Rainbow Media Unveils DIVINE HD First Ever 24/7 High-Definition Gay Movie Channel Exc

Status
Not open for further replies.

rang1995

Supporting Founder
Supporting Founder
Sep 30, 2003
904
0
Bergen co NJ
red ufo said:
I agree we need a Sci Fi HD channel.

Is there enuff gay content for a 24 hour channel? I mean how many Patrick Swazee movies are there?

Swazee is gay???Didn't know that, havn't seen much of him of late

All rock hudson movies, judy garland (a fav) Victor victoria, (which we have seen a lot of) you can fill this up with movies alone use you imagination...and you can have movies that woulnt offend anyone ,but i guess that's not the idea of this channel
 

occammd

SatelliteGuys Pro
Apr 19, 2004
397
0
Sean,

By "we" doing well, I meant the discussion.
I don't believe evolution and Christianity are mutally exclusive.

Can you imagine what people are thinking if they tune into this thread without reading the rest of it?
 

andrzej

Board Certified User
Supporting Founder
Feb 18, 2004
690
0
Boston subs
occammd said:
I don't believe evolution and Christianity are mutally exclusive.

Indeed, many Christians believe in evolution but I would say it is tough to accept evolution if you take the whole Bible (especially the Old Testament) as the Truth about the origins of civilization.
 

squicken

Member
Supporting Founder
Mar 24, 2004
1,046
0
red ufo said:
Is there enuff gay content for a 24 hour channel? I mean how many Patrick Swazee movies are there?

Awesome :clap There have been so many good one-liners on this thread. And how come nobody's mention BRAVO-HD Cirque du Soleil is so . . . you know. Same with West Wing :p And to whoever mentioned Will & Grace. The show's last two seasons have had poor ratings. CSI is killing it. I still think this channel, and all the other Voom originals, will have trouble filling their roster w compelling content.

Further, I cannot endore the Epics channel until it includes Braveheart. Patton is great, but Braveheart is the ultimate Epic. IMO
 

thugnerd

Member
May 13, 2004
11
0
USA
red ufo said:
Can you imagine if they came out with the 'straight channel'? That would cause an even bigger uproar than the various gay channels cumming into action now.

we already have about 200 or 300 of them

red ufo said:
Or how about the 'White Entertainment Televsion'. Which would be denounced as ractist even though they have special interests for black, white, spanish, now gay but besides Spike TV or Playboy, no overt white christian straight guy networks.
Once again, thats pretty much every Amerikan television channel that exists already.



Its kind of hard to hear you with the sheet over your head.

C
 

squicken

Member
Supporting Founder
Mar 24, 2004
1,046
0
thugnerd said:
Its kind of hard to hear you with the sheet over your head.

C

If your going to say something so hatefull, you need to back it up better. Just because someone expresses an opinion contrary to your own does not make them a racist.
 

occammd

SatelliteGuys Pro
Apr 19, 2004
397
0
It was good debating/talking w/you guys, but the addition of rex and thugnerd took this in the wrong direction. Take Care
 

red ufo

SatelliteGuys Family
Mar 25, 2004
106
0
thug,

You proved my point. The meer suggestion to 'level the playing field'. A channel with 'white' or 'straight' as the theme simply cannot exist. Sure most of TV has white people but they don't make an announcement of a network with it as the theme. We live in a world when every minority can have a group, or a sat channel except the poor old straight white male. Even a consideration of this idea is slammed as racist. Talk about thought police.

Its reverse racism and sexism. Do I support any channels like that? Hell no but discusssion or the non disscussion of it is interesting in itself. Because 'straight' and 'white' are forbidden from grouping together into a special interest like everyone else can. I think its fascinating how everyone gets a special nitch on TV but them.

Are they other forbidden fruits besides white and straight that aren't allowed bandwidth on the planet? Perhaps a channel for nonpartisan facts is forbidden too?
 

DenR

Well-Known SatelliteGuys Member
Sep 14, 2003
29
0
red ufo said:
thug,

You proved my point. The meer suggestion to 'level the playing field'. A channel with 'white' or 'straight' as the theme simply cannot exist. Sure most of TV has white people but they don't make an announcement of a network with it as the theme. We live in a world when every minority can have a group, or a sat channel except the poor old straight white male. Even a consideration of this idea is slammed as racist. Talk about thought police.

Its reverse racism and sexism. Do I support any channels like that? Hell no but discusssion or the non disscussion of it is interesting in itself. Because 'straight' and 'white' are forbidden from grouping together into a special interest like everyone else can. I think its fascinating how everyone gets a special nitch on TV but them.

Are they other forbidden fruits besides white and straight that aren't allowed bandwidth on the planet? Perhaps a channel for nonpartisan facts is forbidden too?


What kind of shows would you put on a "white" channel?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Latest posts