Picture fuzzy to viewers

Sean Mota

SatelliteGuys Master
Original poster
Supporting Founder
Sep 8, 2003
19,039
1,739
New York City
<<Entire Article here>>

By CRAYTON HARRISON / The Dallas Morning News

Essay: Falling in love again - with HDTV
Chances are, Mr. Sophisticated has just paid a lot of money to watch the same old picture blown up to a bigger size. If he's like most high-definition TV set owners, he doesn't really have high-def programming on the screen.

0524hdtvchart.jpg
Less than one in four owners of HDTV sets actually subscribe to cable or satellite channels that broadcast in crisp, clear high-def. In other words, fewer than 2 percent of television-owning households – about 2 million homes – subscribe to HD programming, though nearly 9 percent own an HDTV-ready set. About 1.2 million households have digital tuners to get HD signals over the airwaves.

Broadcasters aren't terribly concerned that many HDTV owners aren't watching HD programs. Consumers will eventually migrate to HD programming, they say, noting the resources the industry and government have put into HDTV's development.

"This is no different than every technology before it," said Mark Cuban, president of high-definition network HDNet LLC, in an e-mail. "The market will grow as the price points of HDTVs fall."

But the disparity shows that just persuading consumers to buy newfangled televisions won't automatically create HD-craving viewers. HD broadcasters still have several obstacles to surmount to build an audience:

• Indifference. Many HDTV set owners don't know why they'd want HD programming, believing they already have a good-looking picture on their digital screens.

"Anything put into their TV set looks better," said Lee Simonson, a purchasing executive at Best Buy Co.

• Confusion. Some consumers think they're getting high-definition pictures when they're not.

"You'll talk to a guy who's got an HDTV monitor and has digital cable, and he brags about having HDTV, and you're like, 'No you don't, you have digital cable and a really nice monitor,' " said Jenny Miller, a spokeswoman for the Consumer Electronics Association.

• Few choices. Until November, Comcast Corp.'s cable subscribers in the Dallas area couldn't subscribe to HD channels even if they wanted to. Satellite services such as News Corp.'s DirecTV and EchoStar Communications Corp.'s Dish Network began offering HD packages earlier, but their packages of channels have only recently expanded.


Timing their entry

Broadcasters are trying to delicately time their entries into HD programming. If they jump in too early, they'll lose money on channels that can't attract advertising because of poor viewership. If they wait too long, viewers may have built loyalty to other channels.

The Discovery Channel took the leap last year, unveiling the nature documentary-rich Discovery HD Theater channel. The timing was finally right, said Clint Stinchcomb, a senior vice president at the channel, owned by Discovery Communications Inc.

"I think there is a combination of factors in place today that have never been in place before," he said. "HD set prices are declining. Set-top box prices are declining, and that's enabled cable to roll it out aggressively. And there's pressure from the FCC to make the conversion, so you're seeing increased content."

The availability and variety of HD content has improved. Cable operators now offer HDTV channels in 99 of the top 100 television markets, making it possible to send HD to 84 million of the 108 million television-watching U.S. households, including most cable viewers in the Dallas-Fort Worth area.

DirecTV and Dish Network have offered HD channels for years. A third service launched last year, Voom, offers the widest variety of HD content, with 21 exclusive HD channels.

Both cable and satellite now have more content to carry. ESPN, Bravo and Discovery launched their HD channels last year, joining stalwarts HBO and Showtime, which started their HD channels in 1999 and 2000, respectively. Mr. Cuban's HDNet has been available on DirecTV since 2001 and joined Dish Network's lineup last year.

More channels are on the way, including HD versions of TNT and the Outdoor Channel. Broadcast networks, meanwhile, are offering more content in HD, and cable and satellite providers are beginning to include those programs in their services.

HD enthusiasts believe more choices will persuade people to buy subscriptions for HD programming. But many consumers still don't know what HD programming is.

A Consumer Electronics Association survey in September asked respondents across the country whether high-definition TV and digital TV were the same thing. (They're not – HDTV is a form of digital TV.) About 55 percent answered correctly, but 21 percent were wrong and 24 percent said they didn't know the answer.

"They'll tell stories about some guy who walks up and says, 'I've got HDTV,' and it becomes clear as the conversation goes on that he has digital cable," Mr. Rodriguez said. "There's this frustration. There's just this confusion."

Even people who own televisions capable of displaying HD programming don't necessarily understand what HD is, and some don't appear greatly concerned with the quality of the image on their screens.

Consumers have no choice but to move to HD programming eventually, said Mr. Cuban, who also owns the Dallas Mavericks.

"People buy what is sold to them," he said. "As the price point of HD set-top boxes fall, then [major cable operators] will push people towards HD set-top boxes simply because they want to push people in that direction."
 
Thanks Sean. This is interesting. I clicked the link and read the whole thing, and found this little tidbit in there.

It's the "cul-de-sac" effect, said Mr. Stinchcomb of the Discovery Channel. People will see a movie or a football game in HD at the neighbor's house and will want the same experience at their own homes.

