Fox Blocks Millions of DISH Customers (2 Viewers)

Scott Greczkowski

Thread Starter
Welcome HOME to SatelliteGuys!
Staff member
HERE TO HELP YOU!
Sep 7, 2003
99,052
16,755
Newington, CT
Fox Blocks Millions of DISH Customers from Local Channels, Cable Networks
- Fox removes local channels in 17 markets across 23 states and D.C.
- Fox pulls cable networks including FS1, FS2, Big 10 Network, Fox Soccer Plus and Fox Deportes
- Fox rejects DISH offer to extend contract

ENGLEWOOD, Colo., Sept. 26, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- DISH today reported that Fox Corporation blocked DISH customers' access to its local channels in 17 markets across 23 states and the District of Columbia (the full list of affected stations can be viewed here). Fox has also removed cable networks FS1, FS2, Big 10 Network, Fox Soccer Plus and Fox Deportes.



Fox is demanding a double-digit percentage rate increase for continued carriage of its local channels. Fox is also attempting to "force bundle" its local channels and unrelated cable networks to get more money and gain negotiating leverage.

At its May investor day, Fox executives promoted their plan to increase retransmission revenue by 62 percent, to $2.6 billion by 2022.

"Taken together, Fox's actions are profoundly anti-consumer," said Andy LeCuyer, DISH senior vice president of Programming. "Fox is raising prices and turning its back on its public obligation to provide channels to consumers for free. It's clear that Fox cares more about padding its bottom line than serving its viewers."

"To add insult to injury, Fox pulled its channels right as viewers head into the heart of the NFL and college football season," continued LeCuyer. "We ask Fox to stop punishing its own viewers so we can focus on reaching a fair deal."

Affected DISH customers can view NFL games using an over-the-air antenna or stream local and most primetime games for free on mobile phones and tablets as via the NFL App.

Consumer Choice and Forced Bundling at Issue

In addition to blacking out local stations, Fox has also blocked DISH customers' access to its cable networks FS1, FS2, Big 10 Network, Fox Soccer Plus and Fox Deportes. Fox is attempting to get more money by "force bundling" its unrelated cable networks and leveraging its local channels.

"Fox is using local viewers as leverage to get more money for unrelated channels," said LeCuyer. "We simply don't think it's fair to use local viewers to raise rates on expensive, unrelated sports programming."

DISH Offer of Extension, True Up Rejected

DISH and Fox had been making steady progress in their recent negotiations, and DISH was hopeful that they would come to a mutual agreement to renew carriage of its local stations. In that spirit, DISH offered a short-term contract extension to Fox that would include a retroactive true-up when new rates were agreed upon, and would preserve the ability of DISH customers to access the Fox stations while negotiations continued. The true-up would ensure that Fox was made whole at the new rates for the period of any contract extension.

"Fox had nothing to lose and consumers had everything to gain by leaving its channels up," said LeCuyer. "Instead, Fox chose to harm its own viewers."

DISH Offers Free Antenna Installation, Alternative Viewing Options Available

As DISH works to reach an agreement, the company is offering digital over-the-air antennas at no cost to customers in the affected markets. Customers who use a digital antenna are able to access news, sports and popular network shows from Fox, and have the option to completely drop their local channels from their programming package to save $12 on their monthly bill. DISH will install an antenna for qualifying customers in Fox markets based on the reception available at their home.

"A digital antenna is a great experience and solution for a growing number of customers," continued LeCuyer. "The channels integrate seamlessly into the Hopper interface. Plus, switching to antenna-delivered locals can unlock $144 savings annually. We want to give customers the choice to save money."

Local station availability over the air is dependent on geographic location and topography. Consequently, some customer locations may not qualify for an antenna installation.

Another viewing alternative is offered by Locast, a free nonprofit service that provides local broadcast channels over the internet in select markets. Locast is available on connected DISH Hopper devices. Customers can visit locast.org to learn more.

Need for Retransmission Consent Reform

"Fox is using its mix of local and national channels against viewers, abusing outdated laws to try to force consumers to pay more. This greedy attempt to extort more money from our customers is one of the main reasons we – and our industry – are asking Congress to restore balance in the broadcaster-pay TV equation," said Jeff Blum, DISH senior vice president of Public Policy and Government Affairs. "We are asking lawmakers to reform outdated TV laws to give our customers the best viewing experience at an affordable price – without the threat of broadcaster blackouts."

Along with other pay-TV companies and public interest groups that form the American Television Alliance, DISH has called for the U.S. Congress to revamp the out-of-date laws that favor these high fees and unnecessary blackouts.

Blum continued: "We continue to urge the FCC and Congress to update a system that emboldens broadcasters to black out consumers."

