Playstation 3: Not the best Blu-ray player you can buy

teamerickson

SatelliteGuys Pro
Original poster
Jan 20, 2006
1,716
0
El Dorado Hills, CA
Playstation 3: Not the best Blu-ray player you can buy - DVDTOWN.com

A lot of debate is currently going on concerning the Blu-ray capabilities of the Playstation 3.

Many people (including myself) consider it one of the best Blu-ray options right now, perhaps only topped by the just-released Panasonic DMP BD30. The main reason for this has been that the PS3 is upgradeable to both Blu-ray profile 1.1 (Bonus View) and coming profile 2.0 (BD Live) and, of course, an attractive price tag compared to dedicated players.

However, many say that the picture quality of the unit is not at par with its stand-alone competition. Being a Playstation 3 owner, my eye caught the following headline in the latest edition of Home Cinema Choice Magazine. "Sony's PS3 is the best Blu-ray player you can buy." The headline was in a "Fact or Fiction" section of the magazine. Guess what: the magazine gave the notion a "Fiction" seal.

The reason they gave: "Increasingly, the Blu-ray performance of the PS3 doesn't really stand up to videophile scrutiny. While its excellent clarity and fine detail reproduction is without question, motion is not the console's strongest point. Fast panning shots in Sony's own flagship 'Casino Royale,' are prone to stutter, whereas the company's own dedicated players render the same scenes perfectly. It is also prone to visual artifacts not seen on the latest dedicated players."

A few comments before PS3 fans go crazy. This is not the first time I have heard this in direct comparison tests, and I have personally witnessed some of these artifacts on my own Playstation 3. Plus, I have found the missing 5.1 analog outs, Bluetooth remote not backlit, no DTS-HD support, no IR receiver build in for multifunction remotes, power consumption, and form factor to be annoying as well in the way I use my player.

Personally, I knew that my PS3 would only be a temporary Blu-ray player of choice in my own main home theater setup. However, at the time there was no real competition to the unit in terms of price and features. With the Panasonic DMP BD30 and upcoming profile 2.0 players, the PS3 no longer seems the obvious choice unless you also want to use it for games.

So, if you are the kind of people who think about movies first and games later or perhaps never, it might be a good idea to stay cool and await this summer and fall's impressive line-up of dedicated Blu-ray players before going HD. Can't wait? Perhaps you should check out the Panasonic DMP BD30.

Personally, I'm waiting for Pioneer to go profile 2.0 before I replace my PS3.

Lastly, my comments should in no way be seen as an attack on the Playstation 3. I'm only trying to keep you all in the know and give you valuable information before upgrading to Blu-ray playback.
 
It just reiterates the fact that Sony is not good at software.
They have good engineers but software was never their strong side...

Since PS3 was designed for 10 years (or something like that), they might get it eventually...

Diogen.
 
If you don't care about picture quality. You can shine a turd all you want, but it's still a turd.

Have you ever owned a PS3 and seen it in action compared to a standalone? If so, was the PQ difference that noticable?

Regardless of what the article says, the PS3 is a more than adequate BD player, and the only one with profile 2.0 at the present moment. I have noticed no PQ problems sitting at close range to my 34" 1080i Toshiba CRT while watching a BD disc on the PS3. The difference between it and broadcast HD is staggering.

My biggest complaint was the lack of resume play functionality which has been addressed in newest update (along with a mosquito noise reduction feature). 5.1 analog audio out would be great, but how many BD players under $500 have that?
 
My biggest complaint was the lack of resume play functionality which has been addressed in newest update (along with a mosquito noise reduction feature). 5.1 analog audio out would be great, but how many BD players under $500 have that?

All BD standalones have 5.1 analog out. It's the Toshiba/Venturer HD DVD players that differ in that regard.
 
All BD standalones have 5.1 analog out. It's the Toshiba/Venturer HD DVD players that differ in that regard.

Unless I'm missing something, I don't think the Samsung 1400 or the Sony S300 have six channel (5.1) analog outputs on them, though the Panasonic BD30 appears to. Any others for under $500?
 
So you buy a PS3 for lets say $400, when comparable Blu-Rays were $600. You saved $200.(which for some of us is a much easier sell to the other half) You use the PS3 for 2 years, enjoying the major improvement over regular DVD, building up a BluRay library, as well as the game machine end of it. At the end of 2 years, you can pick up a better Blu-ray for $200, (again an easier sell to the other half), and you have the best of both worlds.

Play the game of electronic economics*, and get more in the long run.


*electronic economics, the only industry where you get more in 3 years for substantially less money.
 
Unless I'm missing something, I don't think the Samsung 1400 or the Sony S300 have six channel (5.1) analog outputs on them, though the Panasonic BD30 appears to. Any others for under $500?
The Samsung 1400 has 5.1 analog out and decodes. The BD30 has 5.1 analog but doesn't decode.
 
Not counting the PS3 and LG BH-200 (dual format) the only standalone that doesn't have at least 5.1 analog outs is the Denon DVD-2500BTCI. It is a transport system.

S~
 
Hmmmmm? I guess I assumed that if it didn't decode internaly it didn't have 5.1.

Sorry, wrong assumption. I have not heard if the Samsung 1500 will have anlog outs or not as it isn't supposed to decode internally either. I'm sure it will though.

S~
 
The PS3 does a lot of good things. But, I do not think it is a perfect player. But, as mentioned above it can have updates to make it better. I will continue to use mine until they have BD standalones that blow it out of the water.

Eventually the standalone processing power will be shrunk down enough to handle everything BD can throw at it and cost a couple bucks. Then a cheap player will be able to outdo the PS3.

I just view the PS3 as a way to view BD until the players have the bugs all worked out. At least the PS3 gets updated a lot and keeps improving.
 
Damn, people get really picky.

The PS3 is a darn good player for the money, and whoever brings up the whole PQ discussion...please bring up an image comparison side to side and show me the huge difference in PQ from a valid* website + link.
 
The standard Blu ray players can't play Call of Duty 4.... I'm just sayin.
 
Damn, people get really picky.

The PS3 is a darn good player for the money, and whoever brings up the whole PQ discussion...please bring up an image comparison side to side and show me the huge difference in PQ from a valid* website + link.

Well then show me a huge difference in PQ between a good upconverted dvd and blu ray. Different yes, huge it's not.
 

Request to keep the War Zone open longer

Sammy and LG not so keen on Blu's future?

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)