who wants puro's avatar back???

was puros avatar appropriate for this site?

  • no, i cant control my kids

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • no, my 17 year old shouldnt be looking at good looking girls

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • no, my boys name should be nancy and he really liked eltons WEDDING

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • i love my hubby, but i eat bon bons all day, and i cant compete!!

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    7
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Scott is this a record for the fastest growing thread?

I think I'm done in this thread. Fun has run out. :)
 
SatinKzo said:
yep, our blacklist is ridiculously long. We have now outsourced the maint on it as it was insane to keep on top of.
Hmm, Maybe I'll add dbstalk to it :)


Yep and it ADDS TO THE COST of running the company!
 
charper1 said:
HE HE I love semantics. It STILL the company DIME. Any IT department worth their pay will have anything that IS offensive, any adult site blacklisted.
How is my breaktime and lunchtime "the company DIME?" Boy, you must really work for slavedrivers! :) Sorry, that's MY time, and I can use it to surf if I want--the internet connection is on and paid for whether I use it or not.

charper1 said:
That avatar is/was so non-offensive this thread grows even funnier, now we have switched gears trying to use WORK as an excuse.
What's non-offensive to you obviously was offensive or insulting to some others. I didn't say anything until the obviously slanted poll was put up. If no input is wanted, then don't ask. If I'm insulted enough, I'll let Scott know. As it was, I didn't like it, but figured it would only last through the holiday season and then would be gone anyway. I try to pick my battles carefully and wouldn't bother with this one unless it continued or increased.

Scott has to remember that there are not only males viewing this site, despite one poster's protest that it (the poll?) was only for men.
 
charper1 said:
Yep and it ADDS TO THE COST of running the company!
Actually it's part of the service we already paid for. Because we outsourced it, we actually saved money on IT staff. They can work on other things now.
 
charper, you and i agree for a change!!

she caught him ogling the avatar.....sweet

she was not a member...anything that was posted before her joining is NONE of HER business..its her HUSBANDS business, whom she caught and then joined her up to save his bed rights.....sorry
 
Charise said:
How is my breaktime and lunchtime "the company DIME?" Boy, you must really work for slavedrivers! :) Sorry, that's MY time, and I can use it to surf if I want--the internet connection is on and paid for whether I use it or not..

The PC, the connection to the net, the IT help to maintain it all, the work to maintain the blacklist - making sure "you people" don't stumble into something, fighting viral & worm attacks thanks to your uneducated surfing, etc. It all adds up. People that do not know anything past their own job, always forget about the behind the scenes and what all goes on when they are off the clock. Hilarious, this thread really has died. The lack of common sense in the US (yes I live here too) is so funny. We all want this idiot proofed for personal use.

HE HE - see ya Dragon, SatinK - the lessons some of these folks need outside of their own existance.
 
Last edited:
charper1 said:
We all agree BUT there was NO ADULT photo or pornography. This is another blatant exaggeration.
That is what makes this so funny. You didn't see anything but yet you still say pornography.
Glad I made you laugh, it is my mission in Life.

No, I said "pornography", as in "some people may call it, quote, pornography, un-quote." We are talking about the animated GIF of the Santa's Helpers, right? That's all I've seen that someone might find offensive.

Take my current avatar: Some might be offended by the immature bathroom humor, others might see it as humorous, more will see it and not even notice. I'll keep it up until it snows here again since all our Christmas snow has melted.
 
dragon002 said:
charper,
the thing that scalleds me, she became a member just to complain,,,,
no one on here BITCHED, NO ONE EVEN mentioned it.
she drew attention to it ,, as all activists do...
dont want to see it , dont COME on to the site.


You are correct! I am an activist - just like Martin Luther King, Abraham Lincoln, etc. I teach my children and students to stand up for what they believe in. Our world would never progress if people did not take a stand for their convictions. I stated my beliefs in a respectful manner being careful to state they were MY opinions. I did not degrade anyone else in the process. Nor did I ask for the avatar to be pulled in any of my posts. I have the right to state my opinion which is what I did. I was surprised the avatar was pulled, but I stand behind my belief that it is not appropriate for this web site. For other web sites, there is nothing wrong with it.

I did not realize that you could "turn off" the avatars. If I did, I would have taken that option.
 
charper1 said:
The PC, the connection to the net, the IT help to maintain it all, the work to maintain the blacklist - making sure "you people" don't stumble into something, fighting viral & worm attacks thanks to your uneducated surfing, etc. It all adds up. People that do not know anything past their own job, always forget about the behind the scenes and what all goes on when they are off the clock. Hilarious, this thread really has died. The lack of common sense in the US (yes I live here too) is so funny. We all want this idiot proofed for personal use.