"Seeing is selling," he said.


I think that statement shows how important it is to put Voom in front of the potential customer's face, while they are in the store. And if the sales force is properly trained, they should be able to explain programming options to the customer. That's why I don't like the idea of exclusive contracts between stores and content providers, but that will probably never change.
 
Sean Mota said:
Consumers have no choice but to move to HD programming eventually, said Mr. Cuban, who also owns the Dallas Mavericks.
BOLOGNA, has Mark Cuban lost his mind?
 
vurbano said:
BOLOGNA, has Mark Cuban lost his mind?

Well, what I hope he's referring to is the analog spectrum being gradually turned off and as digital broadcasting takes over and folks get a taste of it, they will no longer be satisfied with SD programs. This I hope will be accellerated by mandating digital tuners in all sets sold in the future which commences shortly for certain size TV's. Eventually, albeit slower than it should, providers will get on the band wagon or will be left behind. This will, or should be, enhanced by the proliferation of digital displays and consequent price drops of obtaining one.

My prediction (fingers crossed :) ) is that by 2007 half of what we watch will be HD.
 
My G/F's dad has a large Sammy DLP with Direct TV hooked up via S-Video :( Why spend so much on the TV and run crap into it? I need to get him over to watch some Voom and get him signed up!
 
Ominous1 said:
My G/F's dad has a large Sammy DLP with Direct TV hooked up via S-Video :( Why spend so much on the TV and run crap into it? I need to get him over to watch some Voom and get him signed up!
First things first, show him the improved quality of component and DVI cables.
 
vurbano said:
BOLOGNA, has Mark Cuban lost his mind?

Yes, a long, long time ago, and I never thought I would defend him BUT...He is the most vocal promoter for HD programming there is currently.
 
in my experiences at bestbuy and a few local tv shops is that salesperson is usuallly more than eager to show how much better hd is.i always get what their set up is and it is usually always more than what you would expect a sales clerk to have for a ht.with about everyone having internet these days, there should be no excuse for someone having digital cable and thinking that it is high def.although my cousin purchased a real nice hd set and bought a regular dvd player, and i thought he was tech savy.i took my progressive scan over and showed him.so maybe for everyone not informed there will be one that is, to correct them.if you check out all the major stores like best buy, you will see that almost all big screens being sold there today are hd.i personally like circuit city, because of the reviews attached right to the item.voom should ad in there infomercial allot of information about disinformation.they should explain that if you currently have digital cable or regular satellite, you are not getting hd programming.burst their bubble a bit and maybe they will do some research and then decide on voom.,
 
Showing is not the answer...

I know some us have hashed this argument out in other areas but I still think many people feel, "If we show them good pq/aq in our own homes they'll want the same thing in theirs." This is far from the case. As I've said in other posts, I, like many of you, have quite a nice home theater setup. I now have Voom with some kick-butt HD programming. I've been into home theater for about 14 years now and have shown my setup (has been pretty good from the beginning and gotten better as my salary increased) to countless people. You want to know how many of those people went out and bought even a basic home theater setup? Zero. Absolutely zero. Sure, they rave about it, heck, my best friend used to take people into my condo (he was my neighbor and watched the cat when I was gone) to show off my setup. But he never went out and spent the money on it and neither did anyone else.

In the article Sean posted it was mentioned that most people feel they've got the channel already so why bother with HD? As I've mentioned in the past, if there is ANY inconvenience, whether it's switching providers or costing more money, most people just won't do it. They feel they already can watch the Discovery Channel. HD is nice but I don't want to deal with the incovenience/expense of getting HD programming into my house.

What I think we need to do is keep telling our friends/associates about Voom. Keep showing off our setups. But this alone will not do much to convert people. Voom needs to make sure people know it doesn't cost more than a DTV/Dish setup. In fact, it's less money! Start getting those people just getting their HDTVs and tell them, "Hey, now that you've got an HDTV why not take advantage of it? Voom offers more HD programming than anyone else and it's no more expensive than what you're used to paying." This will start to get more people into Voom and into HD in general.

I wish it were as easy as just showing off what we've got but it's just not that easy. Most people just don't care that much about what their setup looks/sounds like. It's just not a priority to most people out there.

The Rickster
 
jwaltz666 said:
The keyword is eventually

he's right. I think the timeframe for this is certainly up for debate though.
Yes, maybe my "grandchildren" will "have too". An I do mean maybe. He is assuming that standard digital which isnt even mandated yet and that may take 10 years to happen (remember its 80% of homes must be SD capable in addition to the 2006 dream date). He is speculating on the death of the next standard!! That is yearsssssssss away!!! Its like me saying that eventually we will all have to have solar powered cars, well yeah someday oil will run out I suppose.
 
DarrellP said:
That prediction is today for me, HD is all I watch.

;) My prediction (fingers crossed) is that by 2007 half of what is available to watch will be HD.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)