Tribune Broadcasting Company Blacks Out DISH Customers in 33 Markets;

Or, how Tribune is demanding Dish include WGN to all markets outside of Chicago if they want their locate stations back?

If you are talking about WGN America, it was actually added to the majority of (if not all) cable/IPTV systems IN the Chicago DMA as well around the 1st of this year, when they removed the rest of the Chicago content. Both satellite providers were already carrying it in the Chicago DMA for quite some time already.
WGN-A IS now considered a basic cable channel & NOT a superstation - just like what happened with TBS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jamesjimcie
May be both rumor and/or speculation but, here’s the site:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribune_Media

Retransmission Litigation History
The retransmission agreement between Tribune Media and DISH Network came to an inelegant halt for millions of DISH viewing customers in a wide geographic array of markets on June 12, 2016 when DISH Network on the behalf of its customers chose not to accept Tribune Media's inappropriately large increase (2.4 times the expired contract rate) to the retransmitting consent contract fee. June 20, 2016 Dish Network filed a lawsuit against Tribune Broadcasting and accused the retransmission company (Tribune Media Company) of deliberately spreading false statements about the DISH Network in their retransmission consent fee value disagreement.
I have a hard time believe a website that anyone can edit (and the "fact" can't be supported from other sites).

Also, assuming this is a multi-year deal, is the increase amount from year one? Year three? All combined?
 
I have a hard time believe a website that anyone can edit (and the "fact" can't be supported from other sites).

Also, assuming this is a multi-year deal, is the increase amount from year one? Year three? All combined?
Wikipedia is useful when the articles are properly cited with sources. Otherwise, the info can be suspect. But it's not all bad like some like to claim.
 
Wikipedia is useful when the articles are properly cited with sources. Otherwise, the info can be suspect. But it's not all bad like some like to claim.
Sorry, I wasn't trying to claim Wiki is all bad. I've used it plenty of times. However, I find the part quoted in this thread suspect (and there's no attribution on Wiki).
 
  • Like
Reactions: jamesjimcie
It seems that WGN America is the now (sorry Spike) official "Cops" channel now. I swear it's on every day for hours now. I guess they have to fill programming with something.
Just like USA is the Law and Order SVU channel. I remember back in the day when these channels use to show action cartoons in the afternoon and good movies. Now all it is coptv and realitytv marathons. This is why on demand services like Netflix are becoming more popular.
 
Just like USA is the Law and Order SVU channel. I remember back in the day when these channels use to show action cartoons in the afternoon and good movies. Now all it is coptv and realitytv marathons. This is why on demand services like Netflix are becoming more popular.
That and Mr. Robot are the only things I watch on USA. And White Collar before it got cancelled.
 
That and Mr. Robot are the only things I watch on USA. And White Collar before it got cancelled.
Also since you can stream the earlier seasons of those shows on Netflix and Amazon as I watched all the seasons of White Collar on Netflix and never even tuned in on USA Network many cord cutters don't need the channels just for a few shows while most of the time they are just coptv realitytv marathon crap content.
 
No longer do the viewers count. It is all down to money. I still feel, when these fights happen, Dish, Direct, cable should be able to import another station of the same network to cover the viewers until the issue is resolved. I am sure if that happened a company like Tribune would be much quicker to solve the issue. It is crazy we cannot have that. Again, it comes down to the viewer. If enough of us complained enough, something would be done. But enough don't.
 
No longer do the viewers count. It is all down to money. I still feel, when these fights happen, Dish, Direct, cable should be able to import another station of the same network to cover the viewers until the issue is resolved. I am sure if that happened a company like Tribune would be much quicker to solve the issue. It is crazy we cannot have that. Again, it comes down to the viewer. If enough of us complained enough, something would be done. But enough don't.
Let's assume you get your wish. Wouldn't that give the MVPD all of the negotiating "power"? Yes, I think there are changes that need to be made to the current system, but I don't think importing distants is a good idea.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jamesjimcie
Just like USA is the Law and Order SVU channel. I remember back in the day when these channels use to show action cartoons in the afternoon and good movies. Now all it is coptv and realitytv marathons. This is why on demand services like Netflix are becoming more popular.

I wish WGN America would air the morning news as they did years ago. Supposedly certain national segments could not be shown outside the Chicago DMA, and also the morning anchors have a good sense of humor like the show. Now they don't show any of it and Cubs or Sox games. Dsh customers, it sucks your local WGN was taken down but WGN America is no real loss.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jamesjimcie
Remember there are two WGN's, WGN TV9 Chicago (OTA) and WGN America (Cable/Satellite).

I am very aware of the complete history of WGN. I'm not understanding what you mean to remember there is a local and National channel.
Why would I refer to WGN Chicago, or why would DISH say a Network station in a local market isn't worth it? No one has ever said WGN Chicago is the problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jamesjimcie
I have a hard time believe a website that anyone can edit (and the "fact" can't be supported from other sites).

Also, assuming this is a multi-year deal, is the increase amount from year one? Year three? All combined?
I have a hard time believe a website that anyone can edit (and the "fact" can't be supported from other sites).

Also, assuming this is a multi-year deal, is the increase amount from year one? Year three? All combined?


If this comes across as rude, my apologizes. But what part of, "May be both rumor and/or speculation" didn't you not understand?

The 1st post in this thread came from a DISH release stating:

In addition to asking for significant price increases for local channels, Tribune is attempting to "force bundle" an unrelated and low-performing cable channel, WGN America, with the media conglomerate's local broadcast stations.

Is 2.4 times a significant price increase? I’d say yes. Is it what they actually asked for? (Read my first sentence.) They are not negotiating in public, and neither company has stated what the DISH release called a significant price increases.

The years in deal are part of the negotiations and (as in the price) can change multiple times within the same negotiation section. “Assuming” the 2.4 times is correct it simply means over the same period. Whether it’s one, two, or twenty years it’s 2.4 times over what they’re paying now. (i.e. If they currently pay $300M over 3 years it comes to $100M/year. Multiple $100M/year times 2.4, and than by the number of years they’re asking for, it still comes to 2.4 times more.)

You may, or may not fine this interest but, my correction request to Tribune mentioning the 2.4 increase… I so far no denial email back from Tribune stating it’s incorrect. Does this mean it’s actually correct? ABSOLUTELY not! …But it doesn’t mean it’s wrong either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jamesjimcie

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 2)

Latest posts