Tim Burton's "Alice in Wonderland"

mike123abc

Too many cables
Supporting Founder
Sep 25, 2003
25,357
4,604
Norman, OK
I thought about seeing it, but given the mixed reviews I do not really want to pay the high 3D price quite yet.
 

mike123abc

Too many cables
Supporting Founder
Sep 25, 2003
25,357
4,604
Norman, OK
Well I went to see it anyways. I decided I could go during the matinée today.... It still was $10 for the ticket. 3D was ok. I still do not like everything having to be in 3D now to inflate ticket prices. But, given that most of this was animated, it was a good fit.

The movie was enjoyable, but fell flat in some areas. Just not as good as I thought it should be given the cast.
 

thowe21

SatelliteGuys Pro
Feb 26, 2007
429
0
Torrance, CA
I don't remember the original movie since I saw it as a kid, but I enjoyed this version. The 3D was great (yeah they do upcharge for it) but IMO it was worth it. I understand that the movie is actually based on both books from the author. Helena Bonham Carter stole the show as the Red Queen.
 

willowrun

Member
Mar 12, 2010
5
0
kernersville, nc
It was worth the local area "$3.00 no frills seat"- Mr Depp was ....subdued....but just as pretty as Avatar and well worth kids to see! It wasn't creepie but had some sly humor- the Chessie was great!
 

navychop

Member of the Month - July 2014!
Pub Member / Supporter
Lifetime Supporter
Jul 20, 2005
60,002
27,260
Northern VA
Didn't know that. Thought it was 3D from the git go. But it's somewhat reassuring that it wasn't the finest example of the art. However, I expect it'll be like "HD" - lot's of bun, little beef.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)