among the least of their concerns post-Maria) use SL3 LNBs. What with the CONUS+ spot mirrors for both carried by T15?

Sent from my LG-H932 using Tapatalk
 
raoul5788

raoul5788

Studebaker driver
Staff member
HERE TO HELP YOU!
Supporting Founder
Lifetime Supporter
Dec 28, 2004
31,604
15,596
Cheshire CT
The last data point we had for SD subscribers was in 2013, when there were 5 million of them. So they've been doing a good job of getting rid of them via attrition.

I wonder whether SD subscribers in an MPEG4 only market who have R22s instead of D1x are counted in that "over 90%" or not. Those people won't need upgrades.
I'd guess that the number of R22 only (no hd equipment) owners is very low.
 
S

slice1900

SatelliteGuys Pro
Feb 14, 2015
1,596
716
IA
I wonder though with T15 now parked at 101W and will soon start lighting up its DBS Ku band payload. That even if (God forbid) T16 suffers a catastrophic launch failure next year, which would only garanttee T15 stays put until a replacement is built.

Isn't it safe to say Hawaii subs. can soon select for new installs, or ditch their current AK/HI dish if they choose, for standard Slimlines. And PR subs. (while perhaps among the least of their concerns post-Maria) use SL3 LNBs. What with the CONUS+ spot mirrors for both carried by T15?

Sent from my LG-H932 using Tapatalk

If T16 really will launch and go operational in Q1 of next year, then they must be in a real hurry to do something that made them move T15 to 101 and target T16's launch for 103.

The only thing I can think of as far as what that "something" might be is that D5 is maybe on its last legs and they can't wait until T16 launches retire it and get Puerto Rico using 101 for their guide data etc. Given the timelines in the letters they've been sending out, I don't see how they can be ready to shut down the spot beams on 101 yet, which doesn't leave a lot of room for anything else to be the reason. They'd need to free up those spotbeams if they were going to migrate the contents of G3C or 119's CONUS to 101.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goaliebob99
nelson61

nelson61

SatelliteGuys Master
Lifetime Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
7,508
6,813
Where it's Warm
If T16 really will launch and go operational in Q1 of next year, then they must be in a real hurry to do something that made them move T15 to 101 and target T16's launch for 103.

The only thing I can think of as far as what that "something" might be is that D5 is maybe on its last legs and they can't wait until T16 launches retire it and get Puerto Rico using 101 for their guide data etc. Given the timelines in the letters they've been sending out, I don't see how they can be ready to shut down the spot beams on 101 yet, which doesn't leave a lot of room for anything else to be the reason. They'd need to free up those spotbeams if they were going to migrate the contents of G3C or 119's CONUS to 101.
Directv always has been secretive about the condition of their satellites. They release no data. Dish is quite the opposite and documents degradation or fuel problems in their quarterly 10k reports.

Sent from my SM-G955U1 using the SatelliteGuys app!
 
H

HoTat2

Thread Starter
SatelliteGuys Pro
Jun 12, 2012
1,295
337
Los Angeles, CA.
Directv always has been secretive about the condition of their satellites. They release no data. Dish is quite the opposite and documents degradation or fuel problems in their quarterly 10k reports.

Sent from my SM-G955U1 using the SatelliteGuys app!
Oh, much agreed ....

In fact if it weren't for FCC public filing requirements and the analytical work of datadigesters on the iamanedgecutter site today, no doubt we'd know next to nothing about the technical details of DIRECTV's satellite fleet.


Sent from my LG-H932 using Tapatalk
 
TheRatPatrol

TheRatPatrol

SatelliteGuys Pro
Nov 1, 2004
470
159
This will obviously give them some more bandwidth, correct?

So I guess satellite TV isn’t going away, as some have stated? :)
 
H

HoTat2

Thread Starter
SatelliteGuys Pro
Jun 12, 2012
1,295
337
Los Angeles, CA.
This will obviously give them some more bandwidth, correct?

So I guess satellite TV isn’t going away, as some have stated? :)
Specifically T15 will give an increase in "CONUS+" wide bandwidth at 101W, yes ...

That is, whenever the LiL spotbeam tps. on T4S/T9S are shutdown freeing up 6 additional tp. channels for CONUS+ service.

It will also give PR more bandwidth on the DBS Ku band by allowing their subs. to see the 32 tps. at 101W instead of limited to only the three at 110W.

And while not actually bandwidth related, T15 at 101W will also allow Hawaii subs. a hugh advantage by allowing them to ditch the big, ugly, and awkward 1.2m AK/HI dish for standard Slimlines.

Sent from my LG-H932 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
S

slice1900

SatelliteGuys Pro
Feb 14, 2015
1,596
716
IA
This will obviously give them some more bandwidth, correct?

So I guess satellite TV isn’t going away, as some have stated? :)

Yes, all the people who said AT&T was going to drop satellite within a few years look pretty stupid now, with AT&T about to launch a brand new satellite :)
 
Bruce

Bruce

Bender and Chloe, the real Members of the Year
Supporting Founder
Lifetime Supporter
Nov 29, 2003
7,952
8,349
Yes, all the people who said AT&T was going to drop satellite within a few years look pretty stupid now, with AT&T about to launch a brand new satellite :)

That was ordered and planned well before AT&T bought DirecTV, all the talk about DirecTV going internet came directly from AT&T after the purchase.

I do think it will happen but not for about 10 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goaliebob99
goaliebob99

goaliebob99

SatelliteGuys Master
Supporting Founder
Aug 5, 2004
14,482
518
-.-. .... .. -.-. .- --. ---
AT&T/DIRECTV finally submitted the official filing for the long anticipated "T16" satellite.

Notify going to License

Haven't read the entire narrative yet, but looks to be just like T15 and destined for 103W?

With T15 supposedly to move back there as well?

Don't get it ...

Was certain it was going to 101W to relieve T15 to go back to 103W.

Oh well ... enjoy anyway ...


Sent from my LG-H932 using Tapatalk

I'm wondering if they are testing at 103W and will move T16 later to 101, or if they decided to save on fuel and just leave T15 at 101 satisfied with its mission there. I'm not sure how much fuel is used to drift a satellite, but I would imagine that one way would use more than the other with the way the earth spins. That also could be calculated into this occasion. Interesting to see T16 go to 103W. The less fuel you use, the more life you get out of the bird.
 
navychop

navychop

Member of the Month - July 2014!
Pub Member / Supporter
Lifetime Supporter
Jul 20, 2005
54,544
19,799
Northern VA
It takes very little fuel to change orbit out there, if you’re in no hurry. Just go a little higher or a little lower.


Sent from my iPhone using the SatelliteGuys app!
 
Status
Please reply by conversation.

Similar threads

goaliebob99
Replies
4
Views
1K
slice1900
S
TRSmudge
Replies
1
Views
893
BlueEos
BlueEos
dfergie
Replies
6
Views
1K
jcrandall
jcrandall
M
Replies
7
Views
1K
mcintire123
mcintire123
Top