SCOTUS rules in favor of DTV arbitration clause

  • WELCOME TO THE NEW SERVER!

    If you are seeing this you are on our new server WELCOME HOME!

    While the new server is online Scott is still working on the backend including the cachine. But the site is usable while the work is being completes!

    Thank you for your patience and again WELCOME HOME!

    CLICK THE X IN THE TOP RIGHT CORNER OF THE BOX TO DISMISS THIS MESSAGE
Status
Please reply by conversation.
Thanks. But a one sentence article?
???

Is this what you are looking for:

"
The Supreme Court has ruled that California customers cannot band together to file a class-action lawsuit against satellite television provider DirecTV over early termination fees.

The justices ruled 6-3 Monday that DirecTV’s contracts bar customers from filing class actions and that the El Segundo-based company can insist on individual arbitration to resolve disputes."
 
Speaking of ...

Has anyone heard if the ATT purchase will CHANGE the 24 month commitment or anything else in that area of info ?

I understand they are not going to let people OUT of thier contract just because of the merger .... which most figured would be the case, except those wanting to get out somehow.
 
I haven't heard anything about changing the commitment on our end however they typically don't tell us anything new until after it's implemented. :what
 
Status
Please reply by conversation.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Latest posts