I didn't count each list but it looks like there's fewer 3D movies in 2012 than 2011. Shouldn't it be the other way around ?Here are the 63 2011 and 2012 3d movies. Yep that a lot of 3d...
I didn't count each list but it looks like there's fewer 3D movies in 2012 than 2011. Shouldn't it be the other way around ?Here are the 63 2011 and 2012 3d movies. Yep that a lot of 3d...
Many of the dark scenes in the previous two Batman movies were impossible to see in 2D.No 3D for Next Batman Movie? - ComingSoon.net The dark scenes in it will be impossible to see much if anything in them as well. Excellent News: No 'Batman 3D' - |
I'm not a mathematician, and don't have access to the tools required for the following complex calculations. But, with less than four months into 2012, it appears that this year is on its way to surpass 2011 pretty easily.I didn't count each list but it looks like there's fewer 3D movies in 2012 than 2011. Shouldn't it be the other way around ?
I'm not a mathematician, and don't have access to the tools required for the following complex calculations. But, with less than four months into 2012, it appears that this year is on its way to surpass 2011 pretty easily.
Again, that's without the use of a slide rule or Cray supercomputer. So, my calculations could be a little off.
Until 2012 is over, one cannot accurately count the number of 3D films released. I'm sure the number of 3D films announced at the beginning of 2011 was not the same as the number actually released that year.Based on a quick google and some box office searches there were 40 domestically released (there were a few overseas only films) 3d films in 2011. As of today there are 36 3D films for 2012, but there are also gaps in the theatrical release list that may or may not be in 3D.
Be a smart-ass all you want. The list includes dates up to December so it would appear to be a "complete" (to some extent) list. Movies aren't made and released with 3 months notice so there won't be dozens and dozens of add'l 3D movies that no one knew about....I'm not a mathematician, and don't have access to the tools required for the following complex calculations. But, with less than four months into 2012, it appears that this year is on its way to surpass 2011 pretty easily.
Again, that's without the use of a slide rule or Cray supercomputer. So, my calculations could be a little off.
You have the "smart" part right, anyway.Be a smart-ass all you want. The list includes dates up to December so it would appear to be a "complete" (to some extent) list. Movies aren't made and released with 3 months notice so there won't be dozens and dozens of add'l 3D movies that no one knew about....
Yes, and there at least two on his list already released NOT in 3d. Cabin In The Woods most recently. Gross revenue trumps 3d hard *ns. 2011 was down 18% from 2010 in grosss revenue which was only 19% of the average total gross per film, average. We need more business degrees around here.I didn't count each list but it looks like there's fewer 3D movies in 2012 than 2011. Shouldn't it be the other way around ?
Until 2012 is over, one cannot accurately count the number of 3D films released. I'm sure the number of 3D films announced at the beginning of 2011 was not the same as the number actually released that year.
Sorry if my making sense has thrown you off. I realize that logic and rational thought is a bit unusual for these sorts of forums and for the Internet in general.
You shouldn't need a supercomputer to multiply a two digit number by four (unless you're from California where they don't teach multiplication tables).Again, that's without the use of a slide rule or Cray supercomputer. So, my calculations could be a little off.
It's a good thing I'm not from California then. (I'm from NY, where they teach kicking asses.)You shouldn't need a supercomputer to multiply a two digit number by four (unless you're from California where they don't teach multiplication tables).
Good point. The trend is certainly worth looking at. But, I wouldn't start calling it dead, if there were only a few more, or even the same number of 3D titles as last year. It could be due to wait-and-see from the studios.It would seem to me just the fact we are talking a few 3D movies either below, at, or above last year is not a good sign for 3D. Shouldn't it be much more, with no question there is an ongoing increase in 3D?
harshness said:You shouldn't need a supercomputer to multiply a two digit number by four (unless you're from California where they don't teach multiplication tables).