How accurate are lyngsat footprint figures for c band

Status
Please reply by conversation.

LW1000

New Member
Original poster
Sep 26, 2009
1
0
So. Cal.
After reading some posts in this C-Band section, we're wondering if the lyngsat footprint numbers are not accurate. We want to limit our dish to a 120cm miniBUD for our location near Los Angeles because we want to use our available Pansat PM900 motor which should handle dish sizes up to 1.2M.

The lyngsat site shows a recommended size of 100-120cm for most of the sats we're interested in, but we're beginning to suspect that a 6 or 8 footer may be required. Do anyone have good experience receiving C-Band sats in Los Angeles with a 1.2 miniBUD?

Thanks for any replies..
 
Register to hide this ad
The problem is not so much getting the signal.
The problem is rejecting the signal from the satellite next door.

reading material:

Linuxman on C-band with 1m round Primestar - satellite list
http://www.satelliteguys.us/free-ai...mestar-mini-bud-experiment-7.html#post1509116

PopCornNmore does C on 1.2m ChannelMaster & C2, with brackets 'n pix!:
http://www.satelliteguys.us/free-air-fta-discussion/181803-conical-scalar-ring-test-results.html

Iceberg and knowmiddlename signal reports on 1.2m dishes:
http://www.satelliteguys.us/free-air-fta-discussion/188490-minibud-1-2m.html

edit
:
give a list of the channels you are trying to get.
some may be impossible on a 10' dish, so best to get that sorted out from the start. ;)
 
Status
Please reply by conversation.

VBox can not keep track of location

Commercial DCII Receivers

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Latest posts