Introducing the Tablo ATSC 3.0 QUAD HDMI – A Tablo DVR for NextGen TV

Comptech

SatelliteGuys Pro
Jun 26, 2006
3,633
2,786
Travelers Rest SC
Proud to say, i have no cloud storage or tracking and proud of it. Clear my cookies and cache daily. I hate being followed.
Even my cell phone tracking is off and never use maps or GPS. Phone and text only.
 

comfortably_numb

Dogs have owners, cats have staff
Pub Member / Supporter
Nov 30, 2011
17,832
26,128
Kansas City / Las Vegas
Here in Connecticut our CBS looks amazing on the 3.0 feed when compared to the 1.0 feed

Scott, I must correct myself. I didn't have Microsoft's HEVC driver (costs 99 cents) installed at the time. Now I'm watching 3.0 using HD Homerun's Microsoft Store app and the picture on the 3.0 feeds is amazing compared to the 1.0 feeds.
 

comfortably_numb

Dogs have owners, cats have staff
Pub Member / Supporter
Nov 30, 2011
17,832
26,128
Kansas City / Las Vegas
  • Like
Reactions: FTA4PA

primestar31

SatelliteGuys Master
Lifetime Supporter
Mar 15, 2005
13,557
14,008
Beta Omicron Delta III
Oh boy, I wonder what this means for the future of Hd Homerun 4k tuners, and tv sets with 3.0 tuners already in peoples hands?

For that matter, I think it's not lawful to encrypt regular OTA signals.
Ok, I pm'ed Tablo on Facebook to ask them about it. Here's what I got:

ME:
I saw your post about the delay of the ATSC 3.0 Tablo, because of the new need to install "encryption keys" that you claim can't be loaded later via a firmware update. How can providers legally encrypt FREE OTA tv signals? IMO, they can't because it would obsolete all the 3.0 tuners already in the market. That is, IF the Tablo post on your website is true?

Tablo answer:
Hi Michael - Thanks for touching base about the addition of DRM to the Tablo ATSC 3.0 QUAD. Adding DRM does requires 'keys' to be 'burnt in' at the factory during manufacturing. While products that already have some level of DRM can have that updated later via software, this DVR did not have that in the original plans.

We don't have deep details on the specific types of ATSC 3.0 content that will get DRM encryption but that the A3SA is leading the charge and we wanted the product to have this support to ensure full compatibility with whatever happens in the future.

My reply to that:
That makes sense as a "just in case" scenario. However, I still don't think OTA providers will be allowed to encrypt OTA signals. Now, IF they do some sort of "pay tv" subscription with special channels, that's different. However, in that case, would the new Tablo be able to support THAT situation?

Tablo reply to that:
We are aiming for Level 1 Widevine compliance, which will allow us to support the full suite of ATSC 3.0 features.

My reply to that one:
That's awesome! Thanks.
 

dweber

SatelliteGuys Pro
Pub Member / Supporter
Jul 29, 2005
1,778
2,552
Plain City, OH
ATSC 3.0 is currently used to deliver PayTV in some cases. Evoca requires a separate receiver so the Silicondust ATSC 3.0 receivers and the current TV’s that have ATSC 3.0 tuners would not receive Evoca’s broadcasts.

Startup company Evoca, for instance, has taken over the digital spectrum of two low-power stations in Boise, Idaho, to provide more than 70 over-the-air channels of high-resolution subscription programming. It’s a virtual MVPD. But instead of relying solely on the internet to delivery video, Evoca mostly uses the ATSC 3.0 over-the-air broadcast standard. Evoca Early Access subscribers pay just $20 a month through the end of the year. Evoca plans to charge $49 for its service, which includes a free receiver, more than 45 channels and a free HD antenna that allows users to receive ATSC 1.0 broadcast signals over the air -- and avoid paying hefty retransmission fees to local TV stations.
 

Trip

RabbitEars Webmaster
Staff member
HERE TO HELP YOU!
Jun 21, 2008
1,399
924
Alexandria, VA, US
I've been watching very warily for the introduction of signing and DRM into 3.0. If it begins to appear and interferes with the ability to watch content on receivers like the HDHR-4K, the streams will be identified on RabbitEars with the standard "lock" icon used for encrypted streams. (See, for example, the Evoca stations.)

I'm not inherently opposed to signing to prevent tampering by a man-in-the-middle attack or something like that, assuming it works properly and doesn't impact the user. (Your connection to SatelliteGuys is encrypted and that doesn't require a fee or limit your usage, to give a sense of what I mean.) I am, however, opposed to DRM that restricts the availability of otherwise-free programming.

- Trip
 

Phil T

SatelliteGuys Pro
Sep 8, 2003
297
100
Littleton, Colorado
ATSC 3.0 is currently used to deliver PayTV in some cases. Evoca requires a separate receiver so the Silicondust ATSC 3.0 receivers and the current TV’s that have ATSC 3.0 tuners would not receive Evoca’s broadcasts.

Startup company Evoca, for instance, has taken over the digital spectrum of two low-power stations in Boise, Idaho, to provide more than 70 over-the-air channels of high-resolution subscription programming. It’s a virtual MVPD. But instead of relying solely on the internet to delivery video, Evoca mostly uses the ATSC 3.0 over-the-air broadcast standard. Evoca Early Access subscribers pay just $20 a month through the end of the year. Evoca plans to charge $49 for its service, which includes a free receiver, more than 45 channels and a free HD antenna that allows users to receive ATSC 1.0 broadcast signals over the air -- and avoid paying hefty retransmission fees to local TV stations.
I have been using Evoca for about a month now. From what I can tell they do not have an agreement with any stations in Denver yet but deliver their channels and our regional sports channels via IPTV. In Denver they are charging $25 a month and $5 for the receiver. Price is guaranteed for 2 years.
 

primestar31

SatelliteGuys Master
Lifetime Supporter
Mar 15, 2005
13,557
14,008
Beta Omicron Delta III

Attachments

  • HDHR4kDRM.jpg
    HDHR4kDRM.jpg
    93.1 KB · Views: 117

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 4)