I wish more people realized what the support services do. So many times we get accussed of doing nothing cause their PC's "are working fine, no problems whatsoever"

Believe me, I am not saying where I work is a freaking animal house of internet actvivity. All I am saying is, a little personal web access seems to recharge people a bit.
Now everyone is heavily restricted yes, but they can read the news or check personal email on their breaks. Only a priveledged few can DL or UL anything through the network. The worst is the pesonal email, but since it is only web based that is allowed and most webmail check their stuff already for baddies and we restrict pretty much everyone from installing or running programs that are not on the approved Group Policy list we have in my 3 years at my site, never had one malicious code problem.

I was gonna head off a while ago, but this got even more interesting.
 
Last edited:
charper1 said:
The PC, the connection to the net, the IT help to maintain it all, the work to maintain the blacklist - making sure "you people" don't stumble into something, fighting viral & worm attacks thanks to your uneducated surfing, etc. It all adds up. People that do not know anything past their own job, always forget about the behind the scenes and what all goes on when they are off the clock.
Since you don't know my job, just know that I do have the authority to use my "off" time to use the web and my preference is to not view avatars like the subject one. Just my preference, which was solicited by the poll.
 
she is a teacher, and probably a democrat, loves tenure and .....shudder....is teaching YOUR kids, MINE go to catholic school... probably voted for gore and kerry and is left leaning, one more thing, hates puros avatar ,,, but tells the kids being gay or lesbian is OK.....and IT IS NOT
 
Since work has been brought up, I will say that the avatar in question would be in violation of our Sexual Harassment Policies. Knowingly bringing in such material (if viewed by someone else who wanted to get me in trouble) could lead to disciplinary action, up to termination. It's nice to know that if I ever need to, I can turn off the avatars while away from home.
 
dragon002 said:
she is a teacher, and probably a democrat, loves tenure and .....shudder....is teaching YOUR kids, MINE go to catholic school... probably voted for gore and kerry and is left leaning, one more thing, hates puros avatar ,,, but tells the kids being gay or lesbian is OK.....and IT IS NOT

No offense to you dragon, but with that post, I am done with this thread. :)
 
dragon002 said:
she is a teacher, and probably a democrat, loves tenure and .....shudder....is teaching YOUR kids, MINE go to catholic school... probably voted for gore and kerry and is left leaning, one more thing, hates puros avatar ,,, but tells the kids being gay or lesbian is OK.....and IT IS NOT
Nice try, but mostly wrong!:D
 
As much as I enjoyed Puro's avatars I have to side with the moral majority on this one, because the site is open to people of all ages and its implied format is for television and that the only place on the site that there is a warning wich is the backroom that implies to anyone visiting that they should expect to find the site to be safe for any age and any enviroment that they are in. I'm still on the fence as to what effects these images have on our society as a whole considering that countries outside of the united states seem to treat partial and or full nudity in public forums as every day aspects of life while we still cling archaic puritan idea's from our own dark ages.
 
dragon002 said:
she is a teacher, and probably a democrat, loves tenure and .....shudder....is teaching YOUR kids, MINE go to catholic school... probably voted for gore and kerry and is left leaning, one more thing, hates puros avatar ,,, but tells the kids being gay or lesbian is OK.....and IT IS NOT

Im a guy and even I can see that your taking this way to personal, definitely in poor taste and the sign of someone grasping at straws.
 
dragon002 said:
charper, you and i agree for a change!!
she caught him ogling the avatar.....sweet
she was not a member...anything that was posted before her joining is NONE of HER business..its her HUSBANDS business, whom she caught and then joined her up to save his bed rights.....sorry

Are we threatened males and this is the only way we can fight back???? You sound like the stereotypical "catty" women. Argue logically - like a "man";)

My husband mentioned the photos to me. If he were into self-preservation, he would be on this thread defending me. He is not. He understands that I am able to think for myself and this is my battle.
 
Van said:
Im a guy and even I can see that your taking this way to personal, definitely in poor taste and the sign of someone grasping at straws.

van,

i am grasping at nothing, she needs to mind her own buisness.

she was not a member before she complained.

she walked in on something her husband should have had control over, and now she is going to tell 15000 people what to watch!!!


sorry girl, go buy a life.
 
but he is not defending you, he probably printed out puros avatar and is........ sorry

give it a break, happy new year, i hope you have boys soon, believe you WILL change that song and dance!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Latest posts