Rising Retransmission Rates

Each year, the cost to carry local broadcast stations rises far beyond the rate of inflation, leading to blackouts across the country that affect millions of subscribers of various pay-TV companies. According to Kagan, a leading source on the media industry, broadcast fees burdening pay-TV consumers are expected to reach an unprecedented $16.3 billion in 2024. These same rates, for channels available free over the air, were as low as $215 million in 2005. With a current annual increase of as much as 40 percent, the cost to deliver local channels is the fastest growing part of consumers' monthly pay-TV bills.

DISH customers can visit DISHPromise.com for more information.
 
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell

kevincburns

Well-Known SatelliteGuys Member
Apr 30, 2012
29
13
Norman, OK
I lost my local FOX affiliate in this one but Dish Support over the phone and via chat said I'm not eligible for the OTA antenna. I'm about 25 miles from the towers and have picked up FOX and the other major networks using an amplified indoor antenna before. Can I appeal? What would I need to connect my own antenna to the Hopper? I'd prefer a permanently mounted one from Dish but I'll make it work temporarily for football games :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: crodrules

comfortably_numb

Dogs have owners, cats have staff
Pub Member / Supporter
Nov 30, 2011
11,097
11,740
Missouri/Kansas
Here's the issue I have with this headline:

Fox Blocks Millions of DISH Customers from Local Channels, Cable Networks
- Fox removes local channels in 17 markets across 23 states and D.C.
- Fox pulls cable networks including FS1, FS2, Big 10 Network, Fox Soccer Plus and Fox Deportes
- Fox rejects DISH offer to extend contract

Fox bad, Fox evil, Fox did this, Fox did that. Consumers don't care who did what or why. They have no incentive to give Dish a pass because supposedly they "care." They want their channels and they want them now.
 

olds403

SatelliteGuys Pro
Feb 3, 2009
425
342
michigan
I guess you are okay with rising rates and forced bundling to increase Fox revenues. I am not. I am glad that Dish tries to negotiate better deals, I would hate it if they just agreed to every single rate increase proposed by every network, that would get REAL expensive really fast.
 

sam_gordon

SatelliteGuys Pro
May 21, 2009
2,200
996
Lexington, ky
Here's the issue I have with this headline:

Fox Blocks Millions of DISH Customers from Local Channels, Cable Networks
- Fox removes local channels in 17 markets across 23 states and D.C.
- Fox pulls cable networks including FS1, FS2, Big 10 Network, Fox Soccer Plus and Fox Deportes
- Fox rejects DISH offer to extend contract


Fox bad, Fox evil, Fox did this, Fox did that. Consumers don't care who did what or why. They have no incentive to give Dish a pass because supposedly they "care." They want their channels and they want them now.
Of course. It's a press release from Dish. I bet if you find Fox's release it will be "Dish bad, Dish evil, Dish did this, Dish did that".

NOTE: I'm not defending Fox just pointing out both sides spin the facts to fit their narrative.
 

Howard Simmons

SatelliteGuys Pro
Lifetime Supporter
Jun 25, 2018
1,813
1,441
Northwest Florida
Where did this come from all of a sudden. How come we didn't notice it. Usually they give people a heads up! Is FX and FXX going to be next. I'm getting tired of this. I just got my FOX station back from the Meredith fiasco but now I have the RSN and this. The Dish promise page is getting filled up with BLACKED out channels and it's not funny anymore.:oldmad:oldmad:oldmad:oldmad:oldmad:oldmad
 

comfortably_numb

Dogs have owners, cats have staff
Pub Member / Supporter
Nov 30, 2011
11,097
11,740
Missouri/Kansas
I guess you are okay with rising rates and forced bundling to increase Fox revenues. I am not. I am glad that Dish tries to negotiate better deals, I would hate it if they just agreed to every single rate increase proposed by every network, that would get REAL expensive really fast.

I'm not ok with a provider that will soon have no channels. Pick your poison. BTW, I cut the cord nearly a year ago, so I have no dog in this fight. I am just trying to provide outside consumer perspective.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crodrules and DWS44

Tampa8

Supporting Founder
Pub Member / Supporter
Lifetime Supporter
Sep 8, 2003
17,949
7,391
Tampa/Eastern Ct
No effect for me as FOX News is not affected. I get the local in Tampa OTA. It should not be allowed to group locals with cable channels in a contact unless FOX wants to give up all rights to must carry for those local channels. I'm betting DISH has no desire to pay much for FS channels maybe except the Big 10. I wish DISH would petition the FCC to see if they can get locals to not be associated with and held hostage with cable channels.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KAB and crodrules

Users who are viewing this thread

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Latest posts

